AEA Survey Makes Clear: Voters Don’t Want to Pay for Biden’s Global Warming Agenda

It is time for the Biden team to give up on their dreams of making energy more expensive and limiting consumer choice with respect to cars and trucks.


WASHINGTON DC (April 28, 2021) – As the Biden Administration attempts to make good on all of its recent proclamations with respect to global warming and renewable energy, the American Energy Alliance today released the results of a nationwide survey conducted in February of 1,000 voters (3.1% margin of error). The topline results of the survey, conducted by MWR Strategies, are included here.

The results indicate that voters want and expect minimal federal involvement in the energy sector. This sentiment is driven partly by cost considerations, partly by lack of trust in the government’s competence or its intentions, and partly by a strong and durable belief in the efficacy of private sector action.

Specific response sets include:

  • Voters don’t want to pay to either address climate change or increase the use of renewable energy. There continues to be limited appetite to pay to address climate change. When asked what they would be willing to pay each year to address climate change, the median response from voters was 20 dollars. That is very similar to answers we have received to this question over the last few years, which suggests that climate change – despite the rhetoric – has stalled as an issue for most Americans.

In this survey, we also asked about voters’ willingness to pay to increase our use of the renewable to 100% by 2035. The median response was 10 dollars.

  • Carbon tax? No, thank you. When asked whether the federal government should impose a tax on carbon dioxide emissions, 62% of respondents said no.

Voters don’t want government to raise taxes on energy (58% oppose). Voters are clear-eyed that energy is a good thing that should not be made more expensive (75% agree).

  • Don’t ban internal combustion engines. Voters emphatically don’t want government to make it illegal to sell gasoline-powered cars (75% oppose). Similarly, 80% do not think the federal government should mandate what kinds of cars people can buy.
  • Climate change remains a low priority. As has been the case across a number of years, climate change is not a particularly salient issue. Just 13 respondents (1.3%) identified it as the most pressing issue facing the United States, and just 25 more (2.5%) identified it as the second most pressing issue facing the United States.

Similarly, when asked separately to characterize climate change, 50% of respondents indicated it is either not a problem, a minor problem, or a moderate problem. Less than a quarter (24%) indicated it was a crisis.

Thomas Pyle, President of the American Energy Alliance, issued the following statement:

“Voters have been clear that they don’t want to pay anything remotely near what the Biden Administration wants to charge them for government solutions to global warming that produce no meaningful results. Nor do voters want the federal government telling them what kinds of cars they should buy and drive. It is time for the Biden team to give up on their dreams of making energy more expensive and limiting consumer choice with respect to cars and trucks.”


The survey and results can be read here.


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

Key Vote NO on S. J. Res. 14

The American Energy Alliance urges all Senators to oppose S.J. Res. 14, the Congressional Review Act resolution on the 2020 methane rule from the EPA. The previous rules regarding methane were expensive and duplicative, the oil and gas industry already has ample financial and regulatory incentive to reduce methane emissions.

More significantly, passage of this resolution will introduce substantial uncertainty into the regulatory process. Despite the assertions of the resolution’s sponsors, this resolution does not automatically reintroduce the Obama-era methane regulations. The CRA states that a disapproved rule “may not be reissued in substantially the same form.” The 2020 methane rule from the Trump administration that is the subject of the resolution affirmed and built upon the previous methane regulations from 2012 and 2016. Additionally, litigation over those previous regulations is still ongoing, only having been held in abeyance by the 2020 rule. This CRA resolution would invalidate those parts of the 2012 and 2016 regulations that are included in the 2020 rule. The preexisting litigation over the 2012 and 2016 rules could prevent those older regulations from immediately going into effect. 

Thus this CRA resolution is not a neat return to the Obama administration rules, but rather sets up years of litigation and uncertainty. If the goal is reinstating the Obama era rules quickly, the CRA is the wrong tool.

The AEA urges all members to support free markets and affordable energy by voting NO on S.J. Res. 14.  AEA will include this vote in its American Energy Scorecard.

The Unregulated Podcast #33: Tom and Mike Discuss Biden’s Earth Day Summit

Tom and Mike discuss Biden’s Earth Day summit. Plus, Biden sets a target of reducing emissions by 50 percent, and Caitlyn Jenner announces her campaign for Governor of California.

Organizations Warn Congress: Watch Your Back, Sue-and-Settle Is in the Air


Behind Biden’s Earth Day announcements and Climate Summit are plans to circumvent legislative jurisdiction and sneak in transformational change. 


WASHINGTON DC (April 19, 2021) – Today, nineteen organizations issued letters to Members of Congress warning of an apparent Biden administration end-run around the legislature to impose the Green New Deal through a regulatory back door, as part of what would be the biggest “sue-and-settle” arrangement ever attempted. The letters were organized by the American Energy Alliance (AEA), the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization.

Pointing to email records obtained from state attorneys general (AGs) by Energy Policy Advocates, over the course of several months a plan was hatched to fundamentally transform the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) provision into an unrecognizable and never intended framework for economy wide decarbonization – something that has never been authorized by Congress.

The emails show that for two years state AGs and the now-acting head of EPA’s Air & Radiation Office responsible for these rulemakings plotted to litigate this agenda into place. What was then a desperate ploy has turned into “sue-and-settle” with the AGs as partners.

This complicated legal maneuvering away from the democratic process and into the regulatory shadows is driven by the considerable political risk of promoting this agenda openly, the organizations’ letters to House and Senate leaders reads. They also cite the politically catastrophic 2009 cap-and-trade legislation, and failed Green New Deal vote of 2020, as the reason behind extremists’ search for a more discreet, backdoor strategy to sneak a transformational agenda into law.

The letters arrive days before “Earth Day” and President Biden’s international summit on climate change which is expected to announce expensive, ineffective and impossible goals.

AEA President Thomas Pyle made the following statement:

“Affordable energy won at the ballot box, not climate change. We already know the outcomes of Biden’s failed green jobs programs and since extremists can’t trick Congress into pushing through the Green New Deal, they may attempt to go around them. This is their warning.

“The swamp has been refilled and this kind of secretive effort – only revealed via lawsuit – demonstrates the worst elements of Washington DC. Unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats are again cycling through the revolving door of government and special interest groups to circumvent the will of the people all in the name of greater government control.”

View the letter and list of signatories sent to House leaders.

View the letter and list of signatories sent to Senate leaders.


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #32: Tom and Mike discuss G-10 Staffers and Climate Conundrums

Tom and Mike discuss G-10 staffers and Covid/climate conundrums. Plus the GOP’s three-day climate event, the Clean Future Act, Bloomberg in China, and climate spending.

Links:

The Unregulated Podcast #31: Tom and Mike Discuss Rob Manfred’s All-Star Error

Tom and Mike sit down to discuss the MLB moving the All-Star Game out of Atlanta. Plus, everything is infrastructure, AOC’s take on the border crisis, and Biden makes another error on green jobs.

Links:

The Unregulated Podcast #30: Tom and Mike Discuss Biden’s First Press Conference and the Infrastructure Bill

Tom and Mike sit down to discuss President Biden’s first press conference and the infrastructure bill. They also discuss problems with the Jones Act and the future of the filibuster.

Ban North Face. Wait, Strike that. Reverse It.

Sometimes it feels impossible not to get frustrated during this pandemic. 

If you work in the American oil and gas industry and went from a president who is an energy hero to one that’s an energy zero, those times are increasing in frequency. 

According to the 5th annual Global Energy Talent Index (GETI) report, 78 percent of oil and gas employees feel less secure in their jobs than they did a year ago.  Gee, I wonder why.

But ask many of them, knowing what they know now, would they still enter the oil and gas industry for a career if they all had to do it all over again and the answer is a resounding yes. 

So, they feel insecure about their industry but love what they do for a living, even among these challenging times, what are their concerns or frustrations?  

An informal survey of oil and gas industry employees we at AEA conducted points to hypocrisy among the climate elite as one of the most frustrating issues of all. 

Put aside the open hostility of President Biden’s executive orders, they say; it’s the aloof comments from people like White House climate czar John Kerry about the need for the U.S. to cut emissions and for oil and gas workers to get re-educated and relocate to build solar panel as he steps on to his private jet – which is built by and powered by oil – that seems to aggravate them the most.

And it isn’t just politicians, current or former, like Kerry, they find fault with when it comes to hypocrisy, or irony for that matter.  For years, the industry has highlighted environmental protesters who flip on their microphones and loudspeakers (powered by oil and gas), organize their rallies through mobile phone technology and social media (powered by oil and gas), and travel by the busload (powered by oil and gas) to challenge the very industry that got them there (literally.)

The blatant hypocrisy against oil and gas has gone corporate, too.  For years, companies like New Belgium, maker of delicious craft beers such as Fat Tire (at a minimum are delivered by oil and gas), or trendy clothing companies like Patagonia (literally made from petroleum products) have also taken a page from the John Kerry virtue signaling playbook.

North Face, an outdoor recreation clothing maker, delivered a high-profile rejection to Innovex, a Texas-based oilfield service company, when it denied the company the rights to put their logo on an order of four hundred North Face jackets—an employee gift Innovex planned on issuing.  Innovex CEO Steve Rendle fired back at North Face via LinkedIn.

One might think the industry would call for a universal ban of North Face, right?

Instead, one brilliant oil and gas company flipped the script and praised North Face, going so far as to issue them an award. 

Do tell, right?

Chris Wright, President and CEO of Liberty Oilfield, and outdoor enthusiast, took the time to dig through North Face’s online catalogue to discover every product the company sells includes nylon, polyester and polyurethane, all of which come from petroleum. That means North Face is a huge customer of the oil and gas industry, so Wright, along with the Colorado Oil and Gas Association (COGA), issued North Face an “Extraordinary Customer Award” via a safe, social-distanced press conference. Kudos to Shaun Boyd at CBS Denver, one of the largest television news outlets in Colorado, who covered the award and ceremony. 

But petroleum’s lack of appreciation doesn’t stop with the outdoor gear and recreation like North Face or Patagonia, or New Belgium.

The Institute for Energy Research joined Chris Wright and COGA to highlight the enormous contribution oil and gas has made in addressing the coronavirus pandemic. These miracle vaccines would not be possible without the huge contributions of America’s first-in-the-world supplies of oil and natural gas, which are the basis of organic chemistry which in turn makes plastics that are used in the production of vials, screening and protective gear, and thousands of other applications throughout the medical logistics chain.

Hospitals are loaded with protective equipment, syringes, tubing, polypropylene masks, gowns and goggles all made with hydrocarbons. And each item is aimed at helping protect our first responders and patients. Or think about the cooling and filtering of air to keep our doctors and nurses healthy, and to help patients heal. The power for our hospitals is also critical. Hydrocarbons provide 63 percent of electricity nationwide, including power for emergency rooms, urgent care centers, and pharmaceutical production facilities.  The two most common types of back-up generators used for hospitals are natural gas powered and diesel fueled combustion engines.  A full tank of diesel fuel can maintain power for an entire hospital for about 8 hours.  Depending on the size of the hospital and the amount of fuel stored on site, these types of generators can maintain power for at least 24 hours.  

Can you imagine if Pfizer and Moderna could not rely on that power?  Or, if they could not keep their vaccines stored at the necessary cold temperatures to ensure their effectiveness?

Our care providers and patients require ready and reliable access to power the life-saving machines supporting our most vulnerable, regardless of the weather conditions happening outside. 

Lastly, reliable access to affordable transportation is also critical. 95 percent of our transportation fuels – gasoline, diesel and jet fuel – transport all the personnel, component parts and eventually the vaccines themselves.

In short, we’re fortunate as a country to have access to these important fuels to support our life saving medical care and preventative opportunities. 

With their value higher than ever, you’d expect oil and gas workers to be celebrated. Instead, their facing all-time high contempt from the hypocritical climate elite. It’s a frustrating time indeed, but it’s refreshing to see someone like Chris Wright and COGA come in with a new take to a longstanding problem.

For more in depth information, consider listening — The Plugged In Podcast #72: Tom Pyle Speaks to the Colorado Oil and Gas Association.

A Tax on Carbon is a Tax On Everyone


Call it whatever you like, it’s still the most regressive tax imaginable.


WASHINGTON DC (March 26, 2021) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA), the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization, reiterated its opposition to a carbon tax – in any form – in reaction to the news that the American Petroleum Institute has endorsed a “price on carbon.”

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement:

“Let’s be clear. A price on carbon is a tax on energy. A national energy tax is an easy position for big, multi-national companies to embrace because it gives the federal government what it wants (more tax revenue); attempts to appease the greens (it won’t); and compels customers to pay more in taxes to the federal government in the false hope of avoiding additional future regulations (the progressives have already ruled this out).

“Those who are left out of the conversation are consumers, small businesses, the poor, seniors, and those on fixed incomes – basically everyone.

“I have been advocating for years that the House and Senate should debate and vote on a clean bill to create a federal carbon tax so that the American people can clearly see where their elected representatives stand on this issue. I look forward to a robust public discussion about how the Biden Administration, Congressional Democrats, and big business, including some integrated oil companies, are united in support of imposing the most regressive tax imaginable on American voters.”


Additional Resources:

For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #29 Tom and Mike Discuss the Early Days of the Biden Administration with Mandy Gunasekara

Tom and Mike discuss the early days of the Biden administration with guest Mandy Gunasekara, the 13 states challenging Biden’s oil leasing ban, and Dana Carvey’s Biden and Fauci impressions.

Links:

“He’s Kind Of A Tough Guy” – Dana Carvey On His Dr. Fauci Impression 

13 states challenge Biden oil leasing plan

Global Energy Inequality Goes Deeper Than Bitcoin 

An SUV packed with 25 people at the border. A horrible crash, an unthinkable toll

Biden clip 1

Biden clip 2