The Unregulated Podcast #205: So Much Joy

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna give their final thoughts on the World Series and the race for the White House.

Links:

Stay Connected With The Show:

Political Parties and Energy: 2024 Edition

In the United States our federal politics consists largely of a two-party affair. In light of this, the American Energy Alliance has endorsed Donald Trump for president, as he represents the most likely path to unleashing American energy production. 

There are, however, multiple choices on the Presidential ballot this year. To better understand the variety of viewpoints present in the national conversation on energy policy I have prepared a review of the candidates’ energy platforms. Below you will find one quotation from each, giving a flavor of the range, from total free market reliance to socialism/nationalization. 

In order of energy freedom (most to least), six positions follow.

Libertarian Party

While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production.

Republican Party

Republicans will increase Energy Production across the board, streamline permitting, and end market-distorting restrictions on Oil, Natural Gas, and Coal.

Democrat Party

The Administration has rallied the world to commit for the first time to transitioning away from fossil fuels…. As Democrats, we believe the United States has an indispensable role to play in solving the climate crisis, and we have an obligation to help other nations carry out this work.

Green Party

A Jill Stein Administration will advance the ecosocialist Real Green New Deal that the Green Party made its signature issue in the 2010s.

Cornel West

Nationalization of the Fossil Fuel Industry is a bold stride toward dismantling the engines of environmental destruction. By transitioning control to the people, we can decisively phase out the relics of our carbon-dependent past and pave the way for a renewable, just future while caring for those whose livelihoods must evolve in this new dawn.

The Party for Socialism and Liberation

The climate catastrophe demonstrates the disastrous self-interest of the capitalist class. To avoid excessive warming, as well as the many severe environmental threats produced by capitalism, it is necessary to shift from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

For a more indepth review of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris’ energy platforms please visit AEA’s Presidential Platform Comparison Page, a part of our Vote Energy 2024 initiative. 


Robert L. Bradley Jr. is the founder of the Institute for Energy Research, AEA’s sister organization and is one of the nation’s leading experts on the history and regulation of energy markets.

*The views presented in Energy Townhall  by AEA’s experts in their own capacity do not necessarily represent the views of AEA.

Rep. Yadira Caraveo is Out of Step With Her District

Last month, the American Energy Alliance released the 2024 American Energy Scorecard for the House of Representatives.  The AEA scorecard scores voting and co-sponsorship decisions on legislation affecting energy and environmental policy, educating voters on how their representatives vote and holding members accountable for those decisions.    

The scorecard is guided by principles such as: 

  • Promoting affordable, abundant, and reliable energy
  • Expanding economic opportunity and prosperity, particularly for working families and those on fixed incomes
  • Giving Americans, not Washington bureaucrats, the power to make their own energy choices
  • Encouraging private sector innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Advancing market-oriented energy and environment policies
  • Reducing the role of government in energy markets
  • Eliminating the subsidies, mandates, and special interest giveaways that lead to higher energy costs

This year’s American Energy Scorecard compiled 21 votes from the 118th Congress.  90 House members achieved a 100% score.

While many members failed to achieve a perfect score for various reasons, the most concerning scores came from those representing districts where the energy industry is a major economic driver and job creator.  One of these members is Rep. Yadira Caraveo, whose Colorado’s 8th Congressional District includes rich oil and gas lands north of Denver.

Rep. Caraveo did not just score poorly.  Her 33% score placed him near the bottom of the body along with extreme anti-energy members like Green New Deal creator Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  Rep. Caraveo is clearly out of step with her constituents in the 8th district.  Her voting record might pass in New York City, but it’s not acceptable for his energy-producing district.

It also cannot be considered an accident.  AEA notifies all members in advance of votes that will be scored.  A member disagreeing with AEA’s position on one or two votes might be understandable, but Rep. Caraveo shows a consistent record of votes that restrict Americans’ access to affordable and reliable energy.  Her record of voting against the interests of his constituents should be on the minds of voters in 2024.

Rep. Matt Cartwright is Out of Step With His District

Last month, the American Energy Alliance released the 2024 American Energy Scorecard for the House of Representatives.  The AEA scorecard scores voting and co-sponsorship decisions on legislation affecting energy and environmental policy, educating voters on how their representatives vote and holding members accountable for those decisions.  

The scorecard is guided by principles such as: 

  • Promoting affordable, abundant, and reliable energy
  • Expanding economic opportunity and prosperity, particularly for working families and those on fixed incomes
  • Giving Americans, not Washington bureaucrats, the power to make their own energy choices
  • Encouraging private sector innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Advancing market-oriented energy and environment policies
  • Reducing the role of government in energy markets
  • Eliminating the subsidies, mandates, and special interest giveaways that lead to higher energy costs

This year’s American Energy Scorecard compiled 21 votes from the 118th Congress.  90 House members achieved a 100% score.

While many members failed to achieve a perfect score for various reasons, the most concerning scores came from those representing districts where the energy industry is a major economic driver and job creator.  One of these members is Rep. Matt Cartwright, whose Pennsylvania’s 8th Congressional District sits on the edge of the Marcellus shale development.

Rep. Cartwright did not just score poorly.  His 5% score placed him near the bottom of the body along with extreme anti-energy members like Green New Deal creator Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  Rep. Cartwright is clearly out of step with his constituents in the 8th district.  His voting record might pass in New York City, but it’s not acceptable for his energy-producing district.

It also cannot be considered an accident.  AEA notifies all members in advance of votes that will be scored.  A member disagreeing with AEA’s position on one or two votes might be understandable, but Rep. Cartwright shows a consistent record of votes that restrict Americans’ access to affordable and reliable energy.  His record of voting against the interests of his constituents should be on the minds of voters in 2024.

Rep. Henry Cuellar is Out of Step With His District

Last month, the American Energy Alliance released the 2024 American Energy Scorecard for the House of Representatives.  The AEA scorecard scores voting and co-sponsorship decisions on legislation affecting energy and environmental policy, educating voters on how their representatives vote and holding members accountable for those decisions.  

The scorecard is guided by principles such as: 

  • Promoting affordable, abundant, and reliable energy
  • Expanding economic opportunity and prosperity, particularly for working families and those on fixed incomes
  • Giving Americans, not Washington bureaucrats, the power to make their own energy choices
  • Encouraging private sector innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Advancing market-oriented energy and environment policies
  • Reducing the role of government in energy markets
  • Eliminating the subsidies, mandates, and special interest giveaways that lead to higher energy costs

This year’s American Energy Scorecard compiled 21 votes from the 118th Congress.  90 House members achieved a 100% score.

While many members failed to achieve a perfect score for various reasons, the most concerning scores came from those representing districts where the energy industry is a major economic driver and job creator.  One of these members is Rep. Henry Cuellar, whose 28th Congressional district includes portions of the Eagle Ford Shale Geographical Area.

Rep. Cuellar did not just score poorly.  His 62% score placed him near the bottom of the body along with extreme anti-energy members like Green New Deal creator Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  Rep. Cuellar is clearly out of step with his constituents in Texas.  His voting record might pass in New York City, but it’s not acceptable for his energy-producing district.

It also cannot be considered an accident.  AEA notifies all members in advance of votes that will be scored.  A member disagreeing with AEA’s position on one or two votes might be understandable, but Rep. Cuellar shows a consistent record of votes that restrict Americans’ access to affordable and reliable energy. His record of voting against the interests of his constituents should be on the minds of voters in 2024.

Rep. Mary Sattler Peltola is Out of Step With Her District

Last month, the American Energy Alliance released the 2024 American Energy Scorecard for the House of Representatives.   The AEA scorecard scores voting and co-sponsorship decisions on legislation affecting energy and environmental policy, educating voters on how their representatives vote and holding members accountable for those decisions.  

The scorecard is guided by principles such as: 

  • Promoting affordable, abundant, and reliable energy
  • Expanding economic opportunity and prosperity, particularly for working families and those on fixed incomes
  • Giving Americans, not Washington bureaucrats, the power to make their own energy choices
  • Encouraging private sector innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Advancing market-oriented energy and environment policies
  • Reducing the role of government in energy markets
  • Eliminating the subsidies, mandates, and special interest giveaways that lead to higher energy costs

This year’s American Energy Scorecard compiled 21 votes from the 118th Congress.  90 House members achieved a 100% score.

While many members failed to achieve a perfect score for various reasons, the most concerning scores came from those representing districts where the energy industry is a major economic driver and job creator.  One of these members is Rep. Mary Sattler Peltola, whose Alaska’s At-Large Congressional District includes rich oil and gas lands of ANWR.

Rep. Peltola did not just score poorly.  Her 37% score placed him near the bottom of the body along with extreme anti-energy members like Green New Deal creator Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  Rep. Peltola is clearly out of step with her constituents in Alaska.  Her voting record might pass in New York City, but it’s not acceptable for his energy-producing district.

It also cannot be considered an accident.  AEA notifies all members in advance of votes that will be scored.  A member disagreeing with AEA’s position on one or two votes might be understandable, but Rep. Peltola shows a consistent record of votes that restrict Americans’ access to affordable and reliable energy.  Her record of voting against the interests of his constituents should be on the minds of voters in 2024.

Rep. Gabe Vasquez is Out of Step With His District

Last month, the American Energy Alliance released the 2024 American Energy Scorecard for the House of Representatives.  The AEA scorecard scores voting and co-sponsorship decisions on legislation affecting energy and environmental policy, educating voters on how their representatives vote and holding members accountable for those decisions.  

The scorecard is guided by principles such as: 

  • Promoting affordable, abundant, and reliable energy
  • Expanding economic opportunity and prosperity, particularly for working families and those on fixed incomes
  • Giving Americans, not Washington bureaucrats, the power to make their own energy choices
  • Encouraging private sector innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Advancing market-oriented energy and environment policies
  • Reducing the role of government in energy markets
  • Eliminating the subsidies, mandates, and special interest giveaways that lead to higher energy costs

This year’s American Energy Scorecard compiled 21 votes from the 118th Congress.  90 House members achieved a 100% score.

While many members failed to achieve a perfect score for various reasons, the most concerning scores came from those representing districts where the energy industry is a major economic driver and job creator.  One of these members is Rep. Gabe Vasquez, whose New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District includes the southern half of New Mexico and a sizable portion of the Permian Basin – one of the most prolific oil & gas basins in the United States.

Rep. Vasquez did not just score poorly.  His 19% score placed him near the bottom of the body along with extreme anti-energy members like Green New Deal creator Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.  Rep. Vasques is clearly out of step with his constituents in the 2nd district.  His voting record might pass in New York City, but it’s not acceptable for his energy-producing district.

It also cannot be considered an accident.  AEA notifies all members in advance of votes that will be scored.  A member disagreeing with AEA’s position on one or two votes might be understandable, but Rep. Vasquez shows a consistent record of votes that restrict Americans’ access to affordable and reliable energy.   His record of voting against the interests of his constituents should be on the minds of voters in 2024. 

The Unregulated Podcast #204: I Believe That’s Pronounced Commie

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna give their takes on the latest hot takes on the 2024 election. As the race for the White House comes down the home stretch nothing is off the table.

Links:

Stay Connected With The Show:

10 Questions for Vice President Kamala Harris Ahead of Her Town Hall in Pennsylvania

WASHINGTON DC (10/23/24) – Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris will be participating in a Town Hall Forum this evening hosted by CNN in Pennsylvania, the second largest natural gas producer in the country. In advance of this event, the American Energy Alliance has prepared ten questions for Anderson Cooper to ask Vice President Harris:

  1. Your environmental allies have proudly boasted about your history of “standing up to Big Oil.” The oil and gas industry supports more than 423,000 direct and indirect jobs in Pennsylvania and contributes more than $75 billion to the state’s economy. You have a long track record of trying to punish domestic energy production, including over 250 actions the Biden-Harris administration has made it harder to produce oil and gas domestically. Why have you and your administration worked so hard to impede the production of oil and natural gas in the United States?
  2. Pennsylvania is the second largest natural gas producer in the country, producing almost 22% of total US production. Over half of households rely on natural gas, the most cost-effective option, to heat their homes. Fracking, which in 2020 you said you are in favor of banning, provides cheap and abundant energy for American consumers. If you no longer oppose fracking, what would you specifically do to encourage more of it? Can you name five things you have done either as Vice President or as U.S. Senator to increase domestic oil and gas production?
  3. At a recent campaign event in Michigan, you stated “Contrary to what my opponent is suggesting, I will never tell you what kind of car you have to drive.” This is despite your long-standing support for policies that would ban gas-powered cars and trucks and mandate electric vehicles in their place. More than half of Pennsylvanians oppose electric vehicle mandates, which you have long supported, and your administration has tried to implement. If you truly have reversed your support for mandating electric vehicles, why haven’t you, as President of the Senate, encouraged Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to bring legislation to the floor to prevent EV mandates? As the sitting Vice President, why haven’t you taken any action to stop your own EV rules from moving forward?
  4. The Biden-Harris administration halted all new LNG export permits, a move that even Pennsylvania’s Democratic Senators John Fetterman and Bob Casey, as well as Democratic Governor Josh Shapiro have spoken out against. Analysts at Poten & Partners indicate that this ongoing uncertainty is leading to increased costs and project delays. Lengthened timelines, rising engineering costs, procurement, and construction expenses, along with methane emissions fees, are impacting projects awaiting approval or final investment decisions. The broader U.S. LNG industry is also feeling the effects, with many projects needing to reapply or seek extensions. LNG facilities are highly labor- and capital-intensive, showcasing some of the most advanced engineering today. For instance, the Golden Pass facilities are expected to generate $34 billion in private sector investments, contribute $5 billion in taxes, and create 5,200 jobs over their operational lifespan. This pause jeopardizes these potential benefits. Why does your administration prefer that Middle Eastern dictatorships sell LNG instead of U.S. companies?  
  5. You have proudly stated you cast the tie-breaking vote to increase leases for fracking, but that is fully taken out of context. You cast your vote for the Inflation Reduction Act, which doubles rental fees on onshore leases, imposes a new fee to simply nominate acreage to be leased, and increases onshore royalty rates to 16 2/3% from 12.5% under the previous administration. It also imposes a new natural gas tax on U.S. oil and natural gas companies. Consequently, under your administration, the number of new leases has fallen by 88% since FY2019 and is 84% lower even than the average new leases issued during the Obama administration. How can you tout oil production when your administration hasn’t even kept pace with the leasing that took place during the Obama administration?
  6. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), Canada supplies most of the oil used in the upper Midwest and Canada makes up 60% of our total oil imports. Why did the Biden-Harris administration, on day one, stop the Keystone XL Pipeline from Canada, killing thousands of good-paying union jobs for American workers?
  7. The EIA said last week that energy prices this winter will be 11% higher than last year in the Midwest, which is more than your worst year of inflation under Bidenomics. How can you reassure Americans worried about their utility bills that you won’t be cutting off their energy supplies given your statements in the past on banning fracking?
  8.  You have touted a “just transition” to renewable energy, but on your watch, electricity rates are up 27%. During this same period, input prices for coal, oil, and natural gas have remained relatively low, leading critics to suggest that your policies pushing an “energy transition” are what is fueling the rise in electricity prices. Is driving people into energy poverty a feature of your energy plan? Are you willing to commit to embracing affordability and reliability as the cornerstones of a sensible approach to energy policy?
  9.  Your policies focus on the electrification of everything, but electrification relies on minerals that come from China, not the United States. At the same time, a key talking point your administration uses to promote the “energy transition” is the idea that it will all be done in America. However, your administration has stopped mining projects in the United States. How do you square the stated goals of a “built-in-America” energy transition with the build-nothing policies your administration has actually pursued?
  10. Your administration had no problem selling millions of dollars from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in the run-up to the midterm elections of 2022 in an attempt to reduce the price at the pump. Why doesn’t your administration also support increasing domestic oil production as a way to reduce gasoline prices for American motorists more effectively and sustainably? 

AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:


For media inquiries please contact: 

[email protected]

American Energy Alliance Launches Pipeline Protection Project

WASHINGTON DC (10/22/24) – Today, the American Energy Alliance launched a new initiative, the Pipeline Protection Project, to hold green activist groups accountable for their efforts to stop the building of new pipelines and shine a spotlight on the tactics deployed by many of these pressure groups – including excusing violence and vandalism under the banner of free speech – that place affordable and reliable energy at risk.

 AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement: 

“Our nation’s energy infrastructure is critical to ensuring reliable and affordable energy for all Americans. For too long, many radical activist groups have gotten away with destructive and sometimes illegal actions that jeopardize the safety of workers, communities, and the environment they claim to protect. The effort to stop the important and necessary work of building out our energy infrastructure, especially pipelines, impacts all of us.

Affordable and reliable energy heats our homes, powers our businesses, and fuels our economy. We stand firm in our commitment to promoting energy security for all Americans and to exposing these groups for the misinformation, destruction of property, violence, and other misdeeds they perform in their pursuit of stopping new energy projects. Enough is enough. These groups must be held accountable for their efforts to compromise our energy security.”


AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:


For media inquiries please contact: 

[email protected]