Fracking and Federalism

 

A funny thing has happened in the fracking wars: All of a sudden, the interventionist groups who are usually fans of centralized power—such as having the federal government issue edicts on carbon emissions—all of a sudden have discovered the virtues of federalism. Specifically, they don’t want state governments limiting the ability of local governments to regulate or even put a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing.

For example, from this news story about a legal battle in upstate New York, we read:

Lenape Resources’ high profile lawsuit versus the Town of Avon was heard by New York State Supreme Court Judge Robert Wiggins in Geneseo on Monday.

Lenape, a local producer of natural gas, has challenged the legal right of the Town of Avon to regulate drilling and recovery of natural gas within the township. On June 28, 2012, in a split 3-to-2 vote, the Avon Town Board enacted a one-year moratorium which temporarily banned the production of natural gas by methods utilizing high volume hydraulic fracturing, or hydrofracking, of rock sediment.

At the hearing, [counsel] McClaren made a motion for dismissal of the suit on the grounds that, “New York has traditionally given authority to local municipalities to control the land use within their borders through zoning.”

“We don’t believe there is any legal basis for any of the Lenape claims,” he added.

McClaren further noted, “The Court of Appeals has already held that towns and villages can continue to zone in respect to open mines — such as gravel mines. Our position is that the same holds true with respect to oil and gas wells. It’s an issue for the local municipalities to decide if they want them — and, if they do want them, where they want them.”

“It’s not an issue which should be forced upon these municipalities by the state or by the oil and gas industry,” McClaren asserted. [Bold added.]

Well imagine that! McClaren—who is echoing the sentiments expressed by many opponents of fracking across the country—doesn’t like the state government coming in, and telling smaller jurisdictions how they should run their affairs.

Let’s push this to the logical conclusion, shall we? Suppose a local landowner is informed of the potential risks, and still decides that he wants to take a handsome payment in exchange for granting a company permission to develop the natural resources on his property. What business does the local government have, in telling him what he can and can’t do on his own property? Why should this important decision be “forced upon him” by the local municipality?

If the anti-fracking groups were consistent advocates of decentralization of political power, we could take their arguments seriously. In general, they have no problem whatsoever with a higher level of government laying down a one-size-fits-all rule. The next time a carbon tax or cap-and-trade comes up, let’s see if these environmental groups agitate for the right of local municipalities to make their own rules, and not have decisions rammed down their throat from DC.

In the Pipeline: 2/13/13

It can’t be worse than what most University of Colorado students consume on a regular basis. Washington Times (2/12/13) reports: “Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper went to unusually great lengths to learn firsthand the strides the oil and gas industry has made to minimize environmental harm from fracking… The first-term Democrat and former Denver mayor told a Senate committee on Tuesday that he actually drank a glass of fracking fluid produced by oilfield services giant Halliburton… The fluid is made entirely ‘of ingredients sourced from the food industry,’ the company says, making it safe for Mr. Hickenlooper and others to imbibe.”

 

If past is prologue, we’re looking at four more years of this bait and switch. IER (2/13/12) reports: “WASHINGTON D.C. — IER President Thomas Pyle released the following statement in response to President Obama’s State of the Union address, given tonight before a joint session of the United States Congress: ‘Tonight, the president affirmed the renaissance in American manufacturing and recognized the promise of American energy. Yet he seems to misunderstand the reason that manufacturing jobs are coming back to America and why domestic oil and natural gas production are on the rise. These bright spots in an otherwise dark economic time have happened despite the president’s policies, and not because of them… The proof of his administration’s failure is that, despite federal lands and waters much larger than the combined private and state lands in the U.S., the CRS says 96% of this increase in oil production occurred on non federal lands. Something is very, very wrong with the president’s energy programs.’”

 

Great.  Now maybe the reelected brain trust can introduce a bill streamlining the development of actual energy on public lands. U.S. Senate introduces: A BILL…To promote the development of renewable energy on public land, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE. —This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Land Renewable Energy Development Act of 2013’’.

 

Even the WaPo understands that Obama shouldn’t have wasted billions on electric cars. Washington Post (2/11/13) reports: “President Obama repeatedly declared that, with enough federal aid, we can put a million electric vehicles on the road by 2015. His administration has invested about $5 billion in grants, guaranteed loans — including $465 million for Tesla — and tax incentives to buyers… Yet Americans bought just 71,000 plug-in hybrids or all-electric vehicles in the past two years, according to GreenCarReports.com. That’s about a third as many as the Energy Department forecast in a 2011 report that attempted to explain why Obama’s goal was not preposterous.”

In the Pipeline: 2/12/13

Thank you for your service, Mr. Romesha. Washington Free Beacon(2/11/13) reports: “Former Staff Sgt. Clinton Romesha (ROE-muh-shay), 31, will receive the Medal of Honor today for heroic actions during the day-long attack on Combat Outpost Keating in Afghanistan… More than 300 Taliban attacked Keating early in the morning of Oct. 3, 2009, from all four sides and from higher ground. Armed with recoilless rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, mortars, machine guns, and rifles, the Taliban swarmed the site, occupied by only 53 Americans and two Latvians. A score of Afghans stationed there had abandoned the site. Mortars hit Keating every 15 seconds during the first three hours of the attack. Taliban breached the site and destroyed 70 percent of Keating with a fire… He left the Army in 2011 as a staff sergeant and now works in North Dakota where he oversees safety and security procedures for KS Industries, an oil company.”

 

Let’s recap: It’s cool to transport toxic solar panel sludge from California to Rhode Island, but it’s not cool to transport oil through a pipeline like Keystone XL.  Excuse our French, but we’d like to point out that some people are a little two-faced. ABC News (2/10/13) reports: “Homeowners on the hunt for sparkling solar panels are lured by ads filled with images of pristine landscapes and bright sunshine, and words about the technology’s benefits for the environment — and the wallet… What customers may not know is that there’s a dirtier side… While solar is a far less polluting energy source than coal or natural gas, many panel makers are nevertheless grappling with a hazardous waste problem. Fueled partly by billions in government incentives, the industry is creating millions of solar panels each year and, in the process, millions of pounds of polluted sludge and contaminated water.”

 

The Tesla is a technological marvel that rivals some of the greatest transportation innovations like horse-drawn carriages and dog sleighs. NYTimes (2/8/13) reports: “I drove a state-of-the-art electric vehicle past a lot of gas stations. I wasn’t smiling… Instead, I spent nearly an hour at the Milford service plaza as the Tesla sucked electrons from the hitching post. When I continued my drive, the display read 185 miles, well beyond the distance I intended to cover before returning to the station the next morning for a recharge and returning to Manhattan… I drove, slowly, to Stonington, Conn., for dinner and spent the night in Groton, a total distance of 79 miles. When I parked the car, its computer said I had 90 miles of range, twice the 46 miles back to Milford. It was a different story at 8:30 the next morning. The thermometer read 10 degrees and the display showed 25 miles of remaining range — the electrical equivalent of someone having siphoned off more than two-thirds of the fuel that was in the tank when I parked.”

 

Ethanol kills ducks.  Along with engines, gaskets, seals, the environment, and probably humans.  Other than that, it is golden.The Times-Picayune (2/5/13) reports: “Larry Reynolds is a reasoned, respected scientist who isn’t prone to hyperbole, but the state’s waterfowl study leader is also a passionate duck hunter. That’s why he can’t really understand the apathy he’s seen from his fellow waterfowlers as the continent moves headlong into a very preventable duck disaster… The problem stems from the fact that the federal government is mandating ethanol usage in the country, a move begun in the Bush administration that has accelerated under President Obama. As every grocery shopper knows, the use of corn in the production of ethanol has caused a severe spike in grain prices.”

 

Why do the greens hate hydraulic fracturing so much?  Because it opens up vast new energy resources and would give Britain a possible 5.3 trillion cubic feet of shale gas. The Times (2/9/13) reports: “Britain could have enough shale gas to heat every home for 1,500 years, according to new estimates that suggest reserves are 200 times greater than experts previously believed. The British Geological Survey is understood to have increased dramatically its official estimate of the amount of shale gas to between 1,300 trillion and 1,700 trillion cubic feet, dwarfing its previous estimate of 5.3 trillion cubic feet.”

 

We do recognize the consequences of carbon use Ms. Jewell.  One such consequence is the ability to camp out in the wilderness for fun rather than out of necessity. CNSnews.com (2/9/13) reports: “At the University of Denver’s ‘Voice of Experience’ speaker series on October 17th, 2011, Sally Jewell, who Pres. Obama recently nominated for Interior Dept. secretary, said that ‘none of us are paying for the consequences of our carbon use… Government does play a role’ in ensuring that we do pay, and she’d like to see ‘some mechanism is put in place’ to make us recognize carbon consequences, Jewell said.”

In the Pipeline: 2/11/13

If some is good, more is better. Free Beacon (2/8/13) reports: “Interior secretary nominee Sally Jewell previously served on the board of an environmental group that has filed dozens of lawsuits against the federal government, including against the Department of Interior. Jewell, who was nominated by President Barack Obama Wednesday, joined the board of the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA) in 2004 and currently serves as one of the group’s vice-chairs.”

 

If China is beating us at the clean energy race, as His Majesty claims, then why is their air getting dirtier while our air quality continues to improve? Heritage Foundation (2/8/13) reports:  “A cloud of photochemical smog from China drifted into Japan this week. The story highlights the fact that air pollution in China is getting worse—despite lamentations that the “world is passing us by” in clean energy. That quote came from Steven Chu, President Obama’s then-Secretary of Energy, in 2009. Chu tendered his resignation last Friday in a letter suggesting that those who disagreed with him were living in the ‘Stone Age.’”

 

Don’t worry, this private airport proposal is also part of Google’s overall green initiative because buried in the details is the fact that the new buildings will be Gold LEED certified. CBS San Francisco(2/7/13) reports: “San Jose should accept an offer by a major airport operator to build an $82 million private airport for executives of Google Inc. at Mineta San Jose International Airport, a city official said. Signature Aviation, a British firm, wants to construct an executive terminal, hangars and ramp space “accommodating the largest business jets” for Mountain View-based Google at the San Jose airport, William Sherry, the city’s director of aviation, wrote in a memo.”

 

Whether it’s too cold or too hot, too wet or too dry, climate change is behind it all. Think Progress (2/8/13) reports: “Like a baseball player on steroids, our climate system is breaking records at an unnatural pace. And like a baseball player on steroids, it’s the wrong question to ask whether a given home run is “caused” by steroids. As Trenberth wrote in his must-read analaysis, “How To Relate Climate Extremes to Climate Change,” the “answer to the oft-asked question of whether an event is caused by climate change is that it is the wrong question. All weather events are affected by climate change because the environment in which they occur is warmer and moister than it used to be.'”

 

ICYMI, IER dropped a bombshell last week. IER reports: “While headlines have reported a boom in US oil and gas production, that boom has been related exclusively to exploration and development on private and state lands and waters. Even that limited expansion has had profound effects. Opening up Federal resources — in addition to private and state resources — to exploration and development can accelerate all of those trends. But recent administrations have yet to follow through on promises to allow access to Federal resources, instead proposing to levy increased taxes on oil and gas production.”

In the Pipeline: 2/8/13

Carbon tax?  Roadless rule?  Closing off access?  Time to stop shopping at REI and time to stop this nominee. Wall Street Journal (2/7/13) “In naming Sally Jewell as Interior secretary, President Obama lauded the REI boss as a woman who “knows the link between conservation and good jobs.” Tell that to Kevin Lunny. Mr. Lunny runs an 80-year-old California oyster business that had the bad luck decades ago of being enclosed in a federal park. On Monday, as Ms. Jewell polished her acceptance speech, a federal judge ordered the business evicted. Among the organizations working hardest to destroy the livelihood of Mr. Lunny and his 30 workers was the National Parks Conservation Association. Ms. Jewell is vice-chairman of its board.”

 Do NOT touch the Royal Lands

 

Sally, Sarah whatever. This gal will pick up right where Lisa Jackson/Richard Windsor left off in the most transparent Administration in history. PoliticoPro (2/8/13) “Sally Jewell, the newly nominated Interior Secretary nominee, gave $10,000 to President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012 as part of long history of donating to political campaigns and causes, Federal Election Commission records show…Those contributions are listed under her rarely used actual name, Sarah Jewell. The White House declined to comment. Your morning host runs down Jewell’s history of political contributions, which total nearly $100,000.”

 

How much of that public outcry came from the People’s Republic of Boulder? New York Times (2/6/13) “After facing a public outcry over plans to lease thousands of acres of public lands in Colorado’s North Fork Valley for oil and gas drilling, federal officials announced Wednesday that they would not put the parcels up for bid at auction this month.”

 

OK, this has nothing to do with energy, but we couldn’t resist. Daily Caller (2/8/13) “The back-and-forth verbal jabs between former Bush White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove, his deputies at American Crossroads and some of the conservative movement’s so-called “critically important figures” took another intense turn on Mark Levin’s radio show on Thursday, with Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King entering the fray.”

 

We knew who he was in bed with all along… The Onion (2/7/13) “Sources have reported that following a long night of carousing at a series of D.C. watering holes, Energy Secretary Steven Chu awoke Thursday morning to find himself sleeping next to a giant solar panel he had met the previous evening.”

 

The following think tank chiefs are opposed to a carbon tax.  The list to date follows.  If your guy is not on the list, it is because he either favors a carbon tax, wants to retain the option of favoring a carbon tax at some point in the future, or has yet to contact us.

 
Tom Pyle, American Energy Alliance / Institute for Energy Research
Myron Ebell, Freedom Action
Phil Kerpen, American Commitment
William O’Keefe, George C. Marshall Institute
Lawson Bader, Competitive Enterprise Institute
Andrew Quinlan, Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Tim Phillips, Americans for Prosperity
Joe Bast, Heartland Institute
David Ridenour, National Center for Public Policy Research
Michael Needham, Heritage Action for America
Tom Schatz, Citizens Against Government Waste
Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform
Sabrina Schaeffer, Independent Women’s Forum
Barrett E. Kidner, Caesar Rodney Institute
George Landrith, Frontiers of Freedom
Thomas A. Schatz, Citizens Against Government Waste
Bill Wilson, Americans for Limited Government

In the Pipeline: 2/5/13

It’s good to get out the whetstone and sharpen the sword.  And while the fight is never won or lost on the study field, this is where we like to begin the battle. IER (2/5/13) reports: “This paper illustrates that Congress has chosen to evaluate only one small piece of the economic effect of opening federal tracts to oil and gas leasing. By ignoring the investment phase, the CBO — upon the instruction of Congress — substantially underestimates the economic effects of current policy choices. Moreover, by focusing on lease revenue and ignoring the potential for increased tax revenue, Congress has doubly downplayed the fiscal effects of such a policy. By failing yet again to analyze jobs, wages, and output, Congress ignores the crucial economic reality that freeing resources can help our economy grow beyond the recent recession and its continuing drag upon economic growth.”

 

There always has been something about that girl Mary in Florida… IER (2/4/13) reports: “IER Distinguished Senior Fellow and former acting EIA administrator Mary Hutzler will testify on Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 10:00AM before the House Subcommittee on Energy and Power. The hearing will focus on “American Energy Security and Innovation: An Assessment of North America’s Energy Resources”. Hutzler’s testimony will evaluate North America’s vast energy resources and assail the federal energy policies that continue to deny access to those resources and stifle economic growth and job creation. Highlights from the testimony include:”

 

In other news, water remains wet. Reuters (2/4/13) reports: “Are electric cars running out of juice again? Recent moves by Japan’s two largest automakers suggest that the electric car, after more than 100 years of development and several brief revivals, still is not ready for prime time – and may never be… In the meantime, the attention of automotive executives in Asia, Europe and North America is beginning to swing toward an unusual but promising new alternate power source: hydrogen.”

 

The Obama administration’s entire economic plan exposed – “Study: Global Warming Can Be Slowed By Working Less”. U.S. News (2/4/13) reports: “Want to reduce the effects of global warming? Stop working so hard. Working fewer hours might help slow global warming, according to a new study released Monday by the Center for Economic Policy and Research.”

 

Richard Windsor would have spent more time in rural America?  One thing the next EPA chief should keep in mind about rural America: people there use their real names to do business. Reuters (2/4/13) reports: “Jackson’s deepest regret, she said, is that she failed to reach out to rural, often conservative regions of the United States. As a result, she said, opponents were able to generate politically damaging rumors of looming regulatory crackdowns, such as a fictitious EPA plan to treat bovine excretions as dangerous pollutants.”

 

Apparently Lisa Jacobson – relation to Richard Windsor unknown – thinks there are no drags on the economy.  I guess in our new European state, we’re chugging right along if we hit 1% growth. E&ENews (2/4/13) reports: “By the end of 2012, CO2 emissions had declined 10.7 percent compared with 2005 levels. The drop brings the United States more than halfway toward President Obama’s 17 percent emissions cut target for the next decade… The findings challenged the conservative argument that acting on climate change would be a drag on the economy, said Lisa Jacobson, president of the Business Council for Sustainable Energy. Instead, carbon emissions declined even as gross domestic product was going up, she added.”

 

Is anyone left over there?  Is there no future in trying to cannibalize your colleagues? Washington Guardian (2/4/13) reports: “America’s Natural Gas Alliance said President and CEO Regina Hopper will leave the interest group at the end of February, and a search is to be conducted for a successor.”

Even With PTC, America’s Largest Wind Company Forecasts ‘A Down Year’ in 2013

 

During the debate to retain the wind Production Tax Credit (PTC) last year, wind advocates offered a variety of spurious claims in an intense lobbying effort to keep the favorable tax treatment. In one case, the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) warned that new wind installations would decline precipitously if Congress allowed the PTC to lapse.

If this argument is correct, it would stand to reason that the one-year extension and expansion of the PTC included in the fiscal cliff deal would mean 2013 will be at least as good a year as 2012 for wind construction, yet already wind developers are trying to lower expectations.

NextEra Energy, the country’s largest wind developer, forecasted a weak year for wind construction even after securing the PTC extension. At the company’s earnings call on Tuesday, NextEra CFO Moray Dewhurst said, “2013 will be a down year for new wind compared to 2012, as it will take time for the wind supply chain to gear up.” According to the AWEA fact sheet cited above, extending the PTC was essential for wind “to be part of America’s energy mix.” But even with the PTC, it appears wind will face sluggish growth this year.

The federal government has supported the wind industry for more than three decades, yet wind developers, according to their own studies, still rely on the PTC to maintain current growth in wind capacity. When can we expect wind power to demonstrate its viability in the marketplace without government handouts? If we take NextEra at its word, 2013 is out of the question.

In the Pipeline: 2/4/13

A government owned stadium, powered by a heavily regulated electricity infrastructure, all pushed hurriedly towards unreliable, taxpayer funded green energy? What could go wrong? DOE (2/3/13) reports: “To make this the greenest Super Bowl, the New Orleans Host Committee has partnered with fans and the community to offset energy use across the major Super Bowl venues. The exterior of the Mercedes-Benz Superdome features more than 26,000 LED lights on 96 full-color graphic display panels, designed to wash the building in a spectrum of animated colors, patterns and images. The system draws only 10 kilowatts of electricity — equivalent to the amount of energy used by a small home — and the lights are expected to last for many years before needing replacement.”

 

I wonder if Secretary Kerry is going to set an example by selling his yacht. Or maybe one of his homes.  Or one of his dozen or so cars. Politico (2/3/13) reports: Who will help President Barack Obama meet his ambitious promises to tackle climate change? Eco-celebrities and tree-climbing protesters need not apply. This is a job for wonks… The president’s top climate appointees and the outside advisers best positioned to shape his agenda are a team replete with heavy hitters — including green-minded business leaders, buttoned-down environmental lobbyists and bureaucrats who have spent years wrestling with the minutiae of regulations.

 

And yet, miraculously unencumbered by a sense of their own hypocrisy, Mr. Pallone and Mr. Lautenberg allowed themselves to be driven to work this morning.  In cars.  That run on gasoline. FuelFix(1/31/13) reports: “Northeast lawmakers are asking the Obama administration to abandon a plan to allow energy companies to conduct seismic research to identify hidden pockets of potential oil and gas along the Atlantic Coast… Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., and Sen. Frank Lautenberg, both Democrats from New Jersey, sent letters to President Barack Obama highlighting their concerns with an Interior Department plan to allow a new generation of seismic studies along the East Coast, from Delaware to Florida. The last round of similar research was conducted in the region more than three decades ago.”

 

What?  Is this guy trying to say that the President is dropping – without fanfare – his big idea for cars and fuels?  Remember this when the bad guys circle back around for a low carbon fuel standard that will rely on . . . electric vehicles. The Truth About Cars (1/31/13) reports: “Under a new strategy announced today, the Department of Energy promised to support research into new battery technologies and manufacturing methods that would lower the cost of lightweight materials and improve vehicles’ fuel-efficiency, Reuters reports… But the DOE backpedales furiously from a goal set out in a 2011 State of the Union speech, where President Barack Obama announced what he called ‘Apollo projects of our times.’ One of them was the goal for the United States to be ‘the first country to have a million electric vehicles on the road by 2015.’”

 

Was it Warren Or Jimmy Who Sang, “Yes, I am a pirate two hundred years too late.” The answer probably can be found on the White House visitor list. Calgary Herald (2/2/13) reports: “When famed American investor Warren Buffett began to invest in rail car-making companies and railways a few years back, it should have been a sign to the rest of us to jump on board. Apparently, Buffet figured out that as it gets ever more difficult for pipelines to get approved and built, the light at the end of the oil bottleneck is a train — and that’s a good thing.”

 

Lead the way, Arnold. The Raw Story (1/31/13) reports: “If we want to inspire the world, it is time for us to forget about the old way of talking about climate change, where we crush people, where we overwhelm people with data,” the former California governor, bodybuilder and film star said… “There is a new way, a more sexy, a more hip way. Instead of using doom and gloom and telling people what they can’t do, we should make them part of our movement and tell them what they can do,” he said.

 

Why are oil imports falling?

 

A recent article in the Washington Post proclaims that U.S. oil imports are falling to their lowest level since 1987. The decrease in imports is a combination of two things, Americans using less oil because of an economic downturn and increased domestic production. The increase in domestic production can be attributed to the increased usage of hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) and directional drilling to unlock oil from the many, vast shale formations the United States is blessed with.

Increasing domestic production begins to put to bed the notion that our nation does not have much oil. In fact, we have tons of oil. Our vast reserves and increased production have led the International Energy Agency (IEA) to predict the United States to overtake Saudi Arabia and Russia as the world’s largest oil producer by 2017.

Every American should welcome this prediction of the U.S. leading the world in oil production with open arms. The oil industry is responsible for many high-paying jobs and supports many other indirect jobs that our country could certainly use right now.

The main thing threatening this prediction from happening is the federal government. The increase in oil production has been mainly on state and private lands because of the arduous permitting and regulation on federal lands. It takes roughly 300 days to receive a permit to drill on federal lands, but can take as little as 10 in some states. The old saying “time is money” is incredibly appropriate to understand why oil companies are staying away from federal lands.

At the beginning of President Obama’s second term, it will be interesting to see if any progress is made to open up more federal lands to oil and gas development which will provide high-paying jobs, more affordable and reliable energy, and ultimately more energy security. With many predictions American energy independence, will President Obama and the federal government make it a priority to achieve energy independence or will we see more regulatory hurdles impeding development of our natural resources? Only time will give us the answer, let’s hope Mr. President picks the right one.

In the Pipeline: 2/1/13

We needed to let this ripen for a day.  Its awesomeness originally overwhelmed us. Forbes (1/30/13) reports: “The EPA’s Lisa Jackson: The Worst Head of the Worst Regulatory Agency, Ever… President Obama and his minions seem to think that freedom is a four-letter word.  His administration has imposed an array of intrusive, nanny-state, financial, environmental and consumer-product regulations that will cost Americans hundreds of billions of dollars.”

 

The good news is that this keeps her from “singing”. MasterResource (1/30/13) reports: “It was an utterly bizarre day, as might be expected when the star of the event is the woman who made “bed-ins” famous, supposedly broke up the Beatles, and has launched a crazy clothing line conceivable only by someone with $500 million of inherited wealth to throw around. (Also of note: these two Beatles beneficiaries live in the famous Dakota building in Manhattan, which is heated by three new natural gas boilers. Apparently, the product is only snake-like if you develop it, not if you consume it – an interesting paradox to be sure.)…It was like that all day.”

 

Next up: curfew!  Because how else will they deal with dark street corners and rising crime rates? The Guardian (1/30/13) reports: “Shops and offices throughout France will be forced to turn off their lights overnight in a bid to fight light pollution, the country’s environment ministry has announced… Under the new law, which comes into effect on 1 July, lights in shop window displays will be turned off at 1am. Interior lights in offices and other non-residential buildings will have to be switched off an hour after the last employee leaves. Local councils will be able to make exceptions for Christmas and other special occasions, and in certain tourist or cultural areas.”

 

In case anyone’s forgetting, your morning routine typically doesn’t involve chopping wood to start a fire, boil water, and make coffee. Free Enterprise (1/28/13) reports: “EPA Turns Lights Off on Texas Power Plant Project.”

 

 

When will FWS list the beleaguered lice? Bloomberg (1/14/13) reports: “Pubic lice, the crab-shaped insects that have dwelled in human groins since the beginning of history, are disappearing. Doctors say bikini waxing may be the reason… Waning infestations of the bloodsuckers have been linked by doctors to pubic depilation, especially a technique popularized in the 1990s by a Manhattan salon run by seven Brazilian sisters. More than 80 percent of college students in the U.S. remove all or some of their pubic hair — part of a trend that’s increasing in western countries.”

The following think tank chiefs are opposed to a carbon tax.  The list to date follows.  If your guy is not on the list, it is because he either favors a carbon tax, wants to retain the option of favoring a carbon tax at some point in the future, or has yet to contact us.

Tom Pyle, American Energy Alliance / Institute for Energy Research
Myron Ebell, Freedom Action
Phil Kerpen, American Commitment
William O’Keefe, George C. Marshall Institute
Lawson Bader, Competitive Enterprise Institute
Andrew Quinlan, Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Tim Phillips, Americans for Prosperity
Joe Bast, Heartland Institute
David Ridenour, National Center for Public Policy Research
Michael Needham, Heritage Action for America
Tom Schatz, Citizens Against Government Waste
Grover Norquist, Americans for Tax Reform
Sabrina Schaeffer, Independent Women’s Forum
Barrett E. Kidner, Caesar Rodney Institute
George Landrith, Frontiers of Freedom