AEA praises defeat of Stabenow, Menendez-Burr Amendments

For Immediate Release
March 13, 2012

WASHINGTON D.C. — The United States Senate defeated on a bipartisan 49-49 vote an amendment to the transportation bill on Tuesday that would have reinstated the production tax credit (PTC), a scheme to provide billions of dollars in taxpayer-funded handouts to providers of unreliable and intermittent wind energy. Similarly, the Senate defeated the Menendez-Burr Amendment to create subsidies for natural gas vehicles.

The American Energy Alliance was joined by numerous free market organizations and other concerned government watchdog groups to oppose the amendments offered by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), Sen Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), and Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.).

“The defeat of the Stabenow Amendment and the Menendez-Burr Amendment is a victory for U.S. taxpayers and free markets that are hurt by government intervention in the energy sector. For more than 100 years, wind has been used to generate electricity, and it has yet to provide reliable, affordable energy for American consumers,” noted President Thomas J. Pyle after the vote.

“The Obama administration has been working overtime to create a market for wind and solar energy, using taxpayer money to bankroll now-defunct renewable companies like Solyndra to the tune of $535 million and more. As for subsidies to natural gas vehicles, the market is already responding to historic price declines due to record production on private and state lands. There is no need for the federal government to tinker with the market, which only invites more wasteful spending and greater fraud.

“Today’s votes send a clear signal that the American public has tired of the Administration’s interventionist schemes, which have already cost hundreds of billions of dollars and done nothing to reduce the cost of skyrocketing electricity and gasoline prices.”

###

AEA to Congress: Oppose Gov’t Intervention in Energy Markets

For Immediate Release
March 8, 2012

WASHINGTON D.C. — The American Energy Alliance sent two coalition letters to all United States Senators today opposing amendments to the Senate transportation bill that would create new taxpayer-funded subsidies for natural gas vehicles, extend the production tax credit (PTC) to underwrite wind energy, and revive the 1603 Treasury grant program that gives taxpayer money for the installation of solar panels and other renewable technologies.

“The scheme is little different from the federal government’s loan to Solyndra. Banks are willing to loan money to people that present little risk, but Solyndra and natural gas fueling infrastructure obviously present enough of a risk to need a government subsidy,” reads one letter.

“There is no need for Congress to intervene to try to pick winners and loser in the natural gas market — the market is already responding to lower natural gas prices in an efficient and cost-effective way.”

In calling for the defeat of amendments to extend the production tax credit and other renewable energy hand-outs, AEA President Thomas Pyle denounced “the intervention of politicians and bureaucrats in the energy sector,” which has “had devastating economic consequences and led to embarrassing scandals.”

“We urge you to stop digging this hole any deeper, and to spare the consumers and businesses the terrible pain that will surely eventually accrue because of uneconomic sources of energy. After more than 20 years of direct subsidy payments, it is time to tell the mature renewable energy industry to get a job.”

The American Energy Alliance was joined in the letters by Americans for Prosperity, the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste, Freedom Action, The National Center for Public Policy Research, the Sixty Plus Association, and the Club for Growth.

To read AEA’s coalition letter opposing special tax treatment for natural gas vehicles, click here.

To read AEA’s coalition letter opposing extension of taxpayer-funded subsidies for renewable industries, click here.

###

In the Pipeline: 3/8/12

If only these guys had positions of authority, and resources they could use to address these issues, and . . . oh wait . ..National Journal (3/7/12) reports: Leaders of some of the world’s biggest oil and natural gas companies are issuing a plea to their industry to do a better job managing what they call the “shale gale”—vast resources of shale natural gas recently discovered throughout the United States and in other countries…“Let’s be honest, as an industry, we have not always done our best to engage in the public debates about these issues,” Peter Voser, CEO of Royal Dutch Shell, said on Wednesday at a speech during a major energy conference here. “This has resulted in some misconceptions taking root, especially about the impact of hydraulic fracturing, or ‘fracking.’ ”…Fracking is a controversial process where large amounts of water, chemicals, and sand are pumped into a well at high pressures to fracture rock and allow natural gas to escape. Environmental groups and residents who live near natural gas wells are concerned about potential water contamination.

So, it turns out that we don’t need to give Boone Pickens a bunch of our money.  Nor do we need to give Aubrey McClendon a bunch of our money.  Which is good, because those dudes are billionaires, and here at the Pipeline we are barely thousandaires.  It is also good because McClendon insists on bankrolling attacks ($100 million to the Lung Association, $25 million to the Sierra Club) on those who have concerns about EPA Yahoo (3/7/12) reports: More natural gas-powered vehicles will hit the market soon, as rising gasoline prices, booming natural gas production and proposed tax credits make them a more attractive option. But they’re a long way from being a common sight in U.S. driveways…Starting in July, Chrysler will sell a Ram 2500 Heavy Duty pickup that runs on compressed natural gas (CNG). The truck has both gasoline and natural gas storage tanks, and the engine shifts automatically between the two, without the driver needing to push a switch. The truck can run for 255 miles on natural gas and the range is extended to 367 miles using gasoline.

Actually, Mr. President, the fuel of the future is here and it’s oil Fox News (3/7/12) reports: President Barack Obama on Wednesday dismissed oil as “the fuel of the past” as he made an unapologetic election-year pitch for his alternative energy industry policies and sniped at Republicans over painfully high gasoline prices…”They get out on the campaign trail—and you and I both know there are no quick fixes to this problem—but listening to them, you’d think there were,” he said at a Daimler Truck manufacturing plant in the battleground state of North Carolina…Obama said that because the United States accounts for 20 percent of the world’s consumption of oil but has only 2 percent of its petroleum reserves, “we’re not going to be able to just drill our way out of the problem of high gas prices. Anybody who tells you otherwise either doesn’t know what they’re talking about or they aren’t telling you the truth.”

Speaking of which, does President Obama own stock in oil companies? Why else would he artificially make oil more expensive? Bloomberg (3/7/12) reports: U.S. House Republicans sought to link rising gasoline prices with President Barack Obama’s restrictions on offshore drilling and denial of the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, an argument rejected by Democrats…The Obama administration lacks the power to stem the increase, Democratic lawmakers said, and an energy analyst said U.S. consumers should get accustomed to price swings at the pump driven by consumers outside the U.S…Prices will “gyrate wildly” as demand increases in Asia and other emerging economies, Robert McNally, president of the Rapidan Group LLC, a Bethesda, Maryland-based energy research firm, said…“There is no silver bullet for a short-term solution,” he said, echoing words used by Obama in a Feb. 23 speech.

I wonder how this talking point is going to be graphed onto President Obama’s speeches on the economy Reuters (3/7/12) reports: A booming U.S. oil and gas sector was responsible for generating some 9 percent of all new jobs last year, with three indirect jobs for every one directly involved in the industry, a study released on Wednesday found…The World Economic Forum report, which highlighted the role that the energy industry can play in reviving the global economy, comes during a presidential election year as candidates argue about high U.S. unemployment and energy policy.

First step in becoming a 21st century millionaire, start a renewable energy company. Second step, make a donation to President Obama. Last step, collect your millions CNN (3/7/12) reports: The federal government spent $24 billion on energy subsidies in 2011, with the vast majority going to renewable energy sources, according to a government report…Renewable energy and energy efficiency accounted for $16 billion of the federal support, according to the Congressional Budget Office, while the fossil-fuel industry received $2.5 billion in tax breaks. This is a stark change from a decade ago. The CBO noted that until 2008, most energy subsidies went to the fossil-fuel industry. The idea at the time was to encourage more domestic oil production, especially when the price of oil was low…CBO said the $24 billion total is a small fraction of the hundreds of billions the government’s various annual subsidies, which take the form of both grants and tax breaks.

AEA’s Thomas Pyle responds to Obama press conference

“Instead of unleashing lawyers at the Justice Department, the president should unleash the Interior Department to open the outer continental shelf.” — AEA President Thomas J. Pyle

WASHINGTON D.C. — Thomas J. Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance, issued today the following statement in response to President Obama’s Mar. 6 press conference:

“President Obama continues to offer inadequate solutions and deceptive talking points instead of policies that will promote affordable energy for American consumers. When asked about rising gas prices, the President promised to promote drilling in Sudan, relieve pipeline bottlenecks that the federal government has no control over, and sick Attorney General Eric Holder on free markets with yet another ‘task force.’

“Why the president believes that gas prices are more closely tied to increased drilling in Sudan than exploration in North America is inconceivable. Currently, only 3 percent of U.S. federal lands are being utilized for exploration. Moreover, given his statements during the press conference, President Obama apparently wants the U.S. to rely more on Sudan than on our closest trade partner, Canada, for oil supplies. Otherwise he would have approved the Keystone XL pipeline.

“Already, the United States is the world’s third largest oil producer, and with the vast resources we have under our feet, there is no reason why we can’t be the first. In the process, we could create hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs that would grow our economy and increase our energy security.

“Americans are paying historic prices for gasoline, and the president offers another task force headed by Attorney General Eric Holder. Instead of unleashing lawyers at the Justice Department , he should unleash the Interior Department to open the Outer Continental Shelf, ANWR, and millions of acres of federal lands to energy development.

“The American people deserve either new energy policies or new leadership, and perhaps both.”

###

AEA President Thomas Pyle responds to Obama energy speech

For Immediate Release
February 23, 2012

“If the president is serious about our energy future, he would put a restraining order on the Department of the Interior to stop the administration’s job-killing embargo on American energy.” — AEA President Thomas Pyle

WASHINGTON D.C. — President Barack Obama delivered today a widely-anticipated speech outlining his administration’s energy policies, which include provisions that raise taxes on energy producers, increase dependence on foreign sources, impose sanctions on domestic production and double down on taxpayer handouts to administration allies in the renewable sector.  Thomas Pyle, president of the American Energy Alliance, issued the following statement in response to the president’s speech:

“Today’s speech made for perfect election year posturing to satisfy the president’s anti-energy base. But such posturing does little to help American consumers who can’t afford $6 per gallon gasoline for the cars they own, and certainly can’t afford the $40K electric cars that the President wants to force us to buy.

“The president had the temerity to claim credit for increases in domestic oil and gas production, even though production on federal lands declined last year. Clearly, the facts tell a different story. Production on lands controlled by the administration dropped by 11 percent for oil and 6 percent for natural gas in 2011. Taking credit for production increases in light of his administration’s sustained efforts to block federal lands from energy development is the definition of political deceit.

“Once again, the president has attacked his favorite bogeymen in the oil and gas industries, calling for discriminatory tax increases on job creators that currently sustain millions of working men and women in a tough economy. Undeterred, the president now proposes policies that will actually raise the price of gasoline higher than it already is. At its core, today’s speech was more of the same failed prescriptions that lead to higher energy prices and less stability in a global market.

“If the president is serious about our energy future, he would grant a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline, open up the outer continental shelf to previously agreed territories in the Gulf of Mexico, off the Eastern coast and Alaska, and put a restraining order on the Department of the Interior to stop the administration’s job-killing embargo on American energy.”

###

Ghost Town? How onerous regulations are killing a Craig, Colorado

For Immediate Release
February 21, 2012

WASHINGTON D.C. —  The American Energy Alliance released Tuesday a video telling the story of Craig, Colo., a small town of approximately 10,000 people and home to the Centennial State’s largest coal-fired power generating plant.  But due to Colorado’s energy mandate that requires 30 percent of the state’s electricity generation come from wind, solar, and other renewable sources by the year 2020, and an increasingly hostile regulatory regime at the federal Environmental Protection Agency, Craig is facing tremendous economic uncertainty.

“Everybody in that town is tied to coal-fired energy. If those coal units shut down, and if the coal mines shut down, then Craig shuts down,” noted AEA President Thomas Pyle.

“Between EPA’s plan to retire 10 percent of the nation’s coal-fired generating capacity and onerous state renewable mandates, the Obama agenda is clear: bankrupt the people who are providing affordable coal-fired energy and turn places like Craig into a Ghost Town.

“Really what’s happening in Colorado is a perfect storm of federal regulations hammering down on the energy industry and state regulations that are having a tremendous impact on the cost of electricity.”

The AEA-produced video profiles the damaging effects that state and federal regulations are having on Craig’s economy. Among the people experiencing the regulatory shakedown are Frank and Kerrie Moe, small business owners who operate one of Craig’s only hotels.

“Whether it’s the power plant or the mines or the supply companies, I’d say about 60 percent of our business is energy-related,” Frank Moe explains in the video.

“It was the first time that we’ve been in business in 15 years that we were forced into doing layoffs,” Kerrie Moe added.

The video is a part of AEA’s Energy For America campaign, a joint effort with The Institute for Energy Research and Americans for Prosperity to educate people about the North America’s abundant natural resources and the perversity of federal and state policies that limit access to these resources.

To watch the video “The Perfect Storm Over Craig, Colorado,” click here.

To read more about the harmful effects of EPA’s regulatory assault on coal-fired power, click here.

To read more about North America’s vast coal resources, click here.

###

The Perfect Storm over Craig, Colorado

The town of Craig, CO is dependent on the production of affordable and reliable coal energy. The onslaught of federal and state regulations on coal energy is causing this town economic hardship. Many do not realize that policy have direct consequences on individual lives. Learn how you can help help Craig, CO by going to:

www.energyforamerica.org

In the Pipeline: 2/6/12

Well, this is the sort of thing one has to expect when one climbs into bed with “businessmen” who take money from the federal government.  If they have no respect for taxpayers, why would they have any respect for desert ecosystems? Los Angeles Times (2/6/12) reports: Reporting from Ivanpah Valley, Calif.— Construction cranes rise like storks 40 stories above the Mojave Desert. In their midst, the “power tower” emerges, wrapped in scaffolding and looking like a multistage rocket…Clustered nearby are hangar-sized assembly buildings, looming berms of sand and a chain mail of fencing that will enclose more than 3,500 acres of public land. Moorings for 173,500 mirrors — each the size of a garage door — are spiked into the desert floor. Before the end of the year, they will become six square miles of gleaming reflectors, sweeping from Interstate 15 to the Clark Mountains along California’s eastern border…BrightSource Energy’s Ivanpah solar power project will soon be a humming city with 24-hour lighting, a wastewater processing facility and a gas-fired power plant. To make room, BrightSource has mowed down a swath of desert plants, displaced dozens of animal species and relocated scores of imperiled desert tortoises, a move that some experts say could kill up to a third of them.

Surprise:  New York Times expresses concern about citizens getting involved in local government New York Times (2/6/12) reports: Across the country, activists with ties to the Tea Party are railing against all sorts of local and state efforts to control sprawl and conserve energy. They brand government action for things like expanding public transportation routes and preserving open space as part of a United Nations-led conspiracy to deny property rights and herd citizens toward cities.

I wonder what John Rockefeller would think about his people trying to raise the cost of energy in North America.  The lesson is clear folks:  spend all your money; leave none of it for your idiot children and grandchildren Heritage Blog (2/6/12) reports: Details of a large non-profit’s plans to combat the Keystone XL pipeline have surfaced, and offer some insight into the strategies and tactics of groups looking to combat the use of fossil fuels…Canadian news channel Sun News uncovered of a PowerPoint presentation from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund detailing its work with other groups to derail the Keystone XL pipeline and other similar projects it deemed parts of “a globally significant threat.”…The presentation, written in 2008, describes the allocation of $7 million to environmental non-profits for tactics that include the use of the legislative and legal systems to delay or derail energy production in the United States and Canada, and to “raise the costs” of energy in both nations.

Too bad some European countries have banned hydraulic fracturing. Who knew that producing natural gas domestically might be more reliable than the Russians? Fuel Fix (2/6/12) reports: The European Union is bracing for another potential energy crisis in the dead of winter as Russian gas supplies to some member states have suddenly dwindled by up to 30 percent…The European Commission put its gas coordination committee on alert Friday, but insisted the situation had not yet reached an emergency level as nations have pledged to help each other if needed and storage facilities have been upgraded…Commission spokeswoman Marlene Holzner said Russia was going through an extremely cold spell and needed more gas to keep its citizens warm…She said that Russia’s gas contracts “allow for certain flexibility in case they also need the gas. And that is the situation that Russia is facing at the moment.” The severe winter in Russia has seen temperatures drop to minus 35 C (minus 30 F).

You say you want a revolution…Tory MPs write a very stern letter saying they are against wind subsidies Telegraph (2/6/12) reports: A total of 101 Tory MPs have written to the Prime Minister demanding that the £400 million-a-year subsidies paid to the “inefficient” onshore wind turbine industry are “dramatically cut”…The backbenchers, joined by some MPs from other parties, have also called on Mr Cameron to tighten up planning laws so local people have a better chance of stopping new farms being developed and protecting the countryside…The demands will be a headache for Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat Energy Secretary, who joined the Cabinet on Friday when Chris Huhne resigned after being charged with perverting the course of justice.

In the Pipeline: 1/3/12

Keep in mind, CSAPR was the “solid” rule.  What do you figure the courts are going to do with the utility MACT, the boiler MACT, and the GHG rules?  It is pretty much the beginning of the end for EPA’s run of lawlessness The Hill (1/2/12) reports: A federal appeals court ruled Friday that the Environmental Protection Agency must delay implementation of pending regulations aimed at limiting harmful power plant pollution that crosses state lines…The ruling prevents EPA from implementing the cross-state air pollution rule — which would put new limits on sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from power plant smokestacks in 27 Eastern states — on Jan. 1, as scheduled…EPA said the power plant emissions travel across state lines, threatening the health of thousands of people.

What do strippers and the Arizona housing market have in common? North Dakota U.S.A Today (1/3/12) reports: “It boils down to the weather and taking advantage of the market,” says real estate agent Rocky Parra of HomeSmart Realty in Gilbert, Ariz., a Phoenix suburb…He and wife Beverly, a native of Minot, N.D., have sold eight homes to North Dakotans in recent months. Parra is heading to North Dakota this month to meet with possible buyers…”A lot of people have struck it rich,” he says. “Oil companies are coming in and buying businesses and land. They’re selling up there at the peak and buying down here at the bottom.”…Some want second homes. Others move outright…Blaine Bjella, 41, still owns three auto body and truck accessories businesses in his native Williston, N.D., the hub of the state’s oil bonanza, which has pushed the state’s unemployment rate to the lowest level in the nation (3.4%).

This guy completely gets it.  Oil and gas are important.  And peak oil is ridiculous Foreign Policy (1/2/12) reports: Bad year for petro-tyrants: Did today’s trouble for petrocrats truly originate with Muhamad al-Bouazizi, the Tunisian fruit-and-vegetable seller whose self-imolation a year ago preceded the Arab Spring? I don’t think so. Before Tunisia and Egypt, before the crumbling of the Berlin Wall and the Soviet collapse, before the rise of Benazir Bhutto, and before even the fall of Chun Doo-Hwan and the birth of South Korean democracy — there was Corazon Aquino’s People Power revolution in the Philippines. At this moment 26 years ago, yellow-clad Aquino supporters with their ubiquitous “L” signs, made with outstretched thumb and forefinger (in photo above, re-enacted earlier this year in a Manila celebration), seemed quaintly outmatched by then-dictator Ferdinand Marcos as they prepared for a snap presidential election. Yet, just two weeks after a fraudulent count gave Marcos the victory, a pair of military men defected, setting off the massive crowds of EDSA, Marcos’ ignominious flight out of the country aboard a U.S. aircraft, and his exile in Hawaii. The remarkable string of democratic breakouts in the quarter-century since — regardless of their imperfection in action — began on EDSA, with the Laban hand signs, and Freddie Aguilar’s haunting renditions of “Bayan Ko.”

So, in addition to being wrong, and hanging around with Ms. Delassandro (that’s Nancy Pelosi), he is a bit of a chicken CBS (1/2/12) reports: Newt Gingrich says he has killed a chapter on climate change in a post-election book of essays about the environment. But the intended author of the chapter, who supports the scientific consensus that humans contribute to climate change, says that’s news to her…Katharine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist at Texas Tech, confirmed in an email interview that she had been asked to write a chapter on climate change for the speaker’s book. She said was approached by former Palm Beach Zoo CEO Terry Maple, Gingrich’s co-editor, at an annual meeting of Republicans for Environmental Protection. Asked to confirm her chapter was dropped, she replied, “I had not heard that.”

Call it Bad Karma — Fisker issues a recall on their luxury electric car vehicles out of fear they might catch fire Business Green (1/2/12) reports: Fisker Automotive says it has fixed “a majority” of its 2012 Karma plug-in hybrid sports cars, just two weeks after the company that makes its battery packs identified a potential fire hazard…All 239 of the models manufactured to date were recalled when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration warned improperly installed hose clamps in the car’s battery pack could cause coolant to leak and result in electrical shorts… While Fisker insists no incidents have been reported by customers or retailers, a company statement issued yesterday said many cars are back in service after having brand new battery packs fitted or repairs carried out to the hose clamp assembly…Remaining customers have been contacted for appointments to fix the $103,000 cars, it added.

Barack Obama receives Solyndra stock in AEA Award

WASHINGTON D.C. — Now in the twelfth and final day of the 2011 Lump of Coal Award announcements, the American Energy Alliance has concluded this year’s tribute to the politicians, policymakers, and others who have proven the worst enemies of affordable American energy. Today’s recipient is the 44th president of the United States, Barack Obama.

In a late decision on Thursday evening, the “Lump of Coal” Awards Committee determined that the president’s unique hostilities to conventional energy sources required a modification of the award. Rather than present President Obama with a lump of coal — a most valuable commodity — AEA has replaced the final award this year with a share of Solyndra stock. To see a video entitled “The Story of Solyndra & the Obama Administration,” click below:

“President Obama didn’t deserve a lump of coal this year, quite honestly,” noted AEA President Tom Pyle in the award announcement. “For energy policies that are worthless, the Committee determined that the President deserved something equally worthless.

“Before taking office, President Obama promised that energy prices would necessarily skyrocket during his administration, and so they have. Americans are now paying more for gasoline during Christmas than at any time in history. The new EPA regulations on coal-fired power plants are going to cost consumers more than $11 billion over the next 5 years. And then there are costs that cannot be fully measured.

“The cost of delaying final authorization of the Keystone XL pipeline is more than $70 million every day, yet the president won’t make a decision. The cost of the president’s moratorium on offshore drilling was more than $2 billion in the first six months. The bureaucratic delays in permitting, and the failure to open federal lands for exploration are costing Americans untold billions more.

“The current boom in oil and natural gas production — and the tens of thousands of jobs associated with it — is happening despite the president’s green fetish. In North Dakota, for instance, the federal government controls only a tiny fraction of the available acreage. It’s no wonder that the Peace Garden State has the lowest unemployment in the country.

“The president and his energy team backed Solyndra, assuring Americans that $535 million in taxpayer guarantees for the company would create jobs and strengthen our energy future. Today, Solyndra is bankrupt and 1,100 workers are unemployed. More than anything, Solyndra represents the failed energy policies of this Administration. We felt it was only appropriate to give him a share of its worthless stock to commemorate the effects that his administration is having on the country, the economy, and our energy future.”

###