AEA Joins With 16 Free Market Groups to Urge Passage of REINS Act

On Thursday, April 30, 2026 the American Energy Alliance joined with 16 other free market advocacy groups in sending a letter to the leadership of the United States Senate. The group, lead by American Commitment, is urging Senate leadership to pass the REINS Act immediately. The full text of the letter is available below:


4/30/2026

Dear Senate Majority Leader Thune & Majority Whip Barrasso,

The clock is running out on the current legislative session, and with it, a critical opportunity to establish effective legislative control of major regulations in Missouri.  On behalf of the thousands of Missouri constituents and supporters of the signatory organizations, we are writing to urge Senate Leadership to place HB 2559 on the Senate calendar for a vote before adjournment.

For too long, unelected bureaucrats have enjoyed a blank check to bypass the people’s representatives, imposing regulations that carry the full force of law without a single vote being cast by an elected official.  Fourteen states have passed a REINS Act to require affirmative legislative approval of new regulations and break this cycle.  Missouri should join them.

Legislatures, of course, are capable of making bad regulatory decisions, but many of the worst ideas would be stopped and bad ideas that are approved would have to be defended to voters.  Knowing regulations will come back for approval also forces legislators to write better laws to begin with, rather than punting difficult decisions to bureaucrats with broad or vague provisions.

The Missouri REINS Act would require that any proposed regulation with an economic impact exceeding $250,000 must receive explicit approval from the General Assembly before it can take effect.  The bill includes necessary exemptions for emergency rules and federal compliance, ensuring the state can still function during crises.

Polling shows that 75% of Missouri voters believe the legislature should have the final say on regulations that impact the economy. 

This also represents a state-level version of a Trump Administration national priority that has been blocked by Democratic filibuster.  Establishing the principle of legislative accountability at the state level would build momentum for this desperately needed reform to advance at the federal level in the future, as legislators accustomed to this process move to Congress.

If the Senate fails to act now, it would mean refusing to do the basic legislative work of voting on the major regulations that affect the Missouri economy.  We urge you not to let another session slip away while the regulatory burden on Missouri families and businesses grows unchecked.

Sincerely,

Phil Kerpen
American Commitment

Saulius “Saul” Anuzis
American Association of Senior Citizens

Tom Pyle
American Energy Alliance

Grover Norquist
Americans for Tax Reform

Dan Mitchell
Center for Freedom and Prosperity

David McIntosh
Club for Growth

Wayne Crews
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Thomas A. Schatz
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Andrew Langer
CPAC Foundation Center for Regulatory Freedom

George Landrith
Frontiers of Freedom

Seton Motley
Less Government

Charles Sauer
The Market Institute

Gregg Keller
Missouri Century Foundation

Jon Decker
Parkview Institute

James L. Martin
60 Plus Association

David Williams
Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Stephen Moore
Unleash Prosperity Now

Key Vote NO on Bentz Amendment #2

The American Energy Alliance opposes the Bentz amendment #2 (renumbered from 241) to H.R. 7567, the 2026 Farm Bill. This amendment would expand the scope of the already costly and destructive Renewable Fuel Standard program.

This amendment would expand the scope of products eligible for RFS subsidies. Every expansion of product eligibility leads to future higher RFS volume mandates. The RFS already adds as much as 30 cents a gallon to fuel costs, with increasing costs to come from the recently finalized volume mandates for 2026 and 2027. Increasing these compliance costs by adding expanded subsidies to the program is precisely the opposite of what is needed at a time of increasing prices at the pump. Congress should be scaling back the RFS, not expanding it.

A NO vote on amendment #2 to H.R. 7567 is a vote in support of free markets and affordable energy.  Should a vote on this amendment occur, AEA will include it in its American Energy Scorecard.

AEA Calls Out Election-Year Betrayal to Reinstate Wind and Solar Subsidies

WASHINGTON DC (4/29/26) – Last Thursday, a small group of Republican Congressmen, led by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), introduced legislation to remove the deadlines placed under the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) Act on renewable tax credits, including the Wind Production Tax Credit and the Solar Investment Tax Credit.

American Energy Alliance President Tom Pyle issued the following statement: 

“The continued reliance on ‘clean’ energy tax credits is a political crutch that forces taxpayers to subsidize technologies that clearly cannot stand on their own. Those who have introduced this legislation – many of whom voted to pass the OBBB – should be working to phase out these subsidies more quickly, not doubling down on them.

“With all of these Members facing a battle for reelection, it’s surprising that subsidizing large corporations is their number one priority. Introducing legislation now to eliminate the tax credit deadlines is the obvious bait-and-switch we warned about a year ago, as these members push to revive preferential treatment for their favored industries. As I have said before, extending green giveaways on the backs of taxpayers is shortsighted and neglectful. The American people deserve better than the fast one these Members are trying to pull.” 

AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:


For media inquiries please contact: 

[email protected]

Supreme Court Unanimously Rules in Favor of Chevron, Moving Climate Lawfare to Federal Court

WASHINGTON DC (04/23/2026) – On April 17, 2026, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Chevron in Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, allowing the company to move a multimillion-dollar lawsuit tied to its WWII-era federal aviation fuel contract from state to federal court.

American Energy Alliance President Tom Pyle issued the following statement:

“The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in this case is an important one. Though it is a narrow ruling and does not resolve the broader issue of climate litigation, it reinforces a critical argument that may apply in similar cases involving federal oversight – when work conducted under a federal contract is litigated, it belongs before federal courts.

“More broadly, it shows that courts are taking a closer look at the growing number of egregious legal claims against the energy industry, and it is a meaningful step toward limiting the expansion of costly, frivolous, and often unfounded lawfare.”

Background Information:

This case is one of many lawsuits filed by Louisiana parishes against oil companies seeking compensation for alleged damage to the coast and coastal wetlands. Oil companies have raised a variety of defenses in these suits. In this instance, Chevron argued that the drilling operations at issue were related to its World War II–era contracts with the federal government to refine aviation fuel. The company invoked the federal officer removal statute (28 U.S.C. § 1442) to transfer the case from state court to federal court, contending that the activities for which it was being sued were effectively performed at the direction of the federal government.

The court ruled unanimously in Chevron’s favor, holding that the production of crude oil was sufficiently connected to its federal refining contracts to permit removal to federal court. The ruling is grounded specifically in the federal officer removal statute and is not necessarily dispositive for every effort by oil companies to move similar cases to federal court.

However, the federal officer removal statute has been invoked in some of those other cases, particularly where producers acted under federal permits or requirements from the Department of the Interior for development on federal lands. Therefore, this decision could strengthen that defense where it applies. The Supreme Court has granted review this term in Suncor v. Boulder County, which is expected to address the broader issue of federal preemption in climate-related lawsuits against energy companies. Even so, the Chevron decision is a favorable development showing that state tort claims will not simply proceed without meaningful limits. It may also be an encouraging indicator of the Supreme Court’s likely approach in the Suncor case.

AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

Key Vote YES on H.R. 1897

The American Energy Alliance supports H.R. 1897 the ESA Amendments Act of 2025.

It has been decades since the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was meaningfully amended and in that time there have been substantial societal, technological and environmental changes that ESA implementation has not kept pace with. The ESA has become a regulatory weapon rather than focusing on its original mission of actually helping threatened species recover. H.R. 1897 will improve regulatory certainly, create needed flexibility, and allow the federal government to work better with states and landowners. This will result in better outcomes for both species and for landowners.

A YES vote on H.R. 1897 is a vote in support of free markets and affordable energy. AEA will include this vote in its American Energy Scorecard.

U.S. Petroleum Is Powering The World

The Iranian conflict has shifted the global oil market from oversupply to a shortage of 750,000 barrels per day this year. From an expected oil oversupply of 1.63 million barrels per day to an expected average production loss of 2.38 million barrels per day in 2026, which has triggered a surge in spot prices, with oil trading at steep premiums. Spot premiums for U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil are at an all-time high due to competition between Asian and European refiners. According to the Associated Press, despite price increases, the U.S. and global economies are better insulated from oil shocks now than in the 1970s due to energy-efficiency gains, reduced reliance on Middle Eastern oil, strategic stockpiling, and alternative energy sources, including natural gas, nuclear power, and renewables. For example, oil’s share of global energy fell from 51% in 1973 to 34% by 2024, according to the 2025 Statistical Review of World Energy.

According to Reuters, an estimated 136 million barrels of crude oil and products are trapped in the Gulf due to the conflict. Even if shipping is allowed to flow freely through the strait, restoring oil production to pre-conflict levels will likely take months, depending on the extent of damage to oilfields during Iran’s attacks and the resulting shutdowns. A slow return is expected, with around two million to three million barrels per day potentially returning in the first month as export flows resume, followed by another two million to 3.5 million barrels per day over the rest of the second quarter of 2026. There may also be a chance that around one million to two million barrels per day of capacity ​may be permanently lost or limited even after the war, which would set the stage for a tighter market and increased ​price volatility.

In the United States, the shale oil renaissance, driven by hydraulic fracturing and directional drilling, has made the United States the world’s largest oil producer and a net petroleum exporter, with countries turning to it for secure supplies amid OPEC’s lower oil production and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Reuters reports that U.S. refinery utilization rose to ​nearly 92% last month, with Gulf Coast utilization averaging above 95%, up from around 90% a year earlier and a five‑year seasonal average ⁠of about 82%. That has resulted in U.S. refined products exports hitting a record in March. In comparison, Asian refinery utilization slipped to the low- to mid-80% range.

Via Reuters, offers for WTI Midland oil delivered to North Asia in July on very large oil carriers had premiums of $30 to $40 a barrel, depending on the benchmark used, up from premiums of close to $20 a barrel for deals concluded in late March and early April. Bids for WTI Midland delivered to Europe rose to a record premium of nearly $15 per barrel against Brent oil on April 9. Wider discounts ‌on U.S. crude oil compared with global benchmark ​Brent have increased ​demand for tankers on the U.S. Gulf Coast, reducing vessel availability and driving up freight rates.

To soften the shock and potentially keep oil prices somewhat contained, the International Energy Agency’s 32 member countries agreed to release 400 million barrels of oil from their strategic reserves. The United States agreed to release 172 million barrels from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve, established in 1975. President Biden had depleted a large portion of the reserve, drawing it down to 58% of its capacity, to lower gasoline prices ahead of the 2022 midterm elections. At that time, Russia invaded Ukraine, and oil and gasoline prices shot up. President Trump and Energy Secretary Wright have been trying to refill it before the conflict in Iran occurred. The rapid drawdown during the Biden administration also damaged the SPR facilities, necessitating ongoing repairs that have slowed the refill.

Some countries are providing fuel price relief. Reuters reports that Germany has agreed to provide fuel price relief to consumers and businesses worth $1.9 billion. The energy tax on diesel and petrol will be cut by about 0.17 euros per liter for two months. Germany also agreed to let companies pay a 1,000-euro ($1175) relief bonus per employee, exempt from payroll taxes and social security contributions. Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin announced his government will offer new fuel tax cuts amounting to $592 million. The relief measure, which needs parliamentary approval, would come on top of a 250-million-euro ($294 million) tax break approved nearly three weeks ago.

Analysis

The blockage of the Strait of Hormuz is driving up prices for oil and refined products, and the U.S. industry is benefiting. Higher prices mean increased production and refinery utilization to help mitigate the supply shock. More U.S. oil production also helps improve the environmental quality of global production. As we explain in the 2026 Environmental Quality Index, the environmental quality score of the average barrel of oil produced by the U.S. is significantly higher than that of other top-producing countries.


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

The Unregulated Podcast #270: 72 Hours

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna discuss Virginia’s descent into partisan madness, the latest energy updates from the Iran Conflict, new threats to the nation’s electric grid, and more.

Links:

AEA Applauds Energy Champions Senator Cruz and Representative Hageman for Introducing Climate Liability Legislation

WASHINGTON DC (4/17/26) – Yesterday, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) introduced S.4340. This bill would bar frivolous lawsuits from green activist groups seeking damages, injunctions, or other relief for harms allegedly caused by the end use of energy products. Senators Ted Budd (R-NC), Tom Cotton (R-AR), and Mike Lee (R-UT) are cosponsoring the legislation. The House’s companion bill, H.R. 8330, was also introduced yesterday by Representative Harriet Hageman (R-WY).

American Energy Alliance President Tom Pyle released the following statement:

“Green left activists have always gone to extraordinary lengths to impose their anti-energy agenda on Americans. Filing sweeping lawsuits against oil and gas companies in an attempt to force policy outcomes they have failed to achieve in the legislative and administrative arenas is some of their most egregious work yet. This kind of politically motivated litigation threatens not only energy stability, security, and affordability but also the integrity of our legal system.

“We applaud Senator Cruz and Representative Hageman for taking the lead on this issue and introducing legislation to end climate lawfare. We look forward to working with them to end this reckless assault on affordable and reliable energy once and for all.”

AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:

For media inquiries, please contact:
[email protected]

American Energy Alliance Leads Coalition Letter in Support of American Energy Security and Competitiveness

WASHINGTON DC (04/16/2026) – Today, a coalition of 24 organizations, led by the American Energy Alliance, sent a letter to President Donald Trump and members of the United States Congress, urging a disciplined, evidence-based approach to rail regulation to ensure American energy security and economic competitiveness.

American Energy Alliance President Tom Pyle released the following statement:

“Reliable, affordable American energy relies not only on what we produce, but on how effectively and efficiently we move it. Rail transportation is critical for the movement of coal and crude, and linking production operations to manufacturers and export terminals. Policies that increase the cost and complexity of moving our resources, like the proposed Rail Safety Act, will inevitably affect our supply chains. The end result is higher energy prices for families and businesses across the country.

“This administration and this Congress have worked relentlessly to strengthen domestic supply chains and bolster energy security. Imposing sweeping new operational mandates on the way we transport that energy risks undermining those very goals. Burdensome new regulations will only hinder the long-term investments needed to maintain safe, efficient, and resilient energy transportation systems.”

AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:

For media inquiries, please contact:
[email protected]

New LNG Projects Promise To Make Alaska Great Again

The conflict with Iran could lead to the construction of an Alaskan natural gas pipeline and export project. One project in the works since 2014 would entail an 810-mile pipeline to bring natural gas south from wells on the state’s North Slope for liquefaction and shipment to Asian customers. The project is estimated at $44 billion. The effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz and Iranian attacks on Qatari liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants are driving soaring LNG prices in Asia and Europe, prompting customers to seek more stable and secure supplies. That has accelerated interest in turning preliminary purchase plans into firm contracts and pricing deals, particularly from Asian customers, who get most of their oil and natural gas from the Middle East. In addition to benefiting the international market, the pipeline will provide a stable supply for Alaskan home heating, power generation, and industrial needs, while eliminating the need to import gas into Alaska. The “final investment decision” is expected to come within weeks.

Another potential way to move stranded North Slope gas (about 35 trillion cubic feet) to market was announced by Polar LNG. According to the Oil & Gas Journal, this LNG facility would use existing Prudhoe Bay infrastructure, transporting gas via a short pipeline to a modular, nearshore gravity-based facility that would process and liquefy it. The gas would then be loaded onto specialized ice-class carriers for year-round export. The company is planning to begin production at the seven-million-metric-ton-per-year plant between 2029 and 2030, at a cost of $8–9 billion.

According to Semafor, Polar LNG is exploring the potential repurposing of sanctioned equipment built for Russia’s Arctic LNG 2 project and is seeking permission from the US government to acquire parts affected by the Biden administration’s sanctions. Obtaining pre-built equipment is critical to meeting the project’s timeline. The project, when completed, would have one of the shortest LNG shipping routes from North America to key Asian markets, approximately 3,600 miles to Japan, for example, compared to over 10,000 miles from the U.S. Gulf Coast.

While cheaper, Polar LNG faces severe challenges of transiting ice-laden waters. As The Alaska Story reports, a Russian gas project has not been able to deliver shipments recently due to icebreaker breakdowns, and Russia has a much larger icebreaker fleet than the United States. Russia’s Arctic LNG 2 project is operating at only about 25% capacity because the ice is too thick for most tankers, so it relies on a single ice-class tanker to move fuel.

The Polar LNG project is complementary to the pipeline LNG project, which is partnered by the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation and the privately owned Glenfarne. Alaska has 25% ownership in the project. According to Governor Mike Dunleavy and Former Senator Mark Begich, the pipeline project has received its Federal Energy Regulatory Commission certificate and Department of Energy license. The necessary engineering has been completed, permits have been obtained, and lawsuits are over. The right-of-way is secured, and the gas is available to put into the pipe. Buyers in Japan, South Korea, and other Pacific partners have expressed interest in purchasing its gas rather than relying on Middle Eastern gas. Furthermore, the pipeline project will supply the needed gas to Southcentral Alaska to heat Alaskan homes and fuel military bases, while also creating more jobs.

The final holdup is with the mayors of the boroughs through which the pipeline will transit. Governor Dunleavy has a bill that would replace a statewide $20 million property tax on oil and gas infrastructure, split between state and local governments, with a volumetric tax based on the volume of gas flowing through pipelines. According to the borough mayors, the volumetric tax would bring in far less revenue than the property tax — about 90% less, which would not be enough to cover local costs, such as additional students in schools, more vehicles on the road, and more fire and EMS calls, resulting in some of the project’s cost having to be paid by local taxpayers.

Analysis

The energy crisis resulting from the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz due to the war with Iran is causing new interest in energy from Alaska’s North Slope. Alaska has the potential to be an energy powerhouse. As IER President Tom Pyle wrote for RealClearEnergy, “We cannot afford to keep Alaska locked up any longer. If we are serious about American energy independence and prosperity, the time is now to let Alaska do what it does best – develop and produce its God-given natural resources.”


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.