Fmr. U.S. Rep. John Peterson to Join American Energy Alliance’s Board of Directors

Washington, DC – Former Pennsylvania congressman and long-time energy advocate John E. Peterson joined the board of directors of the American Energy Alliance (AEA), a Washington, DC-based advocacy organization that promotes market-based solutions to meet our nation’s growing energy demands. Peterson will join the board immediately, taking an active leadership role in AEA’s state and federal advocacy efforts leading up to the November mid-term elections.

“Affordable, homegrown energy is the foundation for a prosperous and productive society,” said Peterson. “I look forward to this opportunity, which will allow me to continue the process of educating citizens about the importance of market-based energy solutions and providing them with the tools they need to ensure their voices are heard in the corridors of power both in Washington and in state Capitols across the nation.”

Peterson went on to say that after a year and a half observing the energy proposals put forward by this Congress and Administration, he could no longer sit on the sidelines and watch years of hard work go down the drain. “For nearly three decades, politicians of both political parties failed to address our nation’s energy challenges. And to put all your energy eggs in one basket, as Washington has done as of late with renewables, shortchanges the American people. We need an energy policy that takes full advantage of our resources, puts folks to work, and lessons our foreign dependence.”

Congressman Peterson served on both the House Resources Committee and Appropriations Committee for 10 years. While in Congress, Peterson built a reputation as a principled legislator who worked across the aisle on legislation aimed at creating jobs, spurring economic development, and ending the decade’s old embargo on offshore domestic energy exploration.

“As a Member of Congress, John Peterson was one of the fiercest critics of the Bush Administration’s energy policy and a stalwart advocate of increasing domestic oil and natural gas production,” said Thomas J. Pyle, president of AEA. “In addition to his years of work promoting commonsense solutions to solving our domestic energy crisis, Congressman Peterson has been unwavering in his support for affordable, reliable and efficient energy for all Americans.”

Pyle went on to say that Peterson will play a leading role in an AEA-led effort to hold elected officials accountable at the ballot box this November. “As a member of our board, Congressman Peterson will work closely with AEA staff to ensure that lawmakers are held accountable for their positions on energy regulation and legislation. We look forward to this relationship and are grateful that the Congressman has agreed to volunteer his time to help us advance our mission.”

Peterson will advise AEA on education and advocacy strategy at the state and federal level. After serving six terms in the U.S. House of Representatives and over 25 years in local and state government, Peterson retired from elected office in 2008. Since his retirement, Peterson has remained active in local and state energy issues, serving as executive director of the Alleghany Forest Alliance. He currently resides in Pleasantville, Pennsylvania with his wife, Sandy, and golden retriever, Milo.

#####

 

5/18/10

Kerry-LiebermanLikened to Mr. Potato Head – Cosmetic Features Can Be Rearranged, Butthe Concept Remains Wholly Intact (“Risk” and “Operation” Come to MindToo). Wall Street Journal(5/18) editorializes, “Despite the most creative rhetoric this side ofObamaCare, voters have figured out that "cap and trade" involvesartificial carbon rationing and vast new energy taxes. So the main goalof John Kerry and Joe Lieberman has been attempting to disguise thesetruths in the climate bill they released to much fanfare last week. Thebill was nine months in gestation once it became clear that the versionthe House passed last summer—which one of five Democrats opposed—wasdoomed in the Senate. Yet no one should mistake Kerry-Lieberman for anew approach. Jim Lucier, an investment analyst at Capital AlphaPartners, calls it the Mr. Potato Head bill. The cosmetic features canbe rearranged, but it’s still a Mr. Potato Head. This is still cap andtax—except with new and larger subsidies, outright corporate bribes,and the rest of the political palm-greasing that Democrats hope canstill lead to a Rose Garden ceremony this year. The bill sets a 2020target for reducing CO2 emissions by 17% from 2005 levels, and 83% by2050, the same as the House. Of course, please don’t say this hasanything to do with global warming. "We don’t want to mix messageshere," Senator Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said on Earth Day. "I’m allfor protecting the Earth, but this is about energy independence."

Scrantonicity: PA’sJunior Senator Finds Himself Eyebrow Deep in Complicated Stuff Again;This Time? Wants Senate Vote on His Ridiculous “Tailoring” Amendment. E&E News(5/18) reports, “Two Senate Democrats are considering an alternative toSenate efforts to stymie the Obama administration’s climate regulations. With two bills to block or limit U.S. EPA’sclimate rules pending, Sens. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Tom Carper (D-Del.)are discussing a measure that would seek to exempt small stationarysources from greenhouse gas regulations while allowing the agency toregulate larger emitters, according to a Senate aide familiar with theproposal. "I think it would be very helpful for folks who represent astate like mine as well as others to have an alternative available,"Casey said yesterday. Casey declined to say what such a measure couldentail. "I don’t want to characterize it, because a quickcharacterization would not do justice to what the nature of theamendment will be if we have to use it," he said. The proposal is "very similar" to EPA’s "tailoring" rule forgreenhouse gases, the aide said. EPA last week finalized a rule thatseeks to phase in permitting requirements beginning with the largeststationary sources.

“Kings of the World”:Federal Agency Charged with Overseeing Offshore Minerals Flatly Refusesto Comply with Request to Send Representative to Senate for Hearing. The Hill(5/17) reports, “The federal agency that regulates offshore oildrilling declined to send a witness to the Senate Homeland Security andGovernmental Affairs Committee’s hearing Monday on the federal responseto the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill, Committee Chairman JoeLieberman (I-Conn.) said. The committee had requested the appearance ofa top official from the Interior Department’s Minerals ManagementService. Lieberman’s panel is probing the adequacy of BP’s federallyapproved oil drilling and spill response plans. “I regret that the MMSleadership has chosen not to appear before our committee today becausethey really need to be asked the same questions I am going to askHomeland Security, the Coast Guard and BP,” Lieberman said Mondayafternoon as the hearing commenced. Lieberman opened the hearing withan attack on federal oversight of offshore drilling. He faulted MMS forapproving inadequate BP plans. “Did our government, through MMS,require an oil spill response plan adequate to the widest range ofpossible dangers, including the failure of a blowout preventer?,”Lieberman said, referring to a failure of device that is supposed tocut off damaged wells. “It sure appears that they did not.”

Fmr. Illinois Rep.Pops the Balloon of Complacency on LCFS – Just Because It’s Not inKerry-Lieberman Doesn’t Mean It Won’t Be on Your Doorstep By Christmas. Fmr. U.S. Rep. Thomas Corcoran (R-Ill.) writes (5/18) for the Daily Caller,“While they may not know it yet, the decision to leave the LCFS on thecutting room floor is a rare spot of good news for a broke and brokenAmerican public. After all, ever since the governor of Californiasigned an executive order in 2007 setting his state down the LCFS path,those of us who have seen this movie before began to brace for theinevitable national standard from Washington—part of theless-than-implicit pact we have with the world’s eighth largest economyto bail it out anytime it bites off a mandate too big for it to chew.But given a second glance at the legislative movement taking placethroughout the country, perhaps we’ve been duped. True, it’s unlikelythat an LCFS will be resurrected as part of the Kerry-Lieberman bill.But that doesn’t mean it’s prepared to stay in the grave forever. Rightnow, in more than 20 states across the country, efforts are under wayto copy the California model and paste it into statute—with or withoutthe consent of the legislature. And while you may think you’d be safeif you happen to live in one of the remaining 30 states, it’s time tothink again.

Group thatSpecializes in Telling Investors Not to Invest In Profitable EnergyProjects Affixes Its Target on Canada’s Oil Sands; So We Just Bought 10More Shares This AM. ClimateWire(5/18, subs. req’d) reports, “A supporter of Albertan oil development,Michael Whatley of the Consumer Energy Alliance, disputed thesuggestion that demand from the United States would drop for oil sandsfuels amid climate regulations in the United States. Even if oil pricessurge above $120 a barrel, there is not an immediate replacement forthe Canadian fuel, he said. "If we take a major part of our consumptionoff the table, where are we going to get it from?" he said. "It’s notgoing to come from Mexico." Canada currently is the United States’largest importer of crude oil. The Ceres report provides a strongerargument against the adoption of low-carbon fuel standards than it doesagainst cutting oil sands development, Whatley said. Wind and solarpower fueling the electric grid for widespread use of alternativevehicles could take decades, he said. Companies already have reducedthe carbon footprint per barrel of tar sands oil by more than 30percent since 1990, and are researching ways to cut it even more, hesaid. At an event at the Canadian Embassy in May, a representative fromthe U.S. State Department said that an oil supply from a stable,democratic ally enhances "global security today and into the future".In the meantime, many proposals for low-carbon fuel standards in U.Sstates are "stalled," one source said. Wisconsin, for example, strippedthe idea out of a bill that failed in its legislature this year.

Opposition Continuesto Build in AK Over Plan by Folks Who Have Never Been to the State toLock Up Millions of Acres – Let’s Just Call It “Wilderness”! — onNorth Slope. Paul Jenkins writes (5/15) in the Anchorage Daily News,“Here’s a lousy idea: Let’s lock up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge’s1.5 million-acre coastal plain as a wilderness so the evil oil industrycan never search for the estimated 11 billion barrels of recoverableoil believed pooled there. After all, the Energy InformationAdministration says this nation only imports 9.7 million barrels ofcrude oil a day, up more than a half-million barrels daily over thesame period last year. About 5.9 million barrels come from our goodfriends at OPEC. With all that, who really needs to find and producenew oil? That’s easy. We do. At a Tuesday night hearing in Anchorage,39 people spoke against a wilderness designation, 26 in favor. There isgrowing opposition to the idea across Alaska, where ANWR developmentgenerally is supported — and where there already are more than 58million acres of designated wilderness and more than 190 millionprotected acres. Gov. Sean Parnell and Sens. Lisa Murkowski and MarkBegich already are on record against such a designation for the coastalplain. ANWR’s coastal plain is just a tiny dot on Alaska’s topographical face, butit stirs strong emotions. It is either our best shot at another oiljackpot or a pristine, sensitive American Serengeti.

How Dead IsCap-and-Raid? So Dead, That Even the Furthest-to-the-Left Candidate forU.S. Senate in KY Can’t Tell People Fast Enough that He Opposes It. Lt. Gov. and U.S. Senate candidate Don Mongiardo writes (5/16) in the Lexington Herald-Leader,“The fundamental question for Democratic Primary voters is: Who’s onyour side? As attorney general, Jack Conway collected over $70,000 incampaign cash from utility companies while his office negotiatedmillions in rate hikes. Conway has pocketed $106,000 from Wall Streetinsiders, including Goldman Sachs. I have stood up for Kentuckyratepayers and challenged Conway on his unethical conduct and proposedthe toughest Wall Street reforms of any candidate. Since expressingsupport for Henry Waxman’s cap-and-trade bill last year, nationalDemocrats have pumped over $500,000 into Conway’s campaign coffers. In contrast, I strongly oppose cap and trade. It will devastate Kentucky’s economy and increase electric rates.If you’re looking for another lawyer-politician who’s more comfortableschmoozing with Washington lobbyists than Kentucky factory workers,Jack’s your guy. But if you’re looking for a small-town doctor who willhold Wall Street accountable, get spending under control and championthe cause of Kentucky’s working families, your hunt is over.

Energy “Dilettantes”Lead Procession Toward the Cliff in the U.S. Senate – Conn. PaperWonders Aloud How 2 Dudes from New England Got Tasked With This Job. Waterbury (Conn.) American-Republican(5/18) editorializes, “Sen. Kerry was joined by global-warmingdilettante Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., in introducing Cap-and-Tax II.Thankfully, no Republicans, not even mushy-middleman Lindsey Graham,R-S.C., joined the party. So there’s hope wiser men and women in theSenate will block this abomination, at least until voters in Novemberbuild a more permanent firewall against Democratic folly andoverreaching. Sen. Kerry is precisely wrong in his assertion Americaneeds a new energy policy because of the Deepwater Horizon oil-rigdisaster. What it needs is intelligent, ethical, watchful regulation ofoil exploration. Americans have known for at least two years that theMinerals Management Service, the arm of the Interior Departmentresponsible for enforcing such regulations, was corrupt. Sen. Kerryknows perfectly well the Deepwater Horizon disaster is rare if notunprecedented, and that thousands of other oil rigs have operatedwithout incident in U.S. waters for decades. The accident did not setup a clamor for new policy; it revealed a need for more carefulregulation and, perhaps, an investment by oil companies and governmentinto strategies for preventing leaks.

FOIA Request Submitted to EPA on Senate Climate Bill

Washington, DC – Following numerous press reports that SenatorsJohn Kerry (D-Mass.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.)submitted their climate change legislation to the Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA) for analysis, the American Energy Alliance filed a Freedom ofInformation Act (FOIA) request with the EPA to obtain a copy of thelegislation.

“The American people have the right to know what’s in thisbill,” said Thomas J. Pyle, president of AEA, a market-based energy advocacy organization. “While Senators Graham,Kerry and Lieberman have been meeting behind closed doors with the utilityindustry, big business, environmental groups and big oil, the American consumerhas been shut out of the process.  Not surprisingly, it is the Americanconsumer that will foot the bill when thislegislation forces gasoline,diesel and utility bills to increase.”

Senators Kerry, Graham and Lieberman have worked for nearly sixand a half months to craft legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions andincrease the price of coal, oil, and natural gas – 85 percent of our energysupply. While the specificcontents of this legislation seemto be top secret, we do know that for any energy rationing scheme to work, it will lead toconsiderably higher energy costs for American families and businesses.

“We filed this request on behalf of the American people,”continued Pyle.  “Since Senators Graham, Kerry and Lieberman have refusedto share this job-killing legislation with the public, maybe the “most open andtransparent” administration in history will honor our request. After all, whatdo they have to hide?”

Following is an excerpt of the FOIA request:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, Ihereby request a copy of any and all energy legislation from Senator Kerry, orSenator Graham, or Senator Lieberman, or all three collectively, sent to EPA tobe analyzed or modeled within the past month. This includes requests fromstaffers working for Senators Kerry, Graham, or Lieberman. Colloquially, thisdraft legislation is known as the Kerry-Graham-Lieberman climate bill andvarious media sources (including the Washington Post, L.A. Times and Politico)have reported draft legislation has been sent to EPA to be modeled.

As President Obama has emphasized, “a democracy requiresaccountability, and accountability requires transparency,” and “the Freedom ofInformation Act . . . is the most prominent expression of a profound nationalcommitment to ensuring open Government.” Accordingly, the President hasdirected that FOIA “be administered with a clear presumption: In the face ofdoubt, openness prevails” and that a “presumption of disclosure should beapplied to all decisions involving FOIA.”

To view the entire FOIA request, click HERE.

Updated 4/30/10: AEA submitted a FOIA request to the Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA) in addition to the EPA FOIA request.

#####

 

AEA Statement on Senate Climate Change “Postponement”

Washington, DC – The American Energy Alliance(AEA), a non-profit organization that educatesand engages the public on benefits ofmarket-based energy policy, today congratulated Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.)for siding with his constituents and opting out of one of the most economicallydamaging pieces of legislation this country has ever seen.

“Senator Graham has spent nearly six and a halfmonths negotiating behind closed doors with big business, special interests andrent-seeking lobbyists to increase the price of 85 percent of the energyAmericans use daily,” said Thomas J. Pyle, president of AEA. “And the Senatorshould be congratulated today for apparently backing out of this job killinglegislation.”

AEA was the firstorganization to launch a comprehensive media campaign in South Carolina shortlyafter Senator Graham announced his intentto draft a national energy tax with Senator John Kerry(D-Mass.). This campaign, which ranstatewide, was the beginning of a multi-pronged strategyto educate Palmetto State voters on the negative economic impacts such a planwould have on their state. This proposal, while not yet revealed publicly, was reported to have included a renewable electricity standard (RES), which is themandated use of expensive forms of electricity and a increase in the federalgasoline and diesel tax, which some have coined the “Graham Gas Tax.”

“By walking away from this effort, it is clearthat Senator Graham chose to listen to his constituents, who urged him to stayaway from this legislation. We hope that Senator Graham sticks to his guns andremains on the side of the American people who oppose cap-and-trade and anational energy tax,” concluded Pyle.

More on AEA’s efforts in South Carolina:

Press Release: RadioCampaign Seeks to Educate South Carolina Voters on Consequences ofCap-and-Trade

Media Alert: Inthe Crosshairs: AEA Launches another TV Ad in SC focused on Sen. Graham’sCap-and-Trade Support

Graham’s World vs. Real World: Sen.Graham Cap-and-Tax Double Talk Continues

####

What Offshore Drilling Looks Like

You may be surprised…
what offshore drilling looks like
[Read more…]

Different Rules for Different Energy?

Thirteen Senators Seek to Shut Down U.S. Coal Industry

Washington, DC – According to reports , thirteen U.S. senators today urged Majority Leader Reid and the leading authors of global warming legislation, Senators Kerry, Graham, and Lieberman, to specifically grant the EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants, in addition to other provisions included the bill, such as cap-and-trade and a renewable electricity mandate, which would also target coal-fired plants. Thomas J. Pyle, president of the non-partisan American Energy Alliance (AEA), released the following statement in response to the senators’ letter :

“This is just another in a long line of heavy-handed attempts to increase the government’s control over energy markets. If the signatories of this letter, clear opponents of affordable and reliable energy, really believed in the efficacy of “pricing carbon,” heavy-handed legislation would be more than enough to meet their goals.

“Apparently, it is not enough to make the price of electricity necessarily “skyrocket” through cap-and-trade legislation or a federal renewable mandate. It seems the real objective of these policymakers is to destroy the coal industry while hiding behind the EPA, an unelected bureaucracy. If these anti-energy advocates are successful in killing the coal industry, they’ll take with it affordable, reliable domestic energy and countless American jobs. EPA should be held accountable by Congress, not empowered by them.”

####

Climate Change and Politicians: “Do As I Say and Not As I Do”

Politicians worldwide seem not to be familiar with qualitymanagement principles, as they are simply not "walking the walk."  In fact, they are doing just theopposite where greenhouse gas emissions are concerned. Rather than conservingenergy through less usage, more efficient vehicles, mass transit andcarpooling, they are flying in private jets, driving gas guzzlers, and being chauffeuredin limousines. All of these activities emit more greenhouse emissions than thealternatives: using commercial jets and carpooling in alternative fuelvehicles.

The Climate Summit

Copenhagen is awash with delegates from countries around theworld for the climate summit. Not only are they awash with delegates, but theyhave hired over 1,200 limos and expect 140 private planes.[i]Not only are there insufficient limos in Denmark to meet the demand, but they haveto hire additional limos from Germany and Sweden, hundreds of miles away. And,only five of these cars are fueled by alternate sources of fuel. Denmark, forexample, has no hybrids because of taxes on those vehicles.

Since Denmark’s international airport cannot handle the 140private jets that are expected to carry the VIPs, the planes will have to flyto regional airports or to Sweden to park and later pick up their passengers,when they are ready to depart. Further, these VIPs evidently do not realizethat there is a recession, since rooms are going for 650 pounds per night andrestaurants are gearing up their menus with scallops, foie gras, and caviarwedges.

According to the organizers, the eleven day conference willcreate 41,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent, equal to the amount that asmall city would emit during that time frame.

Other Cases of Interest

Nancy Pelosi, Al Gore, Michele Obama, and Arnold Schwarzeneggerare other political figures who think they are immune to what they tell thegeneral public. They seem to believe that the public is OK with making theseelite people exceptions to the rules they make for the rest of us. However, thegeneral public may not understand just how high the amount of greenhouse gas emissionsthese politicians essentially flaunt as they go about their daily lives.  

Last week, the Los Angeles Auto Show had a guest visitor;California’s governor Arnold Schwarzenegger drove up in a gas-guzzling, 500-hp,19-mpg Porsche Turbo Cabriolet.[ii] And, he hadthe audacity to park illegally, flanked by a fleet of alternate-fuel vehiclesthat his policies have mandated. Schwarzenegger believes that California is atthe forefront of setting policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions thatthe nation should follow, including Assembly Bill 32 to monitor and limitgreenhouse gas emissions and low sulfur fuel standards to limit emissions fromvehicles.

For Schwarzenegger, this is only icing on the cake. Arnoldcommutes to work in Sacramento by private jet from his Brentwood mansion insouthern California. According to figures compiled by the Helium report, thegovernor’s jet does almost as much damage to the environment in one hour as asmall car does in a year. To ease his conscience, he buys credits to offset theenvironmental damages. However, the credits cost $43 per hour compared to$10,000 an hour to operate his jet.[iii] Obviously,for someone as wealthy as Arnold, it is a no brainer to tell his constituents "doas I say and not as I do." Obviously, the average Californian could not affordArnold’s lifestyle.

Nancy Pelosi also commutes to California, but in her casethe commute is longer than Arnold’s. She travels 3,000 miles across the country from her office in WashingtonD.C. But, she needs to make it in a plane that does not need to be refueled. Priorto the September 11, 2001, attacks, the Speaker of House flew commercial, justlike everybody else in Congress. But, those attacks provided a reason for theSpeaker, seconds removed from the Presidency, to have a military-stylepassenger plane equipped with beds, galleys, and business-class seating thatcan make the flight in any weather and be in contact with the White House if sowarranted.[iv]Again, it is an issue of "do as I say and not as I do."

Al Gore can worry about greenhouse gas emissions in "An InconvenientTruth," the film that brought him an Oscar, a shared Nobel Prize, and lots ofmoney, but facts are that his home uses more than 20 times the energy of theaverage U.S. home. According to the Nashville Electric Service, Gore’s mansion,located in a posh area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month thanthe average American household uses in an entire year. In 2006, Gore paidnearly $30,000 in electricity and natural gas bills for his estate.[v]Apparently, if you are wealthy enough to pay bills of this size, it doesn’tmatter that you contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.

When Michelle Obama was in France for D-Day commemorationswith her husband, the President, she used the opportunity to use taxpayers’money to make a surprise visit without the President to London.[vi]The private jet and the accompanying limousines to ensure that Michelle and herdaughters were safe emitted far more emissions than a commercial flight fromParis to London and back to the United States.  Those emissions grew even larger, as the first family andtheir secret service agents used limousines, rather than a hybrid or alternatefuel vehicles.

Conclusion

Politicians seem to believe that they are immune to thestandards they profess and the legislation that they pass because they areelitists tasked with running our country. However, management principles tellus that our leaders should "walk the walk." Why should the average citizen beasked to do what our leaders cannot do?

 



[i] Copenhagenclimate summit: 1,200 limos, 140 private planes and caviar wedges, www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-lprivate-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html

[ii] NationalReview Online, The ‘Green Governator’, December 2, 2009,http://planetgore.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDBhYTRmY2UxMTIzMjc3MjIxNTVhZDVhNTI3ZDBhNzY=  

[iii] LosAngeles Times, Governor’s private-jet commute comes under fire, March 6, 2008, www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0306arniecommute06-ON.html?&wired

[iv] Los AngelesTimes, Pelosi gets nonstop abuse over air travel, February 8, 2007, http://articles.latimes.com/2007/feb/08/nation/na-pelosi8

[v] Al Gore’sEnergy Use, www.snopes.com/politics/business/gorehome.asp

[vi] TheHuntington Post, Michelle Obama in London With Daughters For Surprise Visit, www.huntingtonpost.com/2009/06/08/michelle-obama-in-london_n_212622.html

Will Sen. Kerry Kite Surf to Copenhagen?

AEA urges Sen. Kerry to lead by example – be the first (and only) official to use carbon-free energy source to travel to global warming conf.

[Read more…]

In the Crosshairs: AEA Launches another TV Ad in SC focused on Sen. Graham’s Cap-and-Trade Support

Non-partisan group extends education, advocacy campaign for fourth consecutive week in Palmetto State

Washington, DC – As U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) continues to work to enact a job-killing cap-and-trade bill as part of larger global warming policy, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) – a non-partisan, non-profit advocacy organization– launched yet another television commercial today aimed at educating South Carolina residents about how cap-and-trade will increase energy prices, weaken America’s ability to compete in the global economy and cost good-paying jobs.

Thomas J. Pyle, AEA’s president, issued this statement:

“As Congress continues to work to ration and increase our energy resources through cap-and-trade, South Carolinians deserve to have all the facts and know where and why their elected officials in Washington stand on these critical issues. Legislation outlined by Senator Graham will force energy and electricity prices to skyrocket. And worse, these heavy-handed proposals will cost even more American jobs. While some in Congress have a ‘Washington position’ and a ‘homestate position,’ the facts about cap-and-trade do not change.”

Continued Pyle: “Senator Graham continues to tout ‘offshore drilling’ as part of his plan. And while this rhetoric is appealing, it discounts the fact that Congress has retired the offshore drilling ban, thanks in large part to the clear majority of Americans who favor responsible offshore energy development. If Senator Graham was sincere in his desire to increase domestic energy exploration, he’d urge the president and Interior secretary to do so immediately — not push a new national energy tax called cap-and-trade.”

NOTE: AEA launched an education and advocacy campaign in South Carolina on October 22. The objective of this multi-media campaign is to engage residents of South Carolina and arm them with the facts about global warming legislation Senator Graham is advocating. AEA is a non-partisan, non-profit energy advocacy group that engages in grassroots advocacy to promote market-based solutions to our nation’s energy and environmental challenges.

 

#####

 

[Read more…]

Why Support Cap-and-Trade? AEA’s 10 “Best” Reasons

WASHINGTON– In honor of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works’ passage of the Kerry-Boxer cap-and-trade bill, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) today released its top 10 reasons to support cap-and-trade:

10) It’ll be the largest tax increase in history and will help pay for the government takeover of health care.

9) America’s unemployment rate is only 10 percent. Higher energy prices and the resulting transfer of American businesses overseas will help us double it.

8) The U.S. has been the world’s number one economic superpower for long enough. It’s time to lie down and give someone else a turn.

7) Expensive energy is good. Really expensive energy is even better.

6) By making it more expensive to produce more of the vast amounts of American oil we have right at home and transitioning to affordable, commercial-scale alternatives that don’t exist, we can end our dependence on foreign oil in 10 years!

5) Spending billions of taxpayer dollars to create temporary, government jobs at the expense of long-term, private sector jobs not only makes perfect sense, it’ll be a boon to the nation’s struggling economy. Just look at Spain .

4) Energy is the lifeblood of the American economy – it is, literally, the capacity to do work. Hence, making American energy more expensive and less available will strengthen our economy and enhance our capacity to put Americans to work. Get it?

3) California and Massachusetts have adopted similar policies and they’re now enjoying some of the highest energy prices and unemployment rates in the nation. We need to level the playing field so every state can reap the benefits of expensive energy and abundant joblessness.

2) It will create millions of well-paying green jobs without destroying the jobs of Americans who are currently employed. Who put the green welfare provisions in there, anyway?

1) Reducing economic growth while achieving virtually no environmental benefit is simply a good idea . Don’t ask questions.