American Energy Alliance Applauds Congressional Action to Reverse Biden Administration’s Lockout of Federal Lands

WASHINGTON DC (11/19/25) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) applauds the House of Representatives for passing three Congressional Review Act resolutions that overturn restrictive Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rules and plans imposed by the Biden administration. These rules and plans were designed to lock up responsible energy development on federal lands in Wyoming and Alaska.

The three resolutions passed yesterday are:

  • H.J. Res. 130 – Disapproving a BLM resource management plan that severely limits energy development in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin. Passed 214–212 with 7 members abstaining.
  • H.J. Res. 131 – Disapproving a BLM leasing stipulation that effectively closes the Alaska Coastal Plain to oil and gas activity. Passed 217–209 with 7 members abstaining.
  • S.J. Res. 80 – Disapproving a BLM resource management plan that restricts development in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska (NPR-A). Passed 216–209 with 8 members abstaining.

Tom Pyle, President of the American Energy Alliance, issued the following statement:

AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #253: Peak Idiocracy

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna provide a post-mortem of the government shutdown, look into the imploding climate alarmist movement, the looming battle over data-center energy consumption and a litany of energy stories coming out of the North-East.

Links:

Trump Unleashes Alaska’s Energy Potential

The Trump administration finalized plans to open the 1.5 million-acre coastal plain of Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to potential oil and gas drilling and is planning an oil and gas lease sale in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPR-A). The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has called for nominations for areas to auction in the NPR-A, the first step in the leasing process. The One Big Beautiful Bill, passed this summer, requires the BLM to hold at least four lease sales within ANWR over the next seven years and at least five lease sales in the NPR-A, offering at least four million acres each, over the next 10 years.

Via the Associated Press, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum also announced the completion of a land exchange agreement allowing the construction of a road through the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge. For years, King Cove residents have pushed for a land route to the all-weather airport in Cold Bay, which they consider essential for emergency medical access. The planned road would be an 11-mile, single-lane gravel route limited to noncommercial use and is not expected to significantly impact wildlife.

NPR-A

More than 18.5 million of the reserve’s 23 million acres (82%) on the Western North Slope are designated as available for leasing under the Trump administration. Lease sales in the reserve were held about every two years from 1999 to 2010 and annually from 2011 through 2019. No lease sales in the NPR-A have been held since the 2019 auction during the first Trump administration. With the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill, requiring at least five lease sales, BLM is taking comments on suggested leasing areas for 30 days, through November 21, 2025.

According to the Alaska Beacon, unlike the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge on the eastern North Slope, the National Petroleum Reserve on the western side has attracted substantial industry interest. Beneath the reserve lies the oil-rich Nanushuk formation, which has produced major discoveries on both federal and state lands — some of which are already in production, with more expected. ConocoPhillips’ massive Willow project, estimated to yield up to 180,000 barrels per day from reserves of roughly 600 million barrels, is located within the reserve and is poised to become the westernmost producing oil field on the North Slope. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the NPR-A is estimated to contain approximately 896 million barrels of conventional, undiscovered oil.

Source: U.S. Geological Survey

ANWR

Via the Alaska Beacon, two lease sales in ANWR were held, one in January 2021 and one in January 2025, mandated by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The first of those sales drew bids from the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, an Alaska state development agency. The January 2021 lease sale was held at the end of Trump’s first term and drew only state interest because Biden had already been certified as president and was on record supporting policies to “end fossil fuels.” In 2023, the Biden administration canceled the oil and gas leases. A federal judge in March said the Biden administration lacked authority to cancel the leases, and Trump’s Interior Department restored them.

The second lease sale in 2025 drew no bids due to the Biden administration making it too restrictive in scope. The Biden administration’s leasing proposal incorporated a range of drilling restrictions, including designating over one million acres of the coastal plain as off-limits for leasing and prohibiting any surface development on 58% of the land involved in the sale. Of the 400,000 acres set to be leased, the BLM anticipated that only 995 surface acres would be developed, as the majority of the drilling would access resources beneath the surface.

Alaska was convinced that the Biden administration deliberately wrote the environmental impact statement and conditions for the sale to draw the fewest and lowest possible bids. The state filed a lawsuit against the Interior Department in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, seeking judicial review of the lease sale plan. Alaska argued that the Biden administration plan violated the 2017 Tax Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.

According to the BLM, the 1,563,500-acre Coastal Plain of the ANWR is a frontier basin with strong potential for oil and gas development. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the area is estimated to contain between 4.25 and 11.8 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil.

Source: Bureau of Land Management

Analysis

Alaska can be the next frontier for American energy abundance if federal regulators get out of the way. With substantial oil and gas reserves, the state has the resources necessary to help meet the supply needs of the U.S. and the rest of the world. Allowing for new lease sales in the ANWR and NPR-A are just two recent steps that the Trump administration has taken to allow Alaska to meet its potential. As IER’s Tom Pyle wrote in RealClearEnergy, “Washington is signaling that Alaska will no longer be viewed solely as a playground for the elite. Equally important, the administration and Congress are committed to streamlining permitting and ending the practice of using bureaucratic delay as a tool of obstruction. These shifts are a clear recognition that Alaska is a cornerstone of America’s energy security.”


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

Key Votes YES on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, and S.J. Res. 80

The American Energy Alliance supports H.J. Res. 130, providing for congressional disapproval of a certain resource management plan in Wyoming; H.J. Res. 131, providing for congressional disapproval of a BLM leasing plan for the Alaska coastal plain; and S.J. Res. 80, providing for congressional disapproval of a BLM resource plan for the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska.

All three of these BLM decisions sought to shut down energy development on federal lands in pursuit of the Biden administration’s radical environmental goals and contrary to the will of Congress. Both the National Petroleum Reserve and the Alaska coastal plain were specifically set aside for oil and gas development by Congress. Federal lands in the Powder River Basin have been developed as part of Congress’s directive that federal lands be open for energy exploration and production.

These restrictive BLM plans reflect the priorities of radical environmentalists in Washington, DC, not the actual states and communities being harmed. They should never have been finalized in the first place and Congress is right to reverse these draconian restrictions.

YES votes on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131 and S.J. Res 80 are votes in support of free markets and affordable energy. AEA will include these votes in its American Energy Scorecard.

The Unregulated Podcast: #252 The Greatest Single Experiment in Government, Ever

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna look to the future of domestic energy production, Trump’s tariff agenda, and more.

Links:

The Unregulated Podcast #251 World Class Pivot

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna look into the government shutdown, speculate what Congress will take on next, and go through the latest news from the climate alarmist camp.

Links:

A Firm Commitment to Energy Dominance Requires a Commitment to Offshore Production

WASHINGTON DC (10/30/2025) – A recent Politico report highlights that many elected officials who champion strong energy production oppose offshore drilling when it could impact their own state’s coastlines.

American Energy Alliance President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement:

“The federal government manages a mineral estate of 1.76 billion acres offshore, most of which remains off limits to energy production. Our elected leaders need to stop selectively endorsing domestic production. American energy security must be embraced fully, not only when it occurs on someone else’s doorstep. U.S. offshore waters are part of the American energy portfolio, and many of the Members now seeking to stop development off the shores of their home states voted for this when they voted for the Big Beautiful Bill. Our country deserves a coherent domestic energy strategy driven by facts, and by the belief in American energy exceptionalism, not by coastal opposition to projects in one’s own backyard.”


AEA Experts Available For Interview On This Topic:

Additional Background Resources From AEA:

For media inquiries please contact: 

[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #250: Brusque

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna discuss the retreat from climate change alarmism around the world, the prospects of the government re-opening, the chances of upsets in the upcoming election, and more stories from the world of energy.

Links:

Trump Administration Saves Taxpayers From Another Solar Boondoggle

The Trump administration canceled the proposed Esmeralda 7 Solar Project in Nevada that would have been among the world’s largest solar power facilities and the largest in the United States. According to UPI News, the 6.2-gigawatt project would have built seven solar power-generation projects with battery storage within the Esmeralda site that would have occupied 118,000 acres of land in Nevada’s Esmeralda County and about 30 miles west of Tonopah and 270 miles northwest of Las Vegas. In addition to covering a huge area of desert lands, the project would have also included miles of roads and associated transmission lines.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) recently canceled the environmental impact statement of the proposed facility, canceling the project. According to Politico, in July 2024, the BLM under the Biden administration issued a draft programmatic environmental impact statement for the project and had planned to issue a final review document in April, but it was delayed under the Trump administration.

Some believe that the project may not be dead. The Department of the Interior indicated that developers could still get permits for their individual projects. NextEra Energy, one of the developers, plans to continue its work. Other developers include Leeward Renewable Energy, Arevia Power, ConnectGen, and Invenergy. Each subproject would need its own full review, new environmental studies, and new mitigation plans.

Source: The Nevada Independent

Actions of the Trump Administration

Interior Secretary Burgum directed his department to eliminate policies granting “preferential treatment” for wind and solar development on federal lands and waters and issued guidance stating that he would review procedural decisions for those projects. The order authorizes Burgum to conduct “elevated review” of activities ranging from leases to rights of way, construction and operational plans, and grants and biological opinions. He also signed an order that requires Interior to consider “capacity density” when evaluating solar and wind projects because they take up more land than other kinds of energy, taking over coveted farmland.

The new review requirements for wind and solar projects have slowed their development and have canceled some. The Interior Department is also investigating bird deaths and other impacts on wildlife and plant life by large solar and wind projects. The Esmeralda 7 project, for example, would have negatively impacted archaeological sites, rare plants, bighorn sheep habitat, and wilderness quality lands.

Other Solar Projects Await Action

Via Politicoat least 35 commercial-scale solar power projects that were under preliminary review by BLM when President Trump took office still await action, including final environmental impact statements for the 700-megawatt-capacity Copper Rays Solar Project, the 400-megawatt Purple Sage Solar Project, and the 300-megawatt Bonanza Solar Project, all of which are located in Nevada. Another Nevada solar power project, New Era Energy’s 200-megawatt Dodge Flat II, is still in progress and is expected to generate power by June 2027. Nevada’s vast open lands, marked by mining and sparse populations, are considered ideal testbeds for large-scale solar. Nevada already has more solar jobs per capita than any other state, according to 2023 Interstate Renewable Energy Council data.

Two major solar projects that were issued records of decision in the final weeks of the Biden administration are in limbo — the 600-megawatt Jove Solar Project in southwest Arizona and the 400-megawatt Rough Hat Clark County Solar Project in southern Nevada.

Analysis

Solar and wind are intermittent technologies dependent on the weather to create energy. When the sun is not shining and the wind is not blowing, they must be backed up by other reliable technologies, usually gas or coal, or very expensive, large storage batteries that collect excess electricity when available. The costs of the backup technology are generally not considered when the costs of wind and solar power are discussed, making them seem less expensive than what they are on a system cost and comparable basis.

While the flaws of solar and wind projects raise questions regarding the extent to which federal land managers should prioritize their construction, Interior’s cancellation of the Esmeralda 7 Solar Project continues the trend — started by President Obama’s cancellation of the Keystone XL Pipeline — of presidents canceling energy projects they disapprove of for political reasons. Preventing future abuses of presidential power requires Congressional action limiting presidential discretion over approving projects.


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

The Unregulated Podcast #249: Who Cares?

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna discuss the ongoing government shutdown and how the upcoming elections in Virginia will unfold. Plus, Anthony Huston, CEO of Graphite One, joins the show for a discussion on the future of North American graphite production.

Links: