Another PTC/ITC Extension for Wind/Solar? Just Say NO

“The continued reliance on ‘clean’ energy tax credits is a political crutch…. Those who have introduced this legislation … should be working to phase out these subsidies more quickly, not doubling down on them.” – Tom Pyle, AEA president (below)

A recent press release by the American Energy Alliance (the advocacy arm of the Institute for Energy Research) called it an “Election-Year Betrayal to Reinstate Wind and Solar Subsidies.” For two energies touting their affordability for consumers, this is disingenuous. Socializing the cost-premium to taxpayers, and unnecessarily industrializing the pristine landscape (real ecologists, please stand up) is bad public policy. And with more than a dozen extensions of the “temporary tax credits” (15 for solar14 for wind), the mirage of competitiveness by an infant industry (not) is exposed.

The full press release follows:

WASHINGTON DC (4/29/26) – Last Thursday, a small group of Republican Congressmen, led by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), introduced legislation to remove the deadlines placed under the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) Act on renewable tax credits, including the Wind Production Tax Credit and the Solar Investment Tax Credit.

American Energy Alliance President Tom Pyle issued the following statement: 

“The continued reliance on ‘clean’ energy tax credits is a political crutch that forces taxpayers to subsidize technologies that clearly cannot stand on their own. Those who have introduced this legislation – many of whom voted to pass the OBBB – should be working to phase out these subsidies more quickly, not doubling down on them.

“With all of these Members facing a battle for reelection, it’s surprising that subsidizing large corporations is their number one priority. Introducing legislation now to eliminate the tax credit deadlines is the obvious bait-and-switch we warned about a year ago, as these members push to revive preferential treatment for their favored industries. As I have said before, extending green giveaways on the backs of taxpayers is shortsighted and neglectful. The American people deserve better than the fast one these Members are trying to pull.” 

AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research on the Master Resource Commentary Blog.

AEA Joins With 35 Free Market Groups to Urge Repeal of Jones Act

On Wednesday, May 6, 2026 the American Energy Alliance joined with 35 other free market advocacy groups in sending a letter to members of Congress. The group, lead by Americans for Prosperity, is urging Congress to immediately pass a full repeal of the Jones Act. The full text of the letter is available below:


Dear Members of Congress,

We commend President Trump’s decision to issue an additional 90-day suspension of the century-old Jones Act, and we ask Congress to make the suspension permanent by repealing this outdated law.

The Jones Act requires cargo shipped domestically to be carried on vessels that are U.S.-built, owned, and flagged and crewed by Americans. While originally intended to strengthen American maritime capabilities, it has become a costly, counterproductive barrier to efficient commerce.

Its repeal is long overdue.

President Trump’s recent waiver to “allow vital resources like oil, natural gas, fertilizer, and coal to flow freely to U.S. ports” underscores the need to repeal this law permanently. Without the Jones Act, markets will function better, supply will increase, and costs will decline. By contrast, every day the law remains in force it constrains supply, stifles competition, and drives up costs for American families. These impacts fall especially hard on residents of noncontiguous states and territories such as Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico.

Beyond its economic toll on average Americans, the Jones Act represents a departure from free-market principles. It distorts competition, protects entrenched interests, and has failed to deliver on its central promise of a robust domestic maritime fleet. A couple of examples.

Today, of the roughly 7,500 oil tankers operating globally, only 54 comply with Jones Act requirements. The situation is worse when it comes to Jones Act-compliant liquid natural gas tankers. We have none – the one currently operating to supply Puerto Rico does so only under an exemption because it was foreign-made. The U.S. can ship natural gas to some 30 countries globally but cannot ship it from one part of the U.S. to another.

The current U.S.-Iran engagement and resulting energy disruptions underscore the urgency of the temporary waiver. But long after the worldwide energy disruptions are gone, the Jones Act will still be making everything cost more – unless it is repealed.

With President Trump’s tremendous leadership, we are confident that Congress can take action to end the Jones Act and help lower the cost of living for all Americans.

Thank you for your leadership and consideration.

Sincerely,

Brent Gardner,
Chief Government Affairs Officer, Americans for Prosperity

John Shelton,
Vice President of Policy, Advancing American Freedom

Phil Kerpen,
President, American Commitment

Tom Pyle,
President, American Energy Alliance

David Ibsen,
Executive Director, Americans for Free Markets

Grover Norquist, President,
Americans for Tax Reform

Caleb Brown,
CEO, Bluegrass Institute

Ryan Ellis,
President, Center for a Free Economy

Daniel J. Mitchell,
President, Center for Freedom and Prosperity

David Ozgo,
Executive Director, Center for Transportation Advancement

John Phelan,
Economist, Center of the American Experiment

Chuck Muth,
President, Citizen Outreach

Tom Schatz,
President, Citizens Against Government Waste

Ryan Young,
Senior Economist & Director of Publications, Competitive Enterprise Institute

John Vick,
Executive Director, Concerned Veterans for America

James Czerniawski,
Head of Emerging Technology Policy, Consumer Choice Center

Jason Pye,
Founder, Exiled Policy

Brian Norman,
Director of State Affairs, Goldwater Institute

Keli’i Akina,
President & CEO, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii

Gabriella Hoffman,
Director, Center for Energy and Conservation, Independent Women’s Forum

Tom Giovanetti,
President, Institute for Policy Innovation

Sara Albrecht,
Chairman and CEO, Liberty Justice Center

Charles Sauer,
Founder & President, Market Institute

Pete Sepp,
President, National Taxpayers Union

Jon Decker,
Senior Fellow, Parkview Institute

Stephen Stepanek,
President, Pine Tree Public Policy LLC

Eric Ventimiglia,
Executive Director, Pinpoint Policy Institute

Jorge L. Rodriguez,
Founder & CEO, Puerto Rico Institute for Economic Liberty

Nan Swift,
Senior Fellow, R Street Institute

Paul Gessing,
President, Rio Grande Foundation
Joshua Sewell,
Director of Research and Policy, Taxpayers for Common Sense

Sandra Benitez,
Executive Director, The LIBRE Initiative
Christopher Butler,
Executive Director, Tholos Foundation

Kent Kaiser,
Executive Director, Trade Alliance to Promote Prosperity

Vance Ginn,
Chief Economist, Trump 45 White House OMB

Casey Given,
Executive Director, Young Voices

President Trump Signs Repeal Of Biden’s Minnesota Mining Ban

On April 16, the U.S. Senate narrowly voted to overturn a 20-year mining ban imposed by the Biden administration on a national forest in northeastern Minnesota. The House had approved the bill on January 21, and President Trump signed it on April 27. The bill reverses the previous administration’s mining ban on 225,504 acres in the Superior National Forest and will allow Twin Metals to begin mining on land controlled by the federal government after obtaining leases from the Trump administration. The company wants to build a copper and nickel mine about five miles southwest of the wilderness area, where an estimated four billion tons of copper and nickel ore are located. The area is believed to hold one of the world’s largest undeveloped mineral deposits.

As The Epoch Times reports, in 2023, President Biden imposed the order to block mining in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and the surrounding watershed located in the Superior National Forest for 20 years, until 2043. The area is a world-class deposit, containing copper, nickel, platinum, palladium, gold, cobalt, and silver. Biden’s Department of the Interior blocked the nearly $3 billion mine over stated concerns about the safety of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness inside the national forest. The Biden administration, however, failed to properly transmit the required notice to Congress about the ban, allowing the vote to overturn the ban to come under the Congressional Review Act, which gives Congress the authority to review and disapprove federal actions within 60 Senate session days of the action’s submission.

The Sierra Club claims that mineral mining bans had not been considered rules that are subject to the Congressional Review Act in past administrations. It and other environmental groups plan to continue their fight against mining in the area. According to Twin Metals, the proposed mine would not cause ecological damage because it would comply with Minnesota’s strict water-quality standards.

According to the New York Times, Twin Metals has not yet decided where to send the copper extracted in Minnesota for processing. As of last year, China controlled more than half of global copper refining, according to data from research firm Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. Copper is a crucial component in many products, including cellphones, electric vehicles, and military aircraft, and it is essential for construction and electrification. The United States is heavily reliant on imported copper from Chile, Canada, and other countries.

Background

The leases sought by Twin Metals date back to the 1960s in an area outside the Boundary Waters wilderness, but within its watershed. The Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) renewed the leases in 1984, and Twin Metals Mining sought an additional 10-year renewal after it acquired the leases in 2012. In 2016, the Obama administration’s Interior Department directed the BLM not to renew the leases amid the possibility of a mining ban in the region. The Trump administration later reversed course by issuing a legal opinion declaring the leases valid and extending them for 10 years.

In 2021, the Biden administration began a review of the potential impacts of mining on the “natural and cultural resources” of the area and placed a two-year pause on new leasing. The following year, Interior canceled the Twin Metals leases, arguing that the Trump-era decision had contained “significant legal deficiencies.” The Twin Metals mining company sued the Biden administration, calling its actions unlawful and contradictory to the nation’s need for “clean” energy. According to Twin Metals’ Dean DeBeltz, “Our plan is backed by decades of exploration and analysis and is rooted in the most environmentally sophisticated design, which is tailored for our project location and mineral deposit. It deserves a fair evaluation by federal regulators based on its merits.”

Analysis

Congress acted wisely to end the Biden administration’s moratoria on mining in northeastern Minnesota, where 95% of the nation’s nickel reserves and 88% of American cobalt reserves are found, as well as copper and other critical minerals. Precluding mines in the United States simply shifts investment and jobs to foreign shores, placing those nations in the driver’s seat of the United States’ energy future. According to a 2025 report, America’s Mineral Reserves: Unlocking Our $12 Trillion Treasure Chest, by Unleash Prosperity, “To support and defend the world’s largest, technology-based, environmentally friendly, and free economy, we must redesign the existing domestic mining permitting and regulatory gauntlet in order to enable the free market to produce the critical minerals and metals that America needs now. Without reliable mineral supply chains, the nation can neither insulate itself from the impacts of global conflict nor protect its domestic interests.”


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

The Unregulated Podcast #272: Send Him Back

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle, Mike McKenna, and Alex Stevens discuss the fallout of UAE’s departure from OPEC, Lee Zeldin’s latest adventures on Capitol Hill, and the continual decline of NYC.

Links:

AEA Joins With 16 Free Market Groups to Urge Passage of REINS Act

On Thursday, April 30, 2026 the American Energy Alliance joined with 16 other free market advocacy groups in sending a letter to the leadership of the Missouri State Senate. The group, lead by American Commitment, is urging Missouri’s Senate leadership to pass the REINS Act immediately. The full text of the letter is available below:


4/30/2026

Dear Missouri Senate Leadership,

The clock is running out on the current legislative session, and with it, a critical opportunity to establish effective legislative control of major regulations in Missouri.  On behalf of the thousands of Missouri constituents and supporters of the signatory organizations, we are writing to urge Senate Leadership to place HB 2559 on the Senate calendar for a vote before adjournment.

For too long, unelected bureaucrats have enjoyed a blank check to bypass the people’s representatives, imposing regulations that carry the full force of law without a single vote being cast by an elected official.  Fourteen states have passed a REINS Act to require affirmative legislative approval of new regulations and break this cycle.  Missouri should join them.

Legislatures, of course, are capable of making bad regulatory decisions, but many of the worst ideas would be stopped and bad ideas that are approved would have to be defended to voters.  Knowing regulations will come back for approval also forces legislators to write better laws to begin with, rather than punting difficult decisions to bureaucrats with broad or vague provisions.

The Missouri REINS Act would require that any proposed regulation with an economic impact exceeding $250,000 must receive explicit approval from the General Assembly before it can take effect.  The bill includes necessary exemptions for emergency rules and federal compliance, ensuring the state can still function during crises.

Polling shows that 75% of Missouri voters believe the legislature should have the final say on regulations that impact the economy. 

This also represents a state-level version of a Trump Administration national priority that has been blocked by Democratic filibuster.  Establishing the principle of legislative accountability at the state level would build momentum for this desperately needed reform to advance at the federal level in the future, as legislators accustomed to this process move to Congress.

If the Senate fails to act now, it would mean refusing to do the basic legislative work of voting on the major regulations that affect the Missouri economy.  We urge you not to let another session slip away while the regulatory burden on Missouri families and businesses grows unchecked.

Sincerely,

Phil Kerpen
American Commitment

Saulius “Saul” Anuzis
American Association of Senior Citizens

Tom Pyle
American Energy Alliance

Grover Norquist
Americans for Tax Reform

Dan Mitchell
Center for Freedom and Prosperity

David McIntosh
Club for Growth

Wayne Crews
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Thomas A. Schatz
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Andrew Langer
CPAC Foundation Center for Regulatory Freedom

George Landrith
Frontiers of Freedom

Seton Motley
Less Government

Charles Sauer
The Market Institute

Gregg Keller
Missouri Century Foundation

Jon Decker
Parkview Institute

James L. Martin
60 Plus Association

David Williams
Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Stephen Moore
Unleash Prosperity Now

Key Vote NO on Bentz Amendment #2

The American Energy Alliance opposes the Bentz amendment #2 (renumbered from 241) to H.R. 7567, the 2026 Farm Bill. This amendment would expand the scope of the already costly and destructive Renewable Fuel Standard program.

This amendment would expand the scope of products eligible for RFS subsidies. Every expansion of product eligibility leads to future higher RFS volume mandates. The RFS already adds as much as 30 cents a gallon to fuel costs, with increasing costs to come from the recently finalized volume mandates for 2026 and 2027. Increasing these compliance costs by adding expanded subsidies to the program is precisely the opposite of what is needed at a time of increasing prices at the pump. Congress should be scaling back the RFS, not expanding it.

A NO vote on amendment #2 to H.R. 7567 is a vote in support of free markets and affordable energy.  Should a vote on this amendment occur, AEA will include it in its American Energy Scorecard.

AEA Calls Out Election-Year Betrayal to Reinstate Wind and Solar Subsidies

WASHINGTON DC (4/29/26) – Last Thursday, a small group of Republican Congressmen, led by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), introduced legislation to remove the deadlines placed under the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) Act on renewable tax credits, including the Wind Production Tax Credit and the Solar Investment Tax Credit.

American Energy Alliance President Tom Pyle issued the following statement: 

“The continued reliance on ‘clean’ energy tax credits is a political crutch that forces taxpayers to subsidize technologies that clearly cannot stand on their own. Those who have introduced this legislation – many of whom voted to pass the OBBB – should be working to phase out these subsidies more quickly, not doubling down on them.

“With all of these Members facing a battle for reelection, it’s surprising that subsidizing large corporations is their number one priority. Introducing legislation now to eliminate the tax credit deadlines is the obvious bait-and-switch we warned about a year ago, as these members push to revive preferential treatment for their favored industries. As I have said before, extending green giveaways on the backs of taxpayers is shortsighted and neglectful. The American people deserve better than the fast one these Members are trying to pull.” 

AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:


For media inquiries please contact: 

[email protected]

Supreme Court Unanimously Rules in Favor of Chevron, Moving Climate Lawfare to Federal Court

WASHINGTON DC (04/23/2026) – On April 17, 2026, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Chevron in Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, allowing the company to move a multimillion-dollar lawsuit tied to its WWII-era federal aviation fuel contract from state to federal court.

American Energy Alliance President Tom Pyle issued the following statement:

“The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in this case is an important one. Though it is a narrow ruling and does not resolve the broader issue of climate litigation, it reinforces a critical argument that may apply in similar cases involving federal oversight – when work conducted under a federal contract is litigated, it belongs before federal courts.

“More broadly, it shows that courts are taking a closer look at the growing number of egregious legal claims against the energy industry, and it is a meaningful step toward limiting the expansion of costly, frivolous, and often unfounded lawfare.”

Background Information:

This case is one of many lawsuits filed by Louisiana parishes against oil companies seeking compensation for alleged damage to the coast and coastal wetlands. Oil companies have raised a variety of defenses in these suits. In this instance, Chevron argued that the drilling operations at issue were related to its World War II–era contracts with the federal government to refine aviation fuel. The company invoked the federal officer removal statute (28 U.S.C. § 1442) to transfer the case from state court to federal court, contending that the activities for which it was being sued were effectively performed at the direction of the federal government.

The court ruled unanimously in Chevron’s favor, holding that the production of crude oil was sufficiently connected to its federal refining contracts to permit removal to federal court. The ruling is grounded specifically in the federal officer removal statute and is not necessarily dispositive for every effort by oil companies to move similar cases to federal court.

However, the federal officer removal statute has been invoked in some of those other cases, particularly where producers acted under federal permits or requirements from the Department of the Interior for development on federal lands. Therefore, this decision could strengthen that defense where it applies. The Supreme Court has granted review this term in Suncor v. Boulder County, which is expected to address the broader issue of federal preemption in climate-related lawsuits against energy companies. Even so, the Chevron decision is a favorable development showing that state tort claims will not simply proceed without meaningful limits. It may also be an encouraging indicator of the Supreme Court’s likely approach in the Suncor case.

AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

Key Vote YES on H.R. 1897

The American Energy Alliance supports H.R. 1897 the ESA Amendments Act of 2025.

It has been decades since the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was meaningfully amended and in that time there have been substantial societal, technological and environmental changes that ESA implementation has not kept pace with. The ESA has become a regulatory weapon rather than focusing on its original mission of actually helping threatened species recover. H.R. 1897 will improve regulatory certainly, create needed flexibility, and allow the federal government to work better with states and landowners. This will result in better outcomes for both species and for landowners.

A YES vote on H.R. 1897 is a vote in support of free markets and affordable energy. AEA will include this vote in its American Energy Scorecard.

U.S. Petroleum Is Powering The World

The Iranian conflict has shifted the global oil market from oversupply to a shortage of 750,000 barrels per day this year. From an expected oil oversupply of 1.63 million barrels per day to an expected average production loss of 2.38 million barrels per day in 2026, which has triggered a surge in spot prices, with oil trading at steep premiums. Spot premiums for U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil are at an all-time high due to competition between Asian and European refiners. According to the Associated Press, despite price increases, the U.S. and global economies are better insulated from oil shocks now than in the 1970s due to energy-efficiency gains, reduced reliance on Middle Eastern oil, strategic stockpiling, and alternative energy sources, including natural gas, nuclear power, and renewables. For example, oil’s share of global energy fell from 51% in 1973 to 34% by 2024, according to the 2025 Statistical Review of World Energy.

According to Reuters, an estimated 136 million barrels of crude oil and products are trapped in the Gulf due to the conflict. Even if shipping is allowed to flow freely through the strait, restoring oil production to pre-conflict levels will likely take months, depending on the extent of damage to oilfields during Iran’s attacks and the resulting shutdowns. A slow return is expected, with around two million to three million barrels per day potentially returning in the first month as export flows resume, followed by another two million to 3.5 million barrels per day over the rest of the second quarter of 2026. There may also be a chance that around one million to two million barrels per day of capacity ​may be permanently lost or limited even after the war, which would set the stage for a tighter market and increased ​price volatility.

In the United States, the shale oil renaissance, driven by hydraulic fracturing and directional drilling, has made the United States the world’s largest oil producer and a net petroleum exporter, with countries turning to it for secure supplies amid OPEC’s lower oil production and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Reuters reports that U.S. refinery utilization rose to ​nearly 92% last month, with Gulf Coast utilization averaging above 95%, up from around 90% a year earlier and a five‑year seasonal average ⁠of about 82%. That has resulted in U.S. refined products exports hitting a record in March. In comparison, Asian refinery utilization slipped to the low- to mid-80% range.

Via Reuters, offers for WTI Midland oil delivered to North Asia in July on very large oil carriers had premiums of $30 to $40 a barrel, depending on the benchmark used, up from premiums of close to $20 a barrel for deals concluded in late March and early April. Bids for WTI Midland delivered to Europe rose to a record premium of nearly $15 per barrel against Brent oil on April 9. Wider discounts ‌on U.S. crude oil compared with global benchmark ​Brent have increased ​demand for tankers on the U.S. Gulf Coast, reducing vessel availability and driving up freight rates.

To soften the shock and potentially keep oil prices somewhat contained, the International Energy Agency’s 32 member countries agreed to release 400 million barrels of oil from their strategic reserves. The United States agreed to release 172 million barrels from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve, established in 1975. President Biden had depleted a large portion of the reserve, drawing it down to 58% of its capacity, to lower gasoline prices ahead of the 2022 midterm elections. At that time, Russia invaded Ukraine, and oil and gasoline prices shot up. President Trump and Energy Secretary Wright have been trying to refill it before the conflict in Iran occurred. The rapid drawdown during the Biden administration also damaged the SPR facilities, necessitating ongoing repairs that have slowed the refill.

Some countries are providing fuel price relief. Reuters reports that Germany has agreed to provide fuel price relief to consumers and businesses worth $1.9 billion. The energy tax on diesel and petrol will be cut by about 0.17 euros per liter for two months. Germany also agreed to let companies pay a 1,000-euro ($1175) relief bonus per employee, exempt from payroll taxes and social security contributions. Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin announced his government will offer new fuel tax cuts amounting to $592 million. The relief measure, which needs parliamentary approval, would come on top of a 250-million-euro ($294 million) tax break approved nearly three weeks ago.

Analysis

The blockage of the Strait of Hormuz is driving up prices for oil and refined products, and the U.S. industry is benefiting. Higher prices mean increased production and refinery utilization to help mitigate the supply shock. More U.S. oil production also helps improve the environmental quality of global production. As we explain in the 2026 Environmental Quality Index, the environmental quality score of the average barrel of oil produced by the U.S. is significantly higher than that of other top-producing countries.


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.