The Washington Post Again Calls for Higher Gas Prices

All across America, motorists are rejoicing as gasoline prices plummet. Low gasoline prices are a bright spot in an otherwise dismal economic picture.  But amazingly, the out-of-touch editors of the Washington Post think that the masses should not have access to affordable gasoline or inexpensive go-anywhere transportation options.

The editors opine :

[Higher gas taxes] would stimulate the market for new fuel-efficient cars; defund mischief-making petro-states; and cut carbon emissions. Not only that, it would reduce traffic, curb urban sprawl and, by giving drivers an incentive to drive more slowly, improve highway safety.

At the most basic level, the editors of the Washington Post want to drive up the costs of automobility and limit Americans’ transportation options. The Post‘s editors are apparently not happy that we have the freedom to go where they want, when we want, using the mode of transportation we find most convenient. Inexpensive personal transportation allows us to do more with our lives-it gives us greater employment options, greater schooling options for our children, greater shopping options, and greater options for recreation. In short, the editors of the Washington Post want to limit Americans’ options.

High Gasoline Prices Limit Transportation Options

The Post‘s editors note that high gasoline price stimulate the demand for fuel-efficient cars. This is true. But the editors fail to note that higher gasoline price limit Americans’ automobile options. Smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles are not always the best. For example, a moped gets better fuel economy than a Honda Accord, but it’s easier to take the family to Grandma’s house in an Accord than a moped.
The Post‘s editors note that high gasoline prices reduce traffic. This is true because fewer people can afford to drive. The Post’s editors apparently think that pricing poor people out of the market is a good thing. In reality, reducing people’s transportation options is harmful because it limits employment opportunities.

The Post‘s editors also claim that high gasoline prices will "defund mischief-making petro-states" and "improve highway safety." Unsurprisingly they provide no evidence that either of these statements is true. If high taxes on gasoline could defund petro-states, we should have already seen that occur as a result of Europe’s exorbitantly high gasoline taxes. But even in Europe, more and more people continue to drive and dictators are still in control in Iran and Venezuela.

Transportation is a Good Thing, Not Something to be Discouraged

The editors of the Washington Post do not understand that affordable and efficient transportation is a good thing. Improved transportation is a wonderful part of modern life, allowing us to do more with less time.

The reality of modern life is that the majority of people and jobs are located in the suburbs. People have voluntarily chosen to live in the suburbs, not clustered near subway stations. For most people, automobility is necessary to more easily take care of their families. In most cases, automobility is the quickest and most affordable mode of transportation available.

High Gasoline Prices Harm Our Quality of Life

High gasoline prices and high gasoline taxes harm the quality-of-life of Americans. Contrary to the desires of the Washington Post’s editorial board, the Federal government should facilitate transportation options, not limit them. Gas taxes should pay for road improvements, not increased in an attempt to manipulate American society.

What’s Left for the Left?

In the December 5th Wall Street Journal, KimStrassel discusses the boot that may soon drop on the U.S. economy as a result of current discussions within President-elect Obama’s transition team.  Ms. Strassel has quickly distinguished herself as one of Washington’s most insightful analysts of the big picture, and on the issue of what makes the economy grow – energy – she has once again hit the nail directly on the head. The premise of the piece is that the left has thus far beendenied much in President-elect Obama’s upcoming administration, but may receiverepayment for their support in the form of the energy and environmentselections.  Ms. Strassel has picked up on something that the media seemsto have selectively missed.  With the ascension of the left of centerCenter for American Progress’s John Podesta atop the Obama transition team,there is a strong possibility that the new administration will exert its moreradical inclinations on the very stuff that makes all economic progresspossible in the first place – affordable and reliable energy. 

Nothing is more central to America’s economic strength asthe ready and available provision of affordable energy to run our factories andfarms, power our industries and businesses, heat and light our homes and makepossible our daily commutes.  In a phrase, energy is the lifeblood of theeconomy.

In the midst of a deep recession with millions of Americanslosing their jobs, this makes the Obama energy and environment team at least asimportant as the economic team.  But the signs are not good.  Thebuzz in Washington is that the President-elect seems to be taking his cues fromthe John Podesta, George Soros principalfunder of the Center for American Progress) and Al Gore crowd.  Atop theObama short-list for key energy andenvironmental posts are individuals who have long practiced the politics ofscarcity and government rationing, setting the stage for an even longer andmore protracted economic downturn.   

The U.S. has plenty of energy resources.  We are theSaudi Arabia of coal and oil shale and yet ninety-six percent of our governmentlands lie fallow for energy production.  Leasing these lands would be aninstant job creator and an economic stimulus plan that wouldn’t cost U.S.taxpayers one red cent.  On the other hand, if government policies forceenergy prices higher and increase federal control over who gets to use energy,how much they get to use and which sources they are allowed to choose from,Americans and American businesses will surely suffer. 

Affordable, reliable and abundant energy working in freemarkets with the hands of free people has been the most liberating force everto affect the globe.  The U.S. has became the world’s most powerful nationnot by force, but rather by using energy to produce affordable goods andservices, all the while taking the drudgery away from everyday life through theapplication of increasingly efficient energy technologies.

Let us hope that President-elect Obama rejects individualswho seek to restrict growth by restricting access to energy.  Let us alsohope that his picks reject the false notion that we are running out of energyand support the production of our vast domestic resources.  Let’sleave the energy future to the free market, not Washington bailout artists.

 

AEA Comments on EPA’s Flawed Greenhouse Gas Regulation Scheme

The American Energy Alliance recently sent comments to EPA on EPA’s plan to regulate greenhouse gases. We will continue to fight against ideological fringe groups to who are working to dramatically increase the cost of energy in America.

This past summer, EPA released an "Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" (ANPR) that outlined how it might go about shoehorning the ability to regulate carbon, at best (outright criminalize it, at worst) into the authority already assigned to the EPA by the Clean Air Act. The comment period for these proposed regulations ended on Friday.

AEA was instrumental in building an aggressive coalition aimed at exposing the folly of allowing an army of federal bureaucrats to unilaterally regulate 85 percent of the output of America’s economy. We used our grassroots network to generate more than 6,600 comments from individuals to EPA, and produced a series of detailed comments explaining some of the many ways in which theANPR was flawed. 

The following represent some of the highlights of our analysis:

  • EPA outright ignores the impact of greenhouse gas emissions from developing countries in its analysis.
    • EPA does not consider that China is the world’s #1 emitter of carbon dioxide.
    • Since 2000, China’s greenhouse gases emissions have nearly doubled, India’s increased by 36%, Russia’s increased by 10%, but the U.S.’s only increased by 3%.
  • EPA does not explain why global temperature has not increased since 2000. This seems a very important fact if EPA is supposed to regulate greenhouse gases in the name of global warming.
  • EPA Administrator Johnson stated that the Clean Air Act is "ill-suited for the task of regulating greenhouse gases." This is true:
    • If EPA regulates greenhouse gases under one section of the Clean Air Act, it will be forced to regulate greenhouse gases under other sections, creating an uncontrollable regulatory cascade that may include a national ambient air quality standard for greenhouse gases, and numerous other regulations.
    • EPA’s regulation of carbon dioxide would lead to a series of bizarre and unpalatable outcomes, such as a tax on every dairy cow of $175 per year, a tax on every head of cattle of $44 per year, and a tax on every hog of $20 per year as a result of the greenhouse gas "emissions" of these entities.
    • EPA would also be forced to regulate building structures ranging in size from a sports arena to a church. Also to be caught up in the net: schools, hospitals, and office buildings, and possibly even lawn mowers, depending on their size. The impact of this would be immediate, and its consequences would not be pretty.

The Clean Air Act is indeed ill-suited to regulate greenhouse gases. AEA will continue to leverage our grassroots and in-house scholars to explain the flaws of these massive attacks on freedom and affordable energy.

Aliens Cause Global Warming

Author Michael Crichton passed away last week. His books were focused on controversial issues including medical malpractice, airline safety, biotechnology, nanotechnology, and Japan’s economic dominance. His most controversial book was State of Fear , a book about global warming where environmentalists are the bad guys. The book was controversial because Crichton challenged conventional wisdom about global warming.

But Crichton was not ignorant of global warming science and policy. He spent a lot of time studying the issues and have some important insights. As he was working on State of Fear, he gave provocative lecture at the California Institute of Technology titled "Aliens Cause Global Warming." To commemorate Crichton’s passing, the Wall Street Journal has republished his lecture here . Crichton’s critiques of the global warming models are still valid today.

 

Alaska Loses

Alaska Ad from the American Energy Alliance

AEA Releases New Video, “Alaska Loses”

“Nancy Pelosi, who leads the Democrats in the House, and Harry Reid, who leads the Democrats in the Senate, are hostile to finding and using more domestic energy resources like coal, oil, and natural gas.  Our new video alerts the citizens of Alaska what that means for them:  higher prices for energy and fewer jobs for all Alaskans.”


Washington, DC – Washington, DC – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) today released a new video entitled, Alaska Loses , to alert Alaskans that the current leadership in Congress is hostile to the energy – the lifeblood of the Alaska economy.President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement:

“Nancy Pelosi, who leads the Democrats in the House, and Harry Reid, who leads the Democrats in the Senate, are hostile to finding and using more domestic energy resources like coal, oil, and natural gas.  Our new video alerts the citizens of Alaska what that means for them:  higher prices for energy and fewer jobs for all Alaskans.”

“We will continue to point out the statements of those who oppose finding and using energy domestic energy resources on and offshore.  More domestic energy production means lower energy prices for Alaska families and businesses, more jobs, and greater energy independence.  We will keep working to educate voters, government officials, and other stakeholders until everyone understands this fundamental fact.  I am confident that the citizens of Alaska, given the choice, would prefer to use the energy resources they own over that of thugs like Hugo Chavez.”

Watch the new AEA video by clicking here.  Script of “Alaska Loses” follows:
“Alaska isblessed with the most abundant energy resources in the nation.  Safeproduction provides good paying jobs and bigger Permanent Funddividends for our families.
But the Leaders in Washington don’t agree.
Ø Nancy Pelosi clip: “This call for drilling in protected areas is a hoax – it’s an absolute hoax.”
Ø Harry Reid clip:  “Oil makes us sick – we’ve got to stop using fossil fuels.”

If this is the leadership of change…all of Alaska loses out.”

About the American Energy Alliance

The American Energy Alliance (AEA)is a recently formed not-for-profit 501(c)(4) organization thatadvocates for free-market energy and environmental policies.  It isaffiliated with the Institute for Energy Research (IER),another not-for-profit – founded in 1989 – that conducts intensiveresearch and analysis on the functions, operations, and governmentregulation of global energy markets.  Both AEA and IER maintain thatfreely-functioning energy markets provide the most efficient andeffective solutions to today’s global energy and environmentalchallenges and, as such, are critical to the well-being of individualsand society.

www.americanenergyalliance.org/

# # #

South Carolina – Two Senators

Listen: SC Senators Radio Ad

AEA Tells South Carolina the Truth about Their Senators

“More energy production from resources owned by the American people  — on and offshore – means lower energy prices for American families and businesses. 

Senator DeMint gets it. Senator Graham, unfortunately, does not.”

Washington, DC – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) continues its efforts to keep leaders accountable for their energy policies with a new radio spot, “Two Senators.”  AEA’s latest ads will run starting today in South Carolina.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement:

“Our continued education efforts are driven by a simple truth:  more production from resources owned by the American people – on and offshore — means lower energy prices for American families and businesses.  We will keep working to educate voters, government officials, and other stakeholders until everyone understands this fundamental fact.

“In South Carolina, this issue is marked by an unfortunate divergence between their two United States Senators.  Senator DeMint is a tireless champion for more domestic energy, lower energy prices, and more jobs here at home.  Senator Graham decided to collaborate with those who will restrict our domestic energy resources.

“I am confident that the citizens of South Carolina, given the choice, would prefer to use the energy resources they own rather than rely on thugs like Hugo Chavez.  I hope Senator Graham comes to that same realization.”

Listen to the ad

Script of the “Two Senators” follows:

“It’s a tale of two United States Senators.

As our families struggle with rising energy prices Senator Jim DeMint fought hard to lift the ban on offshore exploration and production.

Senator Lindsey Graham took a different approach—supporting a deal that permanently locks up more than 75% of the United States energy rich Outer Continental Shelf.

Senator DeMint’s plan for additional exploration means lower energy costs for our families, more jobs for our economy and greater security for our nation.

Senator Graham’s misguided plan will have little effect on energy prices and only benefit corrupt oil rich nations, like Venezuela and Nigeria.

How can two Senators from the same state, representing the same people have such differing views?”

 

AEA Launches South Carolina Ad “Two Senators”

Listen
The text of the ad follows

“It’s a tale of two United States Senators.

As our families struggle with rising energy prices Senator Jim DeMint fought hard to lift the ban on offshore exploration and production.”

“Senator Lindsey Graham took a different approach—supporting a deal that permanently locks up more than 75% of the United States energy rich Outer Continental Shelf.”

“Senator DeMint’s plan for additional exploration means lower energy costs for our families, more jobs for our economy and greater security for our nation.”

“Senator Graham’s misguided plan will have little effect on energy prices and only benefit corrupt oil rich nations, like Venezuela and Nigeria.”

“How can two Senators from the same state, representing the same people have such differing views?

Call Senator Graham at 864-250-1417 and tell him to follow Senator DeMint’s lead and support energy policies that benefit South Carolina families.”

Read the whole fact sheet here

 

AEA Keeps Focus on Domestic Energy Production

Alliance Continues American Energy Advocacy Campaign with New Ad

“More energy production from resources owned by the American people – on and offshore – means lower energy prices for American families and businesses. Some people get it.  Some don’t.” 

Washington, D.C.

 

– The American Energy Alliance (AEA) continues its efforts to keep leaders accountable for their energy policies with a new radio spot, “Keep Fighting.”  AEA’s latest ad will start running today in Mississippi.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement:

“Our continued education efforts are driven by a simple but powerful idea; more production from resources owned by the American people – on and offshore — means lower energy prices for American families and businesses.  We will keep working to educate voters, government officials, and other stakeholders until everyone understands this fundamental fact.

“Frankly, I am shocked that even now some of our elected leaders continue to obstruct policies that will reduce energy prices, reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy from unstable regions, employ thousands of Americans in good paying jobs, and put more money into the budgets of American families and individuals, all because they are shackled to a failed ideology.”

“At the same time, it is appropriate to recognize those who support the right policies for American consumers.  That’s why we are urging voters in Mississippi to encourage their Senators to keep fighting for American energy production.”

 

Script of the ad “Keep Fighting” follows:

“They say change is coming, but tough economic times still lie ahead for many Mississippi families.

Thankfully, Senators Roger Wicker and Thad Cochran fought to lift the ban on offshore energy exploration and production.
And today, gas prices are falling, providing needed relief to our families.

But some in Congress want to reinstate the ban and stop offshore exploration before it even starts.  And others want to increase energy taxes, eliminating good Mississippi jobs and sending prices soaring again.  That’s not the kind of change Mississippi needs.

Call Senator Wicker at (601) 965-4644 and Senator Cochran at (601) 965-4459.  Thank them for working to lower gas prices by lifting the offshore energy ban and tell them to fight against job killing new energy taxes.”

You can listen to this ad by clicking here:  Keep Fighting Ad

You can view the fact sheet for this a by clicking here: Keep Fighting Fact Sheet

The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is a recently formed not-for-profit 501(c)(4) organization that advocates for free-market energy and environmental policies.  It is affiliated with the Institute for Energy Research (IER), another not-for-profit – founded in 1989 – that conducts intensive research and analysis on the functions, operations, and government regulation of global energy markets.  Both AEA and IER maintain that freely-functioning energy markets provide the most efficient and effective solutions to today’s global energy and environmental challenges and, as such, are critical to the well-being of individuals and society.