American Energy Alliance

The Green Left Doesn’t Like It When Environmental Laws Are Turned on Them

When Interior Secretary Doug Burgum ordered a halt to the Empire Wind Project, which proposed building a subsidy-driven, expensive offshore wind farm in federal waters off the coast of New York state, supporters of the project decried the move, alleging it was the first such action ever taken by a government. 

Governor Kathy Hochul, a proponent of the Norwegian-owned project, accused the federal government of “overreach” and vowed to “fight this every step of the way to protect union jobs, affordable energy, and New York’s economic future.”  Never mind that the “affordable energy” she cites is over three times as expensive as a natural gas plant would produce – if only she’d stop blocking gas pipelines and allow drilling in New York’s share of the Marcellus formation, the same resource that’s brought Pennsylvania both wealth and energy security. 

Supporters of the “green transition” piled on, alleging that Secretary Burgum had sent a “chilling” message to all energy projects, and claiming that his decision to review the hastily approved permits was unique, or groundbreaking, or something new.  

Nothing could be further from the truth. On the very first day of President Biden’s presidency, he issued an executive order revoking a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. With the stroke of a pen, he idled thousands of pipeline workers on a project that had already crossed the U.S.-Canada border, and upon which billions of dollars had already been spent.  

In fact, a quick review of Biden’s actions as president shows a long string of broken promises, agreements, contracts, and laws, all in pursuit of “net-zero,” the “green transition,” and his pledge to “end fossil fuels,” which animated his entire administration.   

Here is a brief list of some of Biden’s actions, some of which are still being litigated: 

These represent only a small handful of the detrimental contributions of the Biden administration; the Institute for Energy Research compiled over 250 examples of actions they took to limit energy and mineral development (necessary for energy uses, including “green energy”) during their tenure. 

Secretary Burgum’s decision to pause and review the Empire Wind Project fits squarely within the norms that the federal government itself has established. If anything, it should prompt a long-overdue conversation about the chaos and inconsistency of a permitting process that can greenlight flawed projects while stonewalling essential infrastructure. What the moment truly calls for is not selective outrage, but comprehensive reform—so that energy development in America can proceed transparently, lawfully, and in the public interest.

Exit mobile version