Biden’s Energy Policies Leading To Fuel Shortages

According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the United States now has less than 25 days of diesel stocks, the lowest level since 2008—and down from 34.2 days during the previous four weeks. The fuel is already being rationed in the Northeast, with suppliers in several states forced to conserve heating oil as the winter months approach. New England’s stockpiles are at less than a third of their usual levels for this time of year and the lowest levels since April 1992, which is concerning since those states rely on the fuel for heating more than any other part of the country. Diesel is also used for transporting goods as well as powering construction, farming and military vehicles and equipment. Unlike gasoline and jet fuel, demand for diesel recovered at a much faster pace from the coronavirus pandemic. In 2021, the U.S. transportation sector consumed 46.82 billion gallons, or 1.11 billion barrels of diesel fuel — at an average of about 128 million gallons a day.

Total national diesel stockpiles are at 106.187 million barrels, down about 34 percent since Biden took office. According to EIA, demand eased in the past week, coming in at 4.072 million barrels, although consumption is still up nearly 20 percent compared to the previous four weeks.

The national average price of diesel as of October 24 was at $5.34 a gallon — $1.63 more than last year. Traders are paying more for prompt deliveries than longer-term deliveries as they expect prices to drop in the future — a downward market structure known as “backwardation.” The market usually moves into “contango” — the opposite of backwardation, where demand is lower and suppliers build up inventory with the expectation of higher future prices in the summer. However, strong domestic and international demand, shrinking domestic refining capacity and sanctions on Russian petroleum imports have kept the diesel market tight throughout the year.

The Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve holds one million barrels of diesel in case of a disruption in supplies. However, diesel demand is so high, that if a million barrels of diesel were delivered from the Northeast reserve, those barrels would be depleted in less than six hours.

Biden’s Strategies

The Biden administration recently announced it would be tapping into the country’s emergency oil reserves again to counter rising gasoline and diesel prices, despite concerns over the long-term efficacy. Due to the Biden Administration’s depleting the reserve since November 2021, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is at levels not seen since June 1984. In November, Biden tapped the reserve for 50 million barrels of oil ahead of Thanksgiving. In March, Biden tapped the reserve again for 30 million barrels at the onset of Russia’s war with Ukraine. Shortly thereafter, Biden followed up that release with the 180 million barrel drawn down. Biden is now tapping the last 15 million barrels of the 180 million barrels just before Election Day to keep prices from rising as the electorate goes to the polls.

By the end of the year, Biden will have depleted 260 million barrels of oil from the reserve, which has an authorized capacity of 714 million barrels. The reserve now holds about 400 million barrels of oil, marking its lowest level since June 1984. The emergency petroleum reserve, established in the 1970s to prepare the United States for a sudden and severe disruption in supply is being used by the Biden administration to keep gasoline and diesel prices from rising.

White House officials are also considering petroleum export restrictions. Banning or limiting the export of refined products would likely decrease inventory levels, reduce domestic refining capacity through closures or conversion to biofuels, put upward pressure on consumer fuel prices and alienate U.S. allies during a time of war. In California, refiners producing biofuels currently receive a premium of $3.70 per gallon. Setting minimum inventory levels could also affect the number of exports being sent out to foreign countries. And even if domestic supply sees some relief, prices could still be pushed up around the rest of the world.

Meanwhile, two vessels carrying about 90,000 tons of diesel and jet fuel are scheduled to arrive in New York after being diverted from their original European destinations. In addition, Delta Air Lines’ Trainer refinery in Pennsylvania is poised to return from seasonal maintenance, which will help increase diesel output. Since 2020, the United States lost about 1 million barrels per day in operable refining capacity. Over the past decade, the number of refineries dropped to 129; in the Northeast, only seven refineries remain. Refinery utilization rates have been averaging above 90 percent. Despite knowing how tight the refinery market is, Biden is doing nothing to encourage more refineries to be built or expanding existing ones.

Conclusion

U.S. diesel inventories are unacceptably low as demand is surging ahead of winter — with only 25 days of supply left. The low level of inventory and the escalating prices, over $5 a gallon, has gotten the attention of the White House going into the mid-term elections. Diesel is the second largest cost to the trucking industry, after labor, and the high diesel prices will continue to affect inflation through the production and delivery of food and merchandise. As the SPR is being decimated of the quality of oil that U.S. refiners need, Biden is running out of ways to bring prices down. Further, the Northeast is in dire shape as winter approaches with distillate stocks down by about a third, inadequate pipeline capacity and fracking bans. The Northeast is taking on many of the characteristics of Europe when it comes to energy.


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

The Unregulated Podcast #106: Goodnight Everybody

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast, Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna discuss the future of the Yankees, midterm elections, and Bono’s midlife crisis.

Links:

Senator Hassan (D-NH) Receives Zero Percent Score From American Energy Alliance

WASHINGTON DC (10/27/22) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA), the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization, released it’s annual Congressional Scorecard last week.  The AEA scorecard scores voting and co-sponsorship decisions on legislation affecting energy and environmental policy, educating voters on how their senators vote and holding members accountable for those decisions.  This year’s Senate scorecard compiles 28 votes and 1 co-sponsorship decision from the full 6-year terms of the Senators up for reelection in 2022.  

Sen. Margaret Wood Hassan (D-NH) received a score of zero percent from the American Energy Alliance. 

The American Energy Scorecard is guided by the following core principles:

  • Promoting affordable, abundant, and reliable energy
  • Expanding economic opportunity and prosperity, particularly for working families and those on fixed incomes
  • Giving Americans, not Washington bureaucrats, the power to make their own energy choices
  • Encouraging private sector innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Advancing market-oriented energy and environment policies
  • Reducing the role of government in energy markets
  • Eliminating the subsidies, mandates, and special interest giveaways that lead to higher energy costs

 AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement: 

“Voters in New Hampshire have seen the effects of energy policies that put energy consumers last, leading to high energy prices and an impending fuel and gas shortage.  Sen. Hassan’s score reflects her abysmal record of supporting policies that would provide consumers access to affordable and reliable energy in New Hampshire.  

Time after time, Sen. Hassan has voted for policies that make electricity, gasoline, and home heating more expensive for New Hampshire and make America more dependent on other nations – like China and the Middle East – for our energy. 

New Hampshire currently has the eighth highest electricity prices in the country.  Instead of working to provide relief for Granite State residents from high electricity and home heating prices, Sen. Hassan has sided with proponents of the Green New Deal. That’s a bad deal for New Hampshire.”

Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact: 

[email protected]

Rep. Khanna Begs OPEC For Oil While Chastising American Producers

Representative Khanna (CA-D) publicly called for energy producers to DECREASE domestic oil production last fall, now that gas prices are rising he loudly complains those same producers aren’t doing enough! Instead of working to unleash American energy Rep. Khanna is busy begging OPEC to bring down gas prices ahead of the midterms!

The Unregulated Podcast #105: There Will Be Consequences

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast, Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna are joined by Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, for a discussion on the future of American conservatism and the role to be played by The Heritage Foundation.

Links:

Hidden Dangers of Biden’s EV Agenda Revealed By Hurricane Ian

Without water and electricity for a week or more, residents in Southwest Florida felt like they were in a war zone. Despite waiting for hours for a fill-up or to obtain gas for generators, motorists were thankful they had an internal combustion engine vehicle because electric vehicle owners without power could not charge their vehicles at home and many charging stations, which did not have power either, were under water. But the most frightening aspect of electric vehicle ownership in the aftermath of Hurricane Ian was that water damage caused batteries to corrode and catch fire. The washed-up saltwater induces rapid corrosion, which can cause the lithium-ion battery in a flooded electric vehicle to malfunction and ultimately catch on fire. Test results show that salt bridges can form within the battery pack and provide a path for short circuit and self-heating, which can lead to fire ignition. And lithium batteries do not require oxygen to burn, as they are a chemical fire and therefore must be treated differently. As with other forms of battery degradation, the time period from self-heating to fire ignition can vary greatly.

This threat forced local fire departments to divert resources away from hurricane recovery to control and contain the fires. Car fires from electric vehicles last for a prolonged period, and in many cases, taking up to six hours to burn out. Even after the car fires are extinguished, they can reignite in an instant. Car fires can become life-threatening if water-damaged electric cars are parked near houses or in garages. Some Florida homes were lost to fires caused by flooded electric vehicles.

Source: Autoracing1.com

According to the Washington Times, even 1,500 gallons of water were not enough to fully extinguish a fire that was caused by the defective battery inside a Tesla Model X. Firefighters in Florida are receiving special training that teaches them how to quickly and safely extinguish a burning electric car.  Florida currently ranks second in the nation for electric vehicles with 95,640 registrations as of December 31, 2021, second to California’s 563,070 registered electric vehicles.

This is a new concern for Biden’s Department of Transportation as President Biden wants 50 percent of new car sales to be all electric by 2030. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has been a strong proponent of electric vehicles, even suggesting that high gas prices were a good thing because people might be more likely to buy a battery-powered vehicle. Florida Senator Rick Scott wrote to the Secretary with his concerns about electric vehicle fires.

To reach the target set of 50 percent electric vehicles by 2030, the Biden administration is offering incentives for electric vehicles while investing heavily in its infrastructure. The Inflation Reduction Act continues the $7500 tax credit for new electric vehicle purchases and allows a smaller tax credit for used electric vehicles. However, the only electric vehicles eligible for the $7,500 tax credit in the climate/tax bill are ones made in North America using batteries with minerals obtained from U.S. mines or from its allies. While the United States has some of the needed minerals, regulatory roadblocks and lawsuits from environmentalists are in the way of developing those mining industries. A new mine in the United States can take seven to 10 years to complete all the permitting and paperwork before going online while in Canada and Australia, that process only takes two to three years. One mine in Minnesota (Twin Metals) has been waiting to get the go-ahead to mine since 1966.

California officially banned the sale of new gasoline-powered cars and trucks by 2035 with New York following in its footsteps. In both cases, the state rules would apply to all new cars, pickup trucks and SUVs. The regulations establish annual targets for the share of zero-emission vehicles automakers must sell in the state, starting at 35 percent in 2026, ramping up to 68 percent by 2030, and 100 percent by 2035. Some car makers, such as GM, have bought into the electric vehicle transition and are working toward an eventual phase-out of gas-powered vehicles, regardless of their safety and what the American public wants.

Electric vehicle prices average $66,000–far higher than conventional autos, keeping them out of reach for most consumers. Finding the lithium and other metals needed for their batteries is a costly challenge and puts China, who dominates the supply chain for electric vehicle batteries in the driver’s seat, making the United States dependent on a Communist country and our chief competitor for energy.  The United States is almost four times more dependent upon China for the electric vehicle supply chain than it was dependent upon the Middle East for oil.

Conclusion

The Biden Administration is faced with a new challenge regarding electric vehicles. In the aftermath of Hurricane Ian, electric vehicle batteries flooded with salt water corroded and caught fire causing dangerous fires that are prolonged and, in some cases, igniting fires in houses that survived the destruction of the hurricane. This challenge adds to other challenges of electric vehicles, including their cost, the critical minerals needed to make them, our reliance on China for batteries and other components, the charging infrastructure needed, and the large demand that will be placed on the U.S. generating system, which in itself is expected to undergo a major transition to renewable energy that requires even more of these critical metals. The dream of some to force electric vehicles on the American public is meeting the realities of real-world life and so far, problems are abounding.


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

Biden Drains Strategic Petroleum Reserves Ahead of Midterms

Average U.S. gasoline prices hit $3.89 a gallon on October 17, up about 20 cents from a month ago, 56 cents higher than last year at this time, and $1.35 a gallon higher than when Biden took office on January 20, 2021. In March, gasoline prices hit $4 a gallon and then moved up to a record $5 a gallon in June. According to the White House, it plans to take action to prevent those high prices from occurring again. As the mid-term election approaches, the Biden administration is reportedly preparing to sell the 14 million barrels of Strategic Petroleum Reserve oil leftover from its 180-million-barrel SPR release program that began in May. It may also release an additional 26 million barrels of SPR oil in fiscal 2023 that began this month, which is required by Congress to raise money to pay for some of its earlier spending. The administration has a few weeks before the midterms to try to lower gasoline prices, or demonstrate that it is trying to do so.

The Department of Energy (DOE) is also supposed to release this week further details on eventually refilling the SPR. The administration spoke with energy companies about buying back oil through 2025 to replenish the oil it sold from the SPR. The Biden Administration had also asked Saudi Arabia to hold off on OPEC+ production cuts until after the midterm elections, suggesting that the United States would buy 200 million barrels of oil to fill the SPR in return.

In May, the DOE said it would launch bids late this year for a buy-back of about one-third of the 180 million barrel sale, supposedly linking deliveries to lower oil prices and lower demand, likely after fiscal year 2023, which ends September 30, 2023. The Biden administration also urged oil refiners to not increase exports of petroleum products and warned them it could take action if plants do not build inventories. The Biden administration considered imposing a ban on gasoline and diesel exports, but doing so would exacerbate Europe’s energy crisis and raise domestic prices.

While prior administrations have had SPR releases, they have been used to avert short-run price increases due to emergency circumstances, such as the price run-ups during the Persian Gulf War and immediately after Hurricane Katrina. Prior administrations viewed the domestic production of fossil fuels as a positive and necessary objective, compared to Biden’s climate policies that seek to end the use of fossil fuels. Even President Obama boasted about the benefit of U.S. energy production.

Biden’s policies, however, conflict with the administration’s desperate attempts to avoid sharp increases in gasoline prices. At least, that appears to be the case prior to the midterm elections. Biden has imposed constraints on domestic oil production while begging Saudi Arabia for increases in output. Since the latter did not work, Biden released oil from the SPR several times to avoid the political jam that his anti–oil-and-gas policies created, leaving the reserve’s inventory at a 40-year low. U.S. commercial oil in storage is now higher than oil stocks in SPR. While he is manipulating domestic gas and diesel prices by using the SPR, Biden wants to sue OPEC members for “price manipulation.”  This is after he restricted supplies by offering the fewest federal acres for oil and gas leasing since WWII.

Despite high market prices, domestic crude-oil production this year is averaging about 9 percent below its pre-pandemic peak of almost 13 million barrels per day. In 2020, the U.S. Energy Information Administration was forecasting that the United States would be producing more than 14 million barrels of oil per day in a much lower price environment. Today’s domestic oil production is over 2 million barrels short of that forecast.

According to a study by the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, the United States would be producing two to three million more barrels of oil a day if the Trump energy policies were intact. Biden’s policies of canceling pipelines, reducing drilling permits, and establishing anti-fossil fuel EPA rules are costing the U.S. economy almost $2 billion a week. His climate/tax bill (the so-called Inflation Reduction Act) hits the domestic oil industry with massive fee and royalty increases. Even production on non-federal lands gets hit with a methane tax of up to $1500 per ton. If the Trump policies were still in place U.S. oil production would be nearly five times higher than the amount of oil depleted from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The SPR is at its lowest level since the summer of 1984.

Conclusion

Biden is risking U.S. national security by constantly going to the SPR to counter increases in gas and diesel prices that result from his anti-oil and gas policies. He now wants to sell 14 million barrels of oil from the SPR to counter the gas price increases over the past several weeks. His depletion of SPR oil reserves can only last until the stockpiles are exhausted, and replenishing the stockpiles would take years—perhaps the final two years of his current term in office. Until he refills SPR, however, there is little of the type of oil U.S. refiners need left in the SPR to counter the price increases resulting from his continued anti-oil and gas policies. That means that by “high-grading” the SPR of the oil refiners can easily process, the United States is left with less desirable product should a real emergency result. The increased royalties and rents in the Inflation Reduction Act have yet to show up in consumer prices, so the combination of all of these policies will translate to higher prices for Americans after the November election.

Unlike the president’s short-term SPR releases, changing his policies to be pro-oil and gas, producing 2 to 3 million more barrels of oil every day for years to come would be a long-term fix that would actually lower prices for American families and improve the U.S. economy and our national security.


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

American Energy Alliance 2022 Senate Scorecard

This week the American Energy Alliance released its American Energy Scorecard for the United States Senate.  The AEA scorecard scores voting and co-sponsorship decisions on legislation affecting energy and environmental policy, educating voters on how their senators vote and holding members accountable for those decisions.  This year’s Senate scorecard compiles 28 votes and 1 co-sponsorship decision from the full 6-year terms of the Senators up for reelection in 2022. Six Senators achieved better than a 90% score over their full term of office.

The American Energy Scorecard is guided by the following core principles:

  • Promoting affordable, abundant, and reliable energy
  • Expanding economic opportunity and prosperity, particularly for working families and those on fixed incomes
  • Giving Americans, not Washington bureaucrats, the power to make their own energy choices
  • Encouraging private sector innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Advancing market-oriented energy and environment policies
  • Reducing the role of government in energy markets
  • Eliminating the subsidies, mandates, and special interest giveaways that lead to higher energy costs

All members are notified in advance that AEA plans to score an upcoming vote. The scored votes in the last three Congresses cover a range of energy and environmental policy issues.

One co-sponsorship decision was scored, in this case scored against (meaning not cosponsoring scored positively). This was the resolution supporting a Green New Deal, which sought to control every aspect of the economy through controlling energy decisions.

To see a full list of how senators did over their six-year term click here.

AEA applauds the 6 Senators who demonstrated support for affordable energy and free markets over their six-year term.

  • Sen. Mike Lee
  • Sen. James Lankford
  • Sen. Rand Paul
  • Sen. Ron Johnson
  • Sen. John Kennedy
  • Sen. Jerry Moran

For more information on how these issues impact the election check out the latest research and analysis from AEA’s team of policy experts.

American Energy Alliance Releases Congressional Scorecard

WASHINGTON DC (10/19/2022) – This week, the American Energy Alliance (AEA), the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization, released its American Energy Scorecard for the current Senate and the House of Representatives.

The American Energy Scorecard is guided by the following core principles:

  • Promoting affordable, abundant, and reliable energy
  • Expanding economic opportunity and prosperity, particularly for working families and those on fixed incomes
  • Giving Americans, not Washington bureaucrats, the power to make their own energy choices
  • Encouraging private sector innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Advancing market-oriented energy and environment policies
  • Reducing the role of government in energy markets
  • Eliminating the subsidies, mandates, and special interest giveaways that lead to higher energy costs


AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement:

“With the failed energy policies in Europe and the war in Ukraine, it has become even clearer that access to affordable and reliable energy must be a top priority for American policymakers. Voters deserve to know where their elected officials stand on matters related to the promotion of affordable, reliable, American energy. AEA congratulates the American Energy Champions in the House and Senate. These elected officials are committed to American energy production and all the benefits that it entails both at home and around the world.”


This year’s House of Representatives scorecard compiles seven votes from the 117th Congress. 177 House members achieved a 100 percent score. While AEA applauds all the members who achieved 100 percent, we must also note those members whose voting record was especially harmful for their districts. Reps. Henry Cuellar (14 percent score) and Matt Cartwright (0 percent score) both represent major energy-producing districts. Yet their scores don’t reflect a member working for their local industry. Likewise, Reps. Jared Golden (29 percent score), Sharice Davids (0 percent score), Chris Pappas (11 percent), Susie Lee (14 percent), Elaine Luria (0 percent), Kim Schrier (0 percent), Elissa Slotkin (0 percent), Angie Craig (0 percent), Abigail Spanberger (0 percent), Jennifer Wexton (0 percent), Cynthia Axne (0 percent), Tom O’Halleran (0 percent), Tom Malinowski (0 percent), and Dina Titus (0 percent) represent areas where major employers rely on affordable, reliable energy.

This year’s Senate scorecard compiles 28 votes and 1 co-sponsorship decision from the full 6-year terms of the Senators up for reelection in 2022. Six Senators achieved better than a 90 percent score over their full term of office, while 14 Senators scored below 75 percent.

Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

American Energy Alliance 2022 House of Representatives Scorecard

This week the American Energy Alliance released its American Energy Scorecard for the House of Representatives. The AEA scorecard scores voting and co-sponsorship decisions on legislation affecting energy and environmental policy, educating voters on how their representatives vote and holding members accountable for those decisions. This year’s scorecard compiles 7 votes from the 117th Congress. 177 House members achieved a 100% score.

The American Energy Scorecard is guided by the following core principles:

  • Promoting affordable, abundant, and reliable energy
  • Expanding economic opportunity and prosperity, particularly for working families and those on fixed incomes
  • Giving Americans, not Washington bureaucrats, the power to make their own energy choices
  • Encouraging private sector innovation and entrepreneurship
  • Advancing market-oriented energy and environment policies
  • Reducing the role of government in energy markets
  • Eliminating the subsidies, mandates, and special interest giveaways that lead to higher energy costs

All members are notified in advance that AEA plans to score an upcoming vote. The scored votes in the 117th Congress cover a range of energy and environmental policy issues.

While AEA applauds all the members who achieved 100%, we must also note those members whose voting record was especially harmful for their districts. Reps. Henry Cuellar (14% score) and Matt Cartwright (0% score) both represent major energy-producing districts. Yet their scores don’t reflect a member working for their local industry. Likewise, Reps. Jared Golden (29% score), Sharice Davids (0% score), Chris Pappas (11%), Susie Lee (14%), Elaine Luria (0%), Kim Schrier (0%), Elissa Slotkin (0%), Angie Craig (0%), Abigail Spanberger (0%), Jennifer Wexton (0%), Cynthia Axne (0%), Tom O’Halleran (0%), Tom Malinowski (0%), and Dina Titus (0%) represent areas where major employers rely on affordable, reliable energy. It is important for voters in these districts who appreciate affordable energy and free choices to know the poor records of their representatives.

The full list of American Energy Champions:

  • Rep. A. Ferguson
  • Rep. Adrian Smith
  • Rep. Alex Mooney
  • Rep. Andrew Clyde
  • Rep. Andy Biggs
  • Rep. Andy Barr
  • Rep. Andy Harris
  • Rep. Ann Wagner
  • Rep. Ashley Hinson
  • Rep. August Pfluger
  • Rep. Austin Scott
  • Rep. Barry Loudermilk
  • Rep. Barry Moore
  • Rep. Ben Cline
  • Rep. Beth Van Duyne
  • Rep. Bill Huizenga
  • Rep. Bill Johnson
  • Rep. Bill Posey
  • Rep. Billy Long
  • Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer
  • Rep. Blake Moore
  • Rep. Bob Gibbs
  • Rep. Brad Wenstrup
  • Rep. Brett Guthrie
  • Rep. Brian Babin
  • Rep. Bruce Westerman
  • Rep. Bryan Steil
  • Rep. Buddy Carter
  • Rep. Burgess Owens
  • Rep. Byron Donalds
  • Rep. Carlos Giménez
  • Rep. Carol Miller
  • Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers
  • Rep. Chip Roy
  • Rep. Chris Jacobs
  • Rep. Chris Stewart
  • Rep. Chuck Fleischmann
  • Rep. Claudia Tenney
  • Rep. Clay Higgins
  • Rep. Cliff Bentz
  • Rep. Dan Bishop
  • Rep. Dan Crenshaw
  • Rep. Dan Newhouse
  • Rep. Daniel Meuser
  • Rep. Daniel Webster
  • Rep. Darrell Issa
  • Rep. Darin LaHood
  • Rep. Dave Joyce
  • Rep. David Kustoff
  • Rep. David Rouzer
  • Rep. David Schweikert
  • Rep. David Valadao
  • Rep. Debbie Lesko
  • Rep. Devin Nunes
  • Rep. Diana Harshbarger
  • Rep. Doug LaMalfa
  • Rep. Doug Lamborn
  • Rep. Dusty Johnson
  • Rep. Elise Stefanik
  • Rep. Frank Lucas
  • Rep. Fred Keller
  • Rep. French Hill
  • Rep. Garret Graves
  • Rep. Gary Palmer
  • Rep. Glenn Grothman
  • Rep. Glenn Thompson
  • Rep. Greg Murphy
  • Rep. Greg Pence
  • Rep. Greg Steube
  • Rep. Gus Bilirakis
  • Rep. Guy Reschenthaler
  • Rep. Harold Rogers
  • Rep. Jack Bergman
  • Rep. Jake Ellzey
  • Rep. Jake LaTurner
  • Rep. James Baird
  • Rep. James Comer
  • Rep. Jason Smith
  • Rep. Jay Obernolte
  • Rep. Jeffrey Duncan
  • Rep. Jerry Carl
  • Rep. Jim Banks
  • Rep. Jim Jordan
  • Rep. Jodey Arrington
  • Rep. Joe Wilson
  • Rep. John Curtis
  • Rep. John Joyce
  • Rep. John Moolenaar
  • Rep. John Rose
  • Rep. John Rutherford
  • Rep. Julia Letlow
  • Rep. Kat Cammack
  • Rep. Kay Granger
  • Rep. Kelly Armstrong
  • Rep. Ken Buck
  • Rep. Ken Calvert
  • Rep. Kevin Hern
  • Rep. Kevin McCarthy
  • Rep. Lance Gooden
  • Rep. Larry Bucshon
  • Rep. Lauren Boebert
  • Rep. Lee Zeldin
  • Rep. Lisa McClain
  • Rep. Lloyd Smucker
  • Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks
  • Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart
  • Rep. Marjorie Greene
  • Rep. Mark Amodei
  • Rep. Mark Green
  • Rep. Markwayne Mullin
  • Rep. Mary Miller
  • Rep. Matt Rosendale
  • Rep. Michael Burgess
  • Rep. Michael Cloud
  • Rep. Michael Guest
  • Rep. Michael McCaul
  • Rep. Michael Turner
  • Rep. Michael Waltz
  • Rep. Michelle Fischbach
  • Rep. Michelle Steel
  • Rep. Mike Bost
  • Rep. Mike Carey
  • Rep. Mike Gallagher
  • Rep. Mike Garcia
  • Rep. Mike Johnson
  • Rep. Mike Kelly
  • Rep. Mike Rogers
  • Rep. Mike Simpson
  • Rep. Morgan Griffith
  • Rep. Neal Dunn
  • Rep. Pat Fallon
  • Rep. Patrick McHenry
  • Rep. Paul Gosar
  • Rep. Pete Sessions
  • Rep. Pete Stauber
  • Rep. Ralph Norman
  • Rep. Randy Feenstra
  • Rep. Randy Weber
  • Rep. Richard Hudson
  • Rep. Rick Allen
  • Rep. Rick Crawford
  • Rep. Robert Aderholt
  • Rep. Robert Good
  • Rep. Robert Latta
  • Rep. Robert Wittman
  • Rep. Roger Williams
  • Rep. Ron Estes
  • Rep. Ronny Jackson
  • Rep. Russ Fulcher
  • Rep. Sam Graves
  • Rep. Scott DesJarlais
  • Rep. Scott Fitzgerald
  • Rep. Scott Franklin
  • Rep. Scott Perry
  • Rep. Stephanie Bice
  • Rep. Steve Scalise
  • Rep. Steve Womack
  • Rep. Steven Chabot
  • Rep. Ted Budd
  • Rep. Thomas Massie
  • Rep. Tim Burchett
  • Rep. Tim Walberg
  • Rep. Tom Cole
  • Rep. Tom Emmer
  • Rep. Tom McClintock
  • Rep. Tom Tiffany
  • Rep. Tony Gonzales
  • Rep. Tracey Mann
  • Rep. Trent Kelly
  • Rep. Troy Balderson
  • Rep. Troy Nehls
  • Rep. Vern Buchanan
  • Rep. Victoria Spartz
  • Rep. Virginia Foxx
  • Rep. Warren Davidson
  • Rep. William Timmons
  • Rep. Yvette Herrell

For more information on how these issues impact the election check out the latest research and analysis from AEA’s team of policy experts.