Promises Made, Promises Kept: Biden’s Illegal Attack On American Energy

When someone tells you who they are believe them the first time.


In over 400 days of the Biden administration, President Biden has not held any legally mandated oil and gas onshore lease sales on Federal lands, and the only single offshore lease sale was invalidated by a federal judge, claiming that the sale did not appropriately consider climate change. The Biden administration has yet to challenge that court decision. Further, the Interior Department just announced it will not move forward with planned oil and gas lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico and Alaska’s Cook Inlet. According to the department, the Cook Inlet lease sale would not proceed due to insufficient industry interest and the planned sale of two leases, lease 259 and lease 261, in the Gulf of Mexico will not proceed due to contradictory court rulings on the leases. The Alaska lease would have covered more than 1 million acres that would provide oil for 40 or more years of production. These cancellations come when the national average price of regular gas hit an all-time high of $4.418 a gallon, according to AAA, and Americans are suffering under high inflation with the CPI increasing almost 15 percent since Biden took office.

Background

Under federal law, the Interior Department is required to adhere to a five-year offshore leasing plan, which was set to end at the end of June in the case of the affected leases. In January 2021, President Biden signed an executive order freezing all new oil and gas leasing on federal lands. Last summer, a judge struck down the ruling, prompting the Biden administration to appeal. (See below.) An offshore lease sale in the Gulf of Mexico was held on November 17, setting a record, but it was invalidated by a judge in January. Shell, BP, Chevron and Exxon Mobil offered $192 million for the rights to drill in the Gulf. Biden has not appealed that decision.

Are Biden’s Decisions Legal? 

A federal attorney is arguing that President Biden legally called for suspending new oil and gas lease sales while considering their effect on climate change. Department of Justice attorney Andrew B. Bernie told a 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel, the current offshore lease sale plan states specifically that the U.S. Secretary of the Interior “may reduce or cancel lease offerings on account of climate change.” He claimed that land-based sales “were not postponed by the executive order. They were postponed because of a need to comply with NEPA”—the National Environmental Policy Act.

Arguing for the 13 states that challenged Biden’s January 2021 order (Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and West Virginia), Louisiana Deputy Solicitor General Joseph Scott St. John said laws passed in response to the 1970s oil crisis require lease sales and that the Biden administration failed to give a valid reason for postponing or canceling them. The state challenge to Biden’s order has not yet gone to trial but a federal judge blocked the order in a preliminary injunction, writing that since the laws did not state the president could suspend oil lease sales, only Congress could do so.

Onshore Lease Sales Scheduled by Its 5-Year Plan

Four onshore lease sales are so far scheduled next month—for land in Nevada on June 14; New Mexico, Oklahoma and Colorado on June 16; Wyoming on June 22 and Utah, Montana and North Dakota on June 28. However, the administration radically scaled back the amount of land originally on offer and raised royalty rates 50 percent from 12.5 percent to 18.75 percent, which is the amount usually charged for desirable deep water offshore leases. Leases less than 656 feet (200 meters) of water are charged the 12.5 percent minimum.

Conclusion

Biden has come under pressure to increase U.S. crude production as fuel prices spike because of his policies against oil and gas and the energy ramification of Russian sanctions due to its invasion of Ukraine. Oil companies have been reluctant to ramp up production due to Biden’s anti-oil and gas policies and because of difficulties getting workers, increased cost of supplies, difficulty in getting loans for new drilling investments and the uncertainty of whether today’s high prices will continue and for how long.

Biden is following along with his anti-oil and gas policies and his promise to not allow any new leasing, canceling the three offshore sales in the Gulf and off Alaska. These cancellations are another example of the administration’s opposition to oil and gas development in the United States. Biden speaks about the need for additional oil supplies, but his administration deliberately takes actions to stop more energy. The Biden administration tells the public of the need for more supply but acts to restrict it at almost every turn. As global energy prices continue to rise and as Americans are faced with soaring gasoline and diesel prices along with higher natural gas prices, the Biden administration needs to change its anti-oil and gas policies to provide certainty for the industry and to immediately act on a new five-year program for federal offshore leasing. Otherwise, Americans can expect energy prices and the CPI to continue to increase rapidly

West Virginia Senator Manchin is skeptical that Biden’s Interior Department plans to ever propose a new five-year leasing program this summer, as required by Congress. Manchin noted that he is looking for security for our nation and reliability for the energy we need for our nation, and the administration seems to be going the other way.


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

Key Vote NO on H.R. 7688

The American Energy Alliance urges all members to oppose H.R. 7688, the Consumer Fuel Price Gouging Prevention Act. This legislation claims to address an imaginary problem by giving the President of the United States unilateral power to set prices and harass small businesses based on a vague idea of “unconscionably excessive” gas prices.

While there are many factors that affect gas prices, most especially the price and supply of crude oil, so-called price gouging is not one of them. Over 90% of gas stations in the United States are independently owned. These small businesses set prices individually, they are not directed or controlled by whatever oil company’s brand they have on their sign. This legislation would target these small business for investigation and harassment, while ignoring real factors that affect gas prices, like regulation and administration policy actions to prevent domestic oil production.

For decades now the Federal Trade Commission has repeatedly searched for evidence of “price gouging” or collusion in price setting in the gasoline market. No evidence has ever been found. It is an imaginary problem, a false talking point used to deflect attention.

Both the supposed target of this legislation and the sweeping, unchecked power it would grant the president, are misguided. The AEA urges all members to support free markets and affordable energy by voting NO on H.R. 7688. AEA will include this vote in its American Energy Scorecard.

American Energy Alliance Strongly Opposes Consumer Fuel Price Gouging Prevention Act

WASHINGTON D.C. (May 19, 2022) This week, Democrats in the House of Representatives will try to misdirect voters about the source of high energy prices. Rather than taking on the policies of the Biden administration, which are the actual cause of more expensive energy, the House will take up legislation about a phantom cause: “price gouging.” The bill, H.R. 7688, is named the “Consumer Fuel Price Gouging Prevention Act,” and it would give the President vast powers to set price controls by executive fiat. If passed, this legislation will cause even more harm to American energy consumers. Price controls don’t work, and our experience during the gas lines of the 1970s should remind us that price controls will lead to shortages.

Thomas Pyle, President of the American Energy Alliance, issued the following statement:

“This legislation is a cynical attempt to deflect blame. The Biden administration, supported and encouraged by Democrats in Congress, has taken repeated action to suppress and prevent domestic oil and gas production. Now, these chickens are coming home to roost, as American families face rising energy prices and prices at the pump. These prices are a direct result of the Biden administration’s war on domestic energy production.

Instead of challenging the president on the policy actions, he’s taken to cause higher energy prices, Democrats in Congress are now pretending that energy inflation is being caused by supposed price gouging. This is asserted without evidence because there is no evidence. Over 90 percent of gas stations in America are independently owned. They set their prices individually based on market factors that reflect supply and demand. Pretending that these tens of thousands of small businesses are somehow coordinating to raise gas prices is preposterous, and unsurprisingly despite 20 years of investigating the Federal Trade Commission has never found any evidence of price gouging or coordinated price setting.

Democrats in Congress know all this, but there are elections this November and they are looking for someone else to blame for the energy inflation that they have caused. They should be ashamed of trying to blame hard-pressed small businesses for their own errors. This legislation is not serious governing, it is cynical politics, and Americans will see right through it.”

Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

Biden Caused Higher Energy Prices, Congress Hopes You Won’t Notice

This week, Democrats in the House of Representatives will try to misdirect voters about the source of high energy prices. Rather than taking on the policies of the Biden administration which are the actual cause of more expensive energy, the House will take up legislation about a phantom cause: “price gouging.” The bill, H.R. 7688, is named the “Consumer Fuel Price Gouging Prevention Act,” and it would give the President vast powers to set price controls to combat this imaginary crisis of price gouging that is alleged to be sweeping the nation. The legislation is transparent politics, with politicians hoping to save themselves in the November elections, even though they have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with President Biden in his crusade to shut off American energy and even green energy mineral development in the U.S. 

President Biden has been one of the worst presidents for America’s energy fortunes in history. From shutting down pipelines, to shutting down leasing, to illegally ignoring his duty to hold timely leases, to covering private enterprise with the green tape extreme environmental groups demand, he has done everything in his power to shut down, impede and destroy American jobs and energy. Now that his actions are showing up at the pump, he wants to blame someone else. This bill gives him a green light to do so. Apparently, the “Putin Price Hike” messaging isn’t working, so the administration is looking for a new scapegoat. But Americans know this administration has been shutting down domestic energy production. 

Beyond the imaginary premise of price gouging, the bill itself is dangerously ridiculous. It allows the president to declare an “Energy Emergency” and then sic DOJ investigators on anyone of whom they decide to target in their snipe hunt. The bill is full of terms like “unconscionable pricing,” and “unconscionably excessive,” which would never stand up in any court but make for nice press releases for those who want to distance themselves from the absurdly high energy prices they are in fact responsible for. 

The legislation would also allow President Biden to order the Federal Trade Commission into action in search of supposed unfair or deceptive practices, presumably as soon as they get finished looking into the “price gouging” for baby formula that President Biden claims is happening. But like high energy prices, the baby formula shortage it actually a government-created problem, since it was the FDA that shut down one of the largest formula makers in the country and federal command and control of the dairy industry that limits alternative producers. Apparently, President Biden’s answer to the baby formula shortage is the same as his answer to energy prices: allege price gouging and call for more imports.

Ultimately, though, this bill isn’t a price-gouging bill; it’s a price control bill. It’s an attempt to give the President the power to set the price of fuels. This bill is an attempt to blame oil companies for the Biden administration’s policies. Just this last week he canceled offshore lease sales in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico. He somehow thinks that voters will not notice the hypocrisy. 

Everyone should read this bill.  It’s pretty short and easy to understand. At the President’s total discretion, he can declare that the gasoline or diesel fuel price is unconscionably high and he thinks gas stations are exploiting an “energy emergency.” None of these terms are defined so they can mean whatever the President says they mean. And these price controls can be continued indefinitely.  Congress should be ashamed of itself for delegating this kind of unlimited power to the executive, to be used at his sole discretion. 

And this power is being handed to the President to combat an entirely fictitious issue. The Federal Trade Commission has studied price gouging for more than 20 years and they have failed repeatedly to find nefarious actions. Which should be no surprise. Despite the brand logos we see on gas stations, more than 90% of the gas stations in America are owned by independent owners. Each station determines its own pricing, it is not dictated by whatever large oil company might be named on the sign. If there were systematic efforts to gouge consumers or set prices, it would require a vast conspiracy of tens of thousands of participants. And the conspiracy would have long since been found out by now. 

The reality is that President Biden has taken action, and the actions he took drove up the price of fuel. He has illegally canceled lease sale after lease sale. He canceled the Keystone XL pipeline.  He has shut down oil leasing in Alaska. He has proposed additional taxes and additional regulations on oil producers. After all this, he claims he wants lower prices at the pump, but he is either lying, or he doesn’t know what his administration is up to. 

In fact, there are people in the Biden administration who want higher fuel prices, both to make electric vehicles look more competitive and to try to get people to use less oil (which they think is intrinsically bad). And those are the policies we are getting.  Both the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Transportation have repeatedly mentioned it in media interviews. High energy prices are not an accident, this has always been the plan.

If Congress wants to do something useful, they would pass a bill reversing everything energy action President Biden has taken. They could move to open up the baby formula factory the FDA closed at the same time. The “gouging” isn’t being done by your neighborhood gas station owner; Americans are being gouged by their government.

The Unregulated Podcast #83: The Senator from Europe

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast, Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna commemorate the service of outgoing White House Press Secretary Jen “Circle Back” Psaki, and discuss Senator Kevin Cramer’s (R-EU) efforts to implement a national energy tax in the United States to “catch-up” to Europe.

Links:

Senators Seek Higher Energy Prices

Is now the right time to increase energy prices with a new tax on energy?

Despite the fact that inflation is the highest it’s been in forty years and the U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of 2022, Republican Senators Kevin Cramer, Lindsey Graham, and Bill Cassidy apparently think so.  They’re plotting with Democrat Senators Joe Manchin, Chris Coons, and Sheldon Whitehouse (who’s never met an energy tax he didn’t like) to push for a new “carbon border adjustment”.

That’s bad news for household budgets.  This so-called “adjustment” is a tax on energy – like oil, gas, and coal – and imports, like fertilizer, steel, aluminum, and concrete.  It will drive up the cost of pretty much everything made or transported, including household goods, cars, and food.

The theory behind this tax is that we should make countries like China and India put strict limits on their emissions.  The reality is, people in the U.S. are going to pay in the end.

Senator Cramer’s argument for the new energy tax might be the most bizarre of all.  Here’s what he told E&E News:  “To me, one of the bigger challenges is that Europe is so far out in front on the whole concept.  And it’s hard to tell them to slow down, but at the same time, I’d like to reconcile with them first, and then I think we all move forward better.” 

Has Senator Cramer looked at Europe’s energy situation recently?  Half the continent is hoping Russia doesn’t cut off its oil and gas after years patting themselves on the back for switching to wind and solar.  Following a Europe First strategy is the worst possible approach for America.

A better strategy would be to liberate American industry from the jumble of regulations and restrictions that drive up costs here at home.  Increased energy production at home is a win for the economy and the environment.

They can call it what they want, but the carbon border adjustment is still a tax on energy.  It will eat into the wallets of all Americans, especially the poor, the elderly, and local institutions like schools and hospitals.

Yes, the U.S. is the world’s biggest producer of oil, but we still bring in plenty of crude each year from abroad to supply our world-class refineries.  Taxing imports, especially oil imports, means the costs for these refineries goes up.  That means the costs for the rest of us go up on all of the critical petroleum products that power our economy.

Furthermore, knowing the history of Senator Whitehouse and Senator Coons, is there any chance they’ll stop there?  Absolutely not.  This plan is phase one for the Democrats in their larger agenda of appeasing Big Green, Inc.  Anyone who thinks this is about helping the U.S. economy or American consumers is deluded.

We know the Democrats’ end goal is to stop every one of us from using affordable oil, gas, and coal. They don’t care where it comes from and they don’t care about pushing us into energy poverty like the Europeans are now facing.  We expect better from Senators Cramer, Cassidy, and Graham.

When President Carter presided over the destruction of our economy in the 1970s he tried to blame stagflation on the Arab oil embargo.  Similarly, President Biden is trying to blame Putin for his runaway inflation.

If the Republicans help impose an energy tax on top of the mess we are already in, they will have no one to blame but themselves.

The Unregulated Podcast #82: Jamie Dimon Sees the Light

On this episode of the Unregulated Podcast, Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna discuss the latest headlines out of Washington.

Links:

Key Votes: Motions to Instruct

The American Energy Alliance urges all Senators to support the following motions to instruct conferees to the H.R. 4521 conference committee.

YES on Barrasso motion requiring the development of a new offshore leasing plan. The administration has taken no action to begin a new five-year leasing plan as required by law.

YES on Lee motion to discard extraneous green provisions passed by the House. These provisions are not relevant to a China competition bill and should not have been included.

YES on Sullivan motion to prevent taxpayer dollars from subsidizing products from China or Russia. China competition legislation should not subsidize Chinese products.

YES on Daines motion to prevent provisions that would undermine US energy production. A strong domestic energy industry is an indispensable element of the US successfully competing with China.

YES on Capito motion to clarify the President’s emergency declarations authority. Efforts to invoke “emergency” authorities to harm domestic energy producers would undermine the US competitive position versus China.

YES on Scott (SC) motion to prevent new greenhouse gas mandates in the US unless equaled by China. Imposing harmful measures on American firms without reciprocal Chinese actions would undermine US competition with China.

The AEA urges all members to support free markets and affordable energy by voting YES on these six motions to instruct conferees.  

Should votes on these motions occur, AEA will include them in its American Energy Scorecard.

The Unregulated Podcast #81: Semper Fidelis

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast, Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna discuss the latest headlines in Washington.

Links:

The Unregulated Podcast #80: Special K Strikes Again

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna discuss the latest adventures and follies of “Special” Envoy John Kerry.