In the Pipeline: 10/22/12

You know, this isn’t really a story of overreach, misjudgment and disappointment.  It is a story about stupidity, corruption, and the nascent fascism of an ever-larger government.  Oh, it is also a story about complacent and lazy media elites failing to do their jobs. NYTimes (10/18/12) reports: “The period around 2003 was the golden spring of green technology. John McCain and Joe Lieberman introduced a bipartisan bill to curb global warming. I got my first ride in a Prius from a conservative foreign policy hawk who said that these new technologies were going to help us end our dependence on Middle Eastern despots. You’d go to Silicon Valley and all the venture capitalists, it seemed, were rushing into clean tech… From that date on the story begins to get a little sadder.”

 

Speaking of which, we wonder if David Brooks is ‘sad’ that his tax dollars are paying for people to play cards at a federally funded electric car battery plant.  Must be a hard swallow to realize the ‘golden spring of green technology’ has just been a poker game all along, and the government stacked the deck against the American people. Washington Examiner (10/19/12) reports: “Workers at a Michigan electric car battery making firm that got millions of federal economic recovery funds have so little to do that they sit around playing cards, watching movies and reading magazines according to a local television news report.”

 

EPA says that the new automobile mandates will raise the average price of a car by 3200 dollars.  That it will price 6 to 7 million people out of the new car market.  That to realize any economic advantage at all, the price of gasoline will have to be $6.00 per gallon for the life of the car.  The National Academy of Sciences has said that the last round of mandates resulted in as many as 2500 deaths a year.  Other than that, we think this is a great idea. NYTimes (10/20/12) reports: “Yes, the costs for cars with higher miles per gallon will rise a touch, but the savings will be manyfold that amount. The Environmental Protection Agency projects families will save $1.8 trillion in fuel costs and reduce oil consumption by 2.1 million barrels per day by 2025, which is equivalent to one-half of the oil that we currently import from OPEC countries every day.”

 

The reason why people hate Washington?  Because it is jammed with hypocrites. Cryptome (11/12/08) reports: “Friedman explains his own ecological circumstances – geothermal heating, solar panels – he invites readers…to regard his real-estate move as an act of rescue…which could sound like someone buying a lot of champagne to protect society from cork-related injuries.”

 

Fred Siegel is right.  But George McGovern was still a great American (35 combat missions in WWII). ArgusLeader.com (10/21/12) reports: “To critics, McGovern’s rise helped polarize the nation’s political institutions. His ascendancy in 1972 expressed the polarization that emerged in the 1960s over Vietnam, race riots and the civil rights movement, said Fred Siegel, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a conservative think tank, and a scholar on American liberalism.”

You Can Thank a Coal Miner

FACT CHECK: IER Examines Obama/Romney Energy Claims

During the town hall presidential debate in Hempstead, New York on Oct. 16, 2012, Governor Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama squared off on many issues, and energy policy was one of the most contentious of the evening. Energy policy deserves a comprehensive, fact-based national conversation. The Institue for Energy Research (IER} has analyzed the responses of both candidates and has fact checked their statements during last night’s debate.
  • Gas prices have doubled under the Obama administration, in part because costly EPA regulations have forced refineries to close and more closures are likely.
  • Total federal oil production (both onshore and offshore) declined by 13 percent between FY2010 and FY2011, while oil production on non-federal lands increased 11 percent.
  • Natural gas production fell by 16 percent between FY2008 and 2011, despite the fact that natural gas production is the highest it has been since 1949.
  • Coal production dropped 6.5 percent between 2008 and 2011. For the first 8 months of this year, coal production is almost 5 percent lower than the first 8 months of last year.
  • Job losses associated with the closure of EPA-targeted coal units could amount to more than 50,000 direct jobs and more than 250,000 indirect jobs.
  • The Obama administration’s increased fuel efficiency standards are estimated to increase the average cost of a vehicle by $3,000 and cut 7 million car buyers out of the new vehicle market.

To read the full document, click here.

###

In the Pipeline: 10/19/12

Coal: It’s what’s for dinner. AEA (10/19/12) reports: “The American Energy Alliance traveled to West Virginia with the “American Products. American Power.” bus tour and met with the hardworking coal miners that keep the lights on for the rest of America. Bill Raney, President of the West Virginia Coal Association, describes in this video just how important coal is for our daily lives.”

 

 

More movie fun for a Friday morning . This time, petrochemicals are for dinner. 

 

The product and power of our lives

 


Does anyone know what déjà vu
 means? Heritage (10/18/12) reports: “A solar company that got a multi-million-dollar grant from the Department of Energy earlier this year announced Wednesday that it will file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, making it the second taxpayer-backed green energy company to file for bankruptcy this week. “

 

Earlier in the week, Scott was warning about an energy tax.  Now, he offers a couple of arguments against it.  Next, he will send both the article and his editorial around to his customers.  This town can make one cynical. Atlanta Journal-Constitution (10/18/12) reports: “Third, carbon taxes aren’t fair; in fact, they are regressive. Those living at or near the poverty level, or on fixed incomes, tend to pay the largest share of their monthly incomes for energy. Therefore, an energy tax — which a carbon tax most certainly is — makes those in society least able to afford it pay the most. While some argue that a portion of the carbon tax could be rebated to offset this impact, don’t bet on it. Conservatives who allegedly support carbon taxes insist on revenue neutrality, meaning cutting corporate rates to offset the revenue raised by the carbon tax. That means no money for rebates. Or for deficit reduction, for that matter.”

 

AEI keeps talking about that carbon tax like it is going to be part of some great big regulatory deal.  They are wrong. E&ENews (10/18/12) reports: “He does, however, also have some baggage that could prove problematic in the confirmation process, particularly in satisfying the GOP’s conservative tea party wing… For example, Connaughton has defended his work to address climate change while at CEQ, which included efforts to facilitate the transfer of low-carbon technology between countries… Green noted that Connaughton and his team were criticized by some conservatives for “being willing to go along with heavier-handed regulation than they had to.”

 

What can you say?  The Republic is probably finished. Washington Times (10/17/12) reports: “Just outside San Antonio, at the intersection of Look 1604 and Highway 151, the discovery of a single, dime-sized, translucent, subterranean spider has brought a $15 million traffic reduction project to a dead stop. Unfortunately for area motorists, the Bracken Cave meshweaver is one of more than 1,400 species regulated under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).”

 

Heads of think tanks* who are publically opposed to a carbon tax: 

Tom Pyle, American Energy Alliance / Institute for Energy Research
Myron Ebell, Freedom Action
Phil Kerpen, American Committment
Fred Smith, Competitive Enterprise Institute
Andrew Quinlan, Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Tim Phillips, Americans for Prosperity
Joe Bast, Heartland Institute
David Ridenour, National Center for Public Policy Research
Michael Needham, Heritage Action for America

*For now, we’re keeping it simple and focusing on heads of think tanks with this list. If you’d like to join the list or you think you might know someone who would, please contact [email protected].

All They Want for Christmas is Coal

 

On October 13th, the American Products. American Power. bus tour joined forces with United for Coal, a grassroots organization that sprung up in response to the Obama administration’s war on coal.  Allen Gibson, the founder of United for Coal, is a retired coal miner fighting for the very survival of small towns throughout Appalachia.

The war on coal is destroying small communities that are dependent on the coal industry, particularly in Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky.  The trucking, railroad, and restaurant industries all rely on coal.  Coal is a way of life for these small town, and locals take great pride in the fact that their fathers and grandfathers before them worked in the mines to put food on the table and to fuel economic growth throughout the nation with affordable energy.

Sadly, coal counties in Appalachia and across the country are reeling in pain as a result of the current administration’s war on affordable energy.  Families are anxious about not being able to afford Christmas presents this year, not to mention being able to put food on the table.  Nonetheless, the bonds that run through coal communities are strong, and United for Coal is providing hope and a rallying cry to fight back against the war on coal.

On October 13th, thousands of pro-coal supporters stood hand in hand along a sixty-mile stretch of Route 23 between Virginia and Kentucky to show support for coal mining.  Founder Allan Gibson said their message for Washington is simply: “Let us work. Let us do our jobs – what we enjoy doing. We’re not made to work in the mines, these aren’t labor camps – it’s what we want to do. Either get behind us, or get out of the way.”

The Miller family was joined by thousands of supports on October 13th to stand United for Coal

The support for coal and coal mining on display Saturday was overwhelming, emotional, and full of hope.  Tracy Miller, the wife of a coal miner and an organizer for the Virginian chapter for United for Coal, is currently trying to raise money for families who will have unemployed mothers and fathers this Christmas.  So far, they have raised $1,500 for the cause, but with so many families struggling in the wake of recent and future layoffs, the outlook for the winter is bleak.  “Four years ago we had savings – we were saving for our children’s futures; today our family is doing everything it can to keep the lights on in our home and I know that many more families are having the same difficulties,” Tracy said. “Without coal in Southwest Virginia we will lose everything my husband has worked so hard for.”

The communities that stood United for Coal on Saturday are not asking for government handouts or special privileges. They’re not even asking to roll back the existing regulations on coal.  Their wish for Christmas this year is simple: stop the war on coal and stop burdening the industry with standards that are impossible to meet.  This abundant, affordable resource has powered America and built communities for generations; now more than ever, America needs to return to the fundamental building blocks that drive true economic growth.

Click here to sign the petition for more domestic energy production and to fight back against unnecessary government regulations. 

To keep up with the bus tour, visit engage.productsandpower.org

New Chemical Plant = 15,000 Jobs

Building a new energy manufacturing and chemical plant in Western Pennsylvania would provide the area with thousands of construction jobs and hundreds of permanent jobs, not to mention the investments that would be made in upgrading and building new infrastructure. We met Jeff Heasley in Apollo, PA at the Fort Hand Festival, and he is hopeful that the plant is built and breathes life into the local economy.

“Stop Obama’s War” Radio Spots Begin in Ohio, Virginia

WASHINGTON D.C. — The American Energy Alliance (AEA) began airing today two radio spots in Ohio and Virginia to expose President Obama’s ‘war on coal’ and to encourage residents to “vote no” on the administration’s war against American energy and jobs. The ads will run more than 8600 times between Oct. 17 and Nov. 6.  Additionally, AEA has placed online banner advertisements with CNN.com, FOXNews.com, DrudgeReport.com, RealClearPolitics.com, and the websites of various Ohio and Virginia news organizations.

“The president and his Washington cronies have declared war on affordable energy and American jobs,” the ad states. “And to make matters worse, in a time when jobs are few and wages are falling, Obama and his EPA are eliminating good jobs in Ohio/Virginia.”

“The cost of energy is increasing. Jobs are being cut. We simply cannot afford four more years of destructive energy policies. Washington needs to stop making it harder for Ohio/Virginia families. Vote NO on President Obama’s war against American energy and jobs.”

Last week, AEA announced a 30-second television ad which is currently running in both Ohio and Virginia markets.

To listen to the Ohio “Stop Obama’s War” radio advertisement, click here.
To listen to the Virginia “Stop Obama’s War” radio advertisement, click here.

To read the Ohio ad fact sheet, click here.
To read the Virginia ad fact sheet, click here.

###

In the Pipeline: 10/17/12

This video makes us laugh.  Until we remember that we are paying for this mess. Michigan Capitol Confidential (10/8/12) reports: “In the video, Gov. Granholm’s press conference on A123 Systems was interrupted by a phone call… It was President Obama on the line to remind the audience that it was his American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that enabled A123 Systems to be the “first American factory to start high-volume production of advanced vehicle batteries.””

 

 

There are a lot of good reasons to wake up from this nightmare. For starters, no one is interested in investing anything except taxpayer dollars in wind.  Grist (10/17/12) reports: “Since 2007, Susman’s OwnEnergy, which installs wind turbines, has grown to be one of the nation’s most prominent wind installers. But he’s plagued by a recurring nightmare: “Every few years the industry has to drop everything for six or nine months and focus exclusively on having the credit passed.””

 

I think Scott and Jeff are trying to drum up some business.  Although I am not sure a $20 a ton tax would not be noticed by industry.  It would, after all, become the third largest tax in the United States at that point. Politico (10/16/12) reports: “Two key energy industry advisers say a carbon tax will likely become an attractive revenue-boosting option for Congress, no matter who lands in the White House next year… A carbon tax likely won’t achieve lift-off in the next year, but it does remain a possibility that everyone — especially investors — should keep a close eye on, Bracewell & Giuliani’s Scott Segal and Jeff Holmstead said on a conference call Tuesday.”

 

Again, government does not pick winners and losers; it only picks losers. Politico (10/16/12) reports: ““It’s sad so many people keep losing jobs that are based on politicians cutting ribbons instead of businesses built on real market demand,” Dan Kish of the Institute for Energy Research wrote to POLITICO. “The government couldn’t even get the math right” on A123 Systems.”

 

Of course they talked about the production of affordable, reliable domestic energy instead of global warming.  Almost no voters care about global warming, and almost every voter cares about energy. Think Progress (10/17/12) reports: “Those concerned about climate change were sorely disappointed during Tuesday night’s town hall-style debate when both the candidates and the moderator — CNN’s Candy Crowley — failed to address the issue of climate change, even during a lengthy and heated exchange about energy issues.”

In the Pipeline: 10/16/12

Why we fight. 

 

How in the world did this run in the Washington Post? Washington Post(10/15/12) reports: “Al Gore is about 50 times richer than he was when he left the vice presidency in 2001. According to an Oct. 11 report by The Post’s Carol D. Leonnig, Gore accumulated a Romneyesque $100 million partly through investing in alternative-energy firms subsidized by the Obama administration.”

 

When the Bloomberg crowd starts running things like this, you have to think they are beginning to hedge their bets, just in case the blessed one loses. Bloomberg (10/11/12) reports: “In 2008 candidate Barack Obama promised to create 5 million green jobs. He laid out a plan to invest $150 billion over 10 years that would advance a clean-energy economy built around biofuels, hybrid cars, low-emission coal plants, and renewable sources such as solar and wind. How many has he actually created? … Digging into the public records of the $21 billion spent so far through 19 U.S. Department of Energy programs reveals 3,960 projects that employ 28,854 people.”

 

I am amazed that a federal government program, especially one as well-designed and run as the 30% tax credit for expensive and unreliable energy, is subject to corruption. Renewable Energy World (10/15/12) reports: “A new government investigation of SolarCity on the eve of its initial public offering (IPO) may explain how solar leasing is fleecing federal taxpayers and making U.S. residential solar more expensive than in other countries.”

 

Even at the State level, government does not pick winners and losers.  It just picks losers, mostly because winners don’t go to the government for funding.  Losers on the other hand, understand that their only hope is the corrupt and irrational government approach.ToledoBlade.com (10/14/12) reports: “Four of the 10 companies or projects funded under the advanced energy program have failed to repay the state on time, submit financial reports by designated deadlines, or adhere to stipulations of state loan agreements, a Blade investigation found. Some of them face a combination of these problems. Four of the 16 projects initially approved by the state aren’t moving forward.”

 

For those of us already losing sleep over Obama’s energy policy, this is not a good thing. Berwickshire News (10/11/12) reports: “An honorary consultant in sleep medicine, Dr C D Hanning, is warning of the “unacceptable levels of sleep disturbance” for people living within 1.5km of wind turbines.”

 

If some is good, more is better. ABC News (10/15/12) reports: “There were cheers around Germany when Chancellor Angela Merkel announced last year, in the wake of the Fukushima disaster in Japan, a swift end to nuclear power in favor of renewable energy sources like wind and solar… But only 18 months into the plan, the cost of the switchover is beginning to sink in. Some politicians, fearful of losing popular support for the transition, are demanding an overhaul of the way it is financed… The country’s four main grid operators said Monday that households will from January see a nearly 50 percent rise in the tax they pay to finance the switchover – from €3.6 cents to €5.3 cents ($6.7 cents) per kilowatt hour. A typical family of four will pay about €250 ($324) per year under the tariff, including a sales tax.”

In the Pipeline: 10/15/12

Promise made. Promise kept. Watch our latest ad:

War on Affordable Energy Ad

 

Here is the deal.  It turns out you can’t get rid of an affordable, reliable energy source (like nuclear), and rely on an expensive, unreliable source (like solar and wind), without increase the cost to ratepayers (like me and you). Renewable Energy World (10/12/12) reports: “German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to cap taxpayer subsidies for renewable energy is aimed at limiting the political fallout among voters from a surge in electricity bills due next week.”

 

Remember this when some idiot economist starts blathering about taxing “bads”.  An energy tax is just that – a tax on energy; it will have zero effect on global warming. Daily Mail (10/13/12) reports: “The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago, according to new data released last week… The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.”

 

Here’s the problem.  Guys like Joe Manchin (who had nothing to do with killing cap and trade), Sherrod Brown, and Joe Donnelly talk a lot about how they favor coal.  But the reality is that they vote for Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, and they do (and have done) nothing to slow down the Administration’s ruthless march towards eliminating affordable, reliable energy.  They are all like Rick Boucher and will all wind up like Rick Boucher eventually. AP (10/12/12) reports: “Obama’s moves on clean air and fossil fuels have complicated the lives of Democrats in coal-rich states that count on mining for jobs and economic growth, with incumbents and candidates adopting drastically different strategies to ensure their own political survival.”

 

Maybe this explains why sales of electric cars are so terrible. WSJ (10/10/12) reports: “Electric vehicles can help reduce harmful greenhouse emissions, but a new study suggests that, without cleaner sources of electricity, the environmental benefits would be limited.”

 

Hang on, Donna, the Utica is coming on line. NYTimes (10/13/12) reports: “She tries to lower expenses. When her vexing electric bill shot up a while back, she sold off several appliances and bought a cheaper, more energy-efficient freezer. She spent Mother’s Day shopping for wholesale bargains on eggs and dish soap. She bounces from Rural King to Sam’s Club to Giant Eagle, looking for the cheapest coffee.”

 

Why we fight. National Journal (10/11/12) reports: “Seventeen-year-old Contessa Skelton learned that her mother had lost her job—for the second time in two years—as they stood in the parking lot outside her dentist’s office.”