Top 10 Questions for EPA Nominee Michael Regan


How will Biden’s EPA administrator find consensus amid
White House climate czars and Big Green, Inc.?


WASHINGTON DC (February 2, 2020) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) issued ten questions for tomorrow’s Senate Environment and Public Works Committee confirmation hearing of Michael S. Regan. AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement ahead of the hearing:

“As a state regulator, Michael Regan has real-world experience balancing environmental protection and economic growth. He has approved projects like the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and could be an effective contributor to America’s energy and environmental success story. However, he will have non-confirmed White House climate czars like Gina McCarthy and John Kerry to contend with. Time and time again, these individuals have shown their disdain for the natural gas, oil, and coal industries and have expressed no interest in compromise.

“It’s quite the conundrum Regan finds himself in – much of his resume focuses on working with energy producers, not seeking to put them out of business. Mr. Regan will be in a position where he can push back against unlawful regulations that unnecessarily, but intentionally drive up the price of energy on businesses and average Americans, but will the White House czars override him?”


Suggested questions from the American Energy Alliance:

  1. In 2018, under your leadership at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), you approved a key permit for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline declaring “no stone [was] unturned in the exhaustive eight-month review” and that DEQ’s “efforts have resulted in a carefully crafted permit that includes increased environmental protections, while giving us the tools we need to continue close oversight of this project as it moves forward.”

On his first day in office, to appease extreme environmentalists, President Biden used his executive power to revoke a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline, which had been carefully reviewed for more than ten years. Would you have recommended that President Biden revoke the Keystone permit? How would you use your experience to restore integrity to the pipeline review process?

  1. If Keystone XL was denied on the basis of a negative impact to climate, where do you stand on the importation of solar panels and windmill components or rare earth minerals from China, a major world polluter? Under the Biden administration’s rationale, shouldn’t imports from China be halted just like crude oil from Canada?

3.The Biden administration appears fond of the term environmental justice. In your own words, could you please define what environmental justice means? Could the term be misused, abused, or altered to achieve a premeditated outcome?

  1. On a scale of one to ten, how would you rate the importance of keeping energy affordable, especially for lower-income citizens or those living on a fixed income?

If the Biden Administration’s climate proposals caused gasoline or utility prices to rise significantly, disproportionately hurting this demographic financially, would you advise the President to change course?

  1. The promise of green jobs is not new. On February 17, 2009 – less than one month into his first term, President Barack Obama signed a $787 Billion stimulus package into law and promised 5 million green jobs. In 2012, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) issued four reports admonishing his green jobs program.
    The findings exposed some very low standards and targets, and even those were not met.
    • For instance, half of the training programs provided five or fewer days of training. Hardly a robust training for a full career.
    • Over twenty percent of the “degrees” and certificates went to people with only one day of training.
    • Job placement met only 10 percent of the targeted level and a much smaller fraction remained employed for at least six months.
    • At a June 6, 2012 hearing of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Chairman Darrell Issa forced the acting commission of the BLS to confirm that a list of jobs with dubious titles counted as green.
    • Even including these ludicrous versions of “green,” the new green-job creation never came close to the 5 million promised in February 2009.
    Back then it was all about a clean energy-economy and green jobs. Fast forward to today, and the discussion is centered around climate justice. With Mr. Biden in the White House again, why will this round of green jobs be any more successful?
  2. Is the EPA concerned with the rise of electric vehicle battery fires? Do homes or businesses with charging stations for EVs present a higher fire risk? Similar to flood insurance for a homeowner who willing buys or builds a home in a known flood plain, would you support an increase in insurance for homeowners or businesses with charging stations to mitigate environmental damage from such fires?
  3. The EPA recently released a briefing paper on renewable energy waste management exposing the vast waste produced once solar panels, lithium-ion batteries and windmills reach the end of their useful life. If the Biden Administration dramatically increases its use of these technologies, what will your plan be for adequate recycling and disposal? Do you believe that certain locations, regions or states will become recipients of this waste similar to Yucca Mountain’s nuclear waste repository?
  4. The former EPA Administrator under President Obama, Gina McCarthy, now sits in a non-confirmed position at the White House. Will you be reporting to Ms. McCarthy, or will she be reporting to you?
  5. Prior to this position, Ms. McCarthy was the President & CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) which has sued the previous administration more than 100 times. Do you believe Ms. McCarthy should recuse herself from any policy or legal topics that the NRDC has sued the U.S. Government on? Why or why not?
  6. According to publicly available tax records, your previous employer, the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), between the years 2008-16 received approximately 115 grants totaling more than $62 million from various foundations. These foundations have been charged with influencing public policy to intentionally stop the use of fossil fuels. Given your background and connection to EDF, how do you intend to remain impartial, fair and objective? Will you recuse yourself on any matters connected to EDF or these foundations?


Michal Regan’s confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin at 2:00pm EST on February 3, 2021 in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
PRESS@ENERGYDC.ORG

AEA to GM: Best of Luck


Since taxpayers should not be responsible for the automaker’s corporate goals, AEA invites GM’s support in eliminating government subsidies and mandates for EVs.


WASHINGTON DC (January 29, 2021) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following statement in response to yesterday’s announcement by GM, the nation’s largest automobile manufacturer, that it aspired to convert all of its light-duty vehicle sales to come from electric vehicles by 2035:

“GM’s announcement makes it clear that the company sees consumer preference for electric vehicles as inevitable, and they are sending a strong message to their shareholders, institutional investors, competitors, consumers, and the government, that subsidies and mandates for electric vehicles and bans on competing products like gasoline-powered vehicles are unnecessary, unwelcome, and counterproductive to their efforts.

“GM is a publicly traded business and is making a strategic, calculated market decision. In no way should any taxpayer be responsible for GM’s ability to achieve – or fail to achieve – their corporate goal of an all-electric light duty fleet by 2035.

“We look forward to working with GM to get the government out of the automobile manufacturing business and empower consumers – rather than bureaucrats – to decide what kind of cars they want to buy, own, and drive. We wish GM the best of luck.”


It is worth noting that GM has also indicated that it expects to rely on the private market to invest in carbon credits or offsets to meet some of their aspirational goals. The company stated that it “will assess credit and offset solutions in the coming years as the most efficient, equitable and inclusive ideas mature.”


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
PRESS@ENERGYDC.ORG

The Unregulated Podcast #21 Tom and Mike Discuss Biden’s Energy Plan With a Special Guest

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike are joined by The Honorable Dan Simmons, former head of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, to discuss Joe Biden’s first moves on energy. They also get in their Super Bowl predictions and give insight into a busy news week.

Links:

• The Day Europe’s Power Grid Came Close to a Massive Blackout

• Biden Suspends New Leases for Oil and Gas Drilling on Federal Lands

• Department of Energy Announces New Senior Leaders

• Biden’s Energy Nominee Divvied Millions In Taxpayer Funds To Alternative Energy Startups That Went Bankrupt

• Schumer calls for Biden to declare climate emergency

• President Biden: “Unity requires you to eliminate the vitriol.”

• Amazon Seeks to Postpone Alabama Unionization Vote

• California Governor Gavin Newsom lifts virus stay-at-home orders

• Pro-abortion protesters storm pro-life Mass in Ohio cathedral, demand free abortions

• Oil-producing Native American tribe seeks exemption from Biden drilling pause

• SCHUMER: “Senators will have to decide if Donald John Trump incited the erection.”

• Bill McKibben Twitter rant

Biden’s “Climate Day” Will Live in Infamy


President makes it clear that he cares more about environmentalists in California than workers in New Mexico, North Dakota, and Colorado, or families, the poor, the elderly, or those on fixed incomes anywhere in the United States.


WASHINGTON DC (January 27, 2021) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following response to President Biden’s executive orders directing the entire federal government to prioritize climate change above all priorities – including its own citizens.

“President Biden’s ban on oil and natural gas production on lands owned by all Americans will result in higher energy prices, job losses, and reduced economic growth.

“American lands and waters under federal stewardship contribute approximately 22 percent of our oil, 12 percent of our natural gas, and 40 percent of our coal. Taking that production offline will cost consumers, workers, and families money and will increase our reliance on unfriendly nations for our energy.

“Even worse, these actions are pointless. They will do nothing to affect climate change as competitors like China continue to ramp up the production and purchase of every form of energy they can, as fast as they can.

“President Biden should focus his own energies on Americans and the American economy. If he were serious about justice and equality, his emphasis would be on encouraging energy sources that can deliver affordable energy to every one of every income level.

“Less American energy means higher prices for motorists, businesses, families and disproportionally harms Americans who earn less or live on fixed incomes.”


Additional Resources:



For media inquiries please contact:
PRESS@ENERGYDC.ORG

AEA’s Top Ten Questions for Jennifer Granholm


Biden’s DOE nominee must answer for past funding failures including millions to a convicted felon, and cite what authority she would have to drive up the price of energy.


WASHINGTON DC (January 26, 2020) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) issued its top ten questions for tomorrow’s Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee confirmation hearing for former Michigan governor and attorney general, Jennifer Granholm. Granholm has been nominated by President Joe Biden as the next Secretary of the Department of Energy.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement ahead of the hearing:

“Senators on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee must make Jennifer Granholm answer for her record of funding and advocating failed green-energy companies, including handing millions of dollars to a felon convicted of embezzlement. As Governor, these failures were limited to unfortunate Michigan taxpayers. If she were to be confirmed to run the Department of Energy, she would take her failures national, impacting all of us. Only in Washington, it seems, you can fail your audition so miserably and still get a promotion.

“Jennifer Granholm is simply the wrong person to run the Department of Energy. Her record of failures in the State of Michigan is evidence enough that she is a bad manager. On top of that, she clearly has no interest in reducing the cost of energy and making the economy more efficient and competitive, or improving energy security – two central tenants in DOE’s mission.”

  1. The Michigan Economic Growth Authority (MEGA), for which you approved billions of dollars in tax credits for 434 projects, only proved to be successful in 2.3 percent of projects in meeting job creation goals.
    • What have you learned from this failure?
  2. Furthermore, your track record of picking winners and losers in the energy industry is tainted by the fact that, under your leadership, the Michigan Economic Growth Authority awarded a $9.1 million deal to a man who was on parole for embezzlement.
    • Would you care to explain how it is that you came to share a stage with Richard Short? • What was it about his company, Renewable and Sustainable Cos., that was so compelling that your administration was prepared to subsidize his business?
  3. Some of the battery companies you promoted and funded such as A123, LG Chem, and others, built their business model off the false notion that ten years ago, electric vehicles (EVs) would be ready for mass adoption by the public. The result? Consumers found EVs were not a cost-effective means of transportation and these companies struggled. In 2019, the last year before vehicle sales were skewed by the COVID pandemic, EV sales actually fell compared to 2018 in the U.S. and globally.
    • Why do you promote the use of government subsidies for EVs over trusting the American people to make good car choices themselves?
  4. According to E&E News, a well-known source for federal energy issues, the new chief of staff at DOE, Tarak Shah, recently sent an email to DOE staff stating, “We will develop and deploy technologies to tackle the climate crisis and build an equitable clean energy future” and that to achieve these clean energy goals, DOE must reorganize.
    •Can you point to the statute where these “clean energy goals” your potential chief of staff is referring to?
  5. In a recent opinion you authored in The Detroit News, you noted that “Kellogg’s, General Mills, Schneider Electric and Nestle agree that a low-carbon recovery is the best choice for Michigan.” You continued, “Michigan-based companies like Ford, General Motors and Whirlpool are also doing their part in setting bold targets to address climate change. ”You then advocated, along with these companies, that current governor, Gretchen Whitmer, must “enact statewide climate mitigation strategies and invest in clean energy infrastructure.
    • If these companies are already committed to CO2 reduction strategies, why do they need the current governor to subsidize them?
    • In the same opinion piece, you stated “the private sector needs greater support and political will from our policymakers to help us fully realize the potential of a zero-carbon future.”
    • Why does the private sector need more subsidies from the American taxpayer if “the economics are clear” as you also said?
    • Additionally, when you say that the “economics are clear” in the context of needing to give the private sector “greater support and political will from our policymakers” are you saying that the economics of a low carbon economy are bad for American taxpayers?
  6. President Biden recently signed an Executive Order (EO) calling on you, if confirmed, to review two rules specifically on energy building codes.
    • If confirmed, do you plan to force states to impose stricter building codes?
  7. The Obama administration, with Mr. Biden as its vice president, set a goal to “reduce carbon pollution by at least 3 billion metric tons cumulatively by 2030” through “efficiency standards for appliances and federal buildings.” The appliance standards program is governed by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
    • Where in the statute that controls appliance standards does the world “carbon” appear?
  8. Similarly, part of DOE’s mission is to work on “Reducing the cost of energy and making the economy more efficient and competitive.”
    • What steps will you take to reduce the cost of coal-fired electricity?
    • What steps will you take to reduce the cost of natural gas-fired electricity?
    • What will you do to reduce the cost of gasoline?
  9. One unifying thread of DOE’s work on energy is to improve U.S. energy security. On Day One, President Biden may have illegally revoked a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline The EO stated, that the “significance of the proposed pipeline for our energy security and economy is limited.”
    • Do you believe that 42,100 jobs, and possibly millions connected to it in one shape or another, is not significant?
  10. Furthermore, the EO canceling Keystone states, “approval of the proposed pipeline would undermine U.S. climate leadership by undercutting the credibility and influence of the United States in urging other countries to take ambitious climate action.” It also states, the “United States must prioritize the development of a clean energy economy, which will, in turn, create good jobs.”

The Department of Labor has issued four reports on the failed Green Jobs Program of 2009.
-The findings exposed very low standards and targets, and even those were not met.
-Half of the training programs provided five or fewer days of training. Over twenty percent of the “degrees” and certificates went to people with only one day of training.
-Job placement met only ten percent of the targeted level and a much smaller fraction remained employed for at least six months.
-The largest green-jobs category was “janitors and cleaners, except maids and housekeeping cleaners.”
-The septic tank and portable toilet servicing industry had 33 times as many “green” jobs as did solar electricity utilities.
-At a June 6, 2012 hearing of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Chairman Darrell Issa forced the acting commission of the BLS to confirm that a list of jobs with dubious greenness counted as green.
• Can you explain how the Biden Administration’s “Green Jobs Part 2” will be successful this time around?


Gov. Granholm’s Senate confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin at 9:30am EST on January 27, 2021. The hearing will be webcast live on the committee’s website, and an archived video will be available shortly after the hearing is complete.


For media inquiries please contact:
PRESS@ENERGYDC.ORG

The Unregulated Podcast #20 Tom and Mike Discuss Biden’s First Week of Executive Actions

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike discuss the wide ranging impacts of Joe Biden’s day one executive orders and how his administration is shaping up in regards to energy policy.

Links:

• Major Oil Producers Insulated from Biden’s Leasing Ban

• Trump couldn’t have incited sedition without the help of Fox News

• Tom Tweets

• Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis

• Pompeo Officially Deems China Guilty of Genocide

Interior Takes First Step Towards Biden’s Fracking Ban


A moratorium is just a ban by another name.


WASHINGTON DC (January 22, 2020) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following statement in response to the announcement that the Department of the Interior would place a 60-day moratorium on oil, natural gas and coal development on America’s federal lands. The freeze will apply to permits, leases, easements and federal land management plans.

“Many questioned then candidate-Biden’s extremity and couched him as ‘reasonable,’ even allowing him to walk back his statements about bans on fracking or generalizing them as restrictions, but not bans. What more do you need? Biden is two-for-two after day two of his new administration and their war against affordable, American-made energy that supports millions of workers and even more families.

“Despite him literally saying he’d do it, many doubted how aggressive President Biden would be on stopping America’s energy production. Here’s your proof. Sixty days will only be the beginning. A moratorium is simply a ban by another name.”


A federal ban on drilling would hamper oil and gas production across much of New Mexico, North Dakota and Wyoming—three of the nation’s largest oil and gas producing states, as well as offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, which produces 2.3 million barrels of oil and gas per day. For perspective, the U.S. owns 2.46 billion acres of subsurface mineral estate between its onshore and offshore public lands, which is larger than the entire landmass of the United States. All of this will be off limits in President Biden’s latest effort to stop American energy development.


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
PRESS@ENERGYDC.ORG

The Unregulated Podcast #19 Tom and Mike discuss impeachment and politics in New York

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike discuss Trump’s second impeachment, Andrew Yang, and politics in New York.

Links:

On Day One, Biden Sets American Economy, Energy Security Back Decades


New commander-in-chief calls for unity then gives American energy workers and families the shaft.


WASHINGTON DC (January 20, 2020) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following statement in response to President Joe Biden’s decision to rescind the permit for the Keystone pipeline, reenter the U.S. into the Paris Agreement, and order his agencies to immediately begin to unravel President Trump’s pro-consumer regulatory reforms.

“My mother taught me to judge people by their actions, not their words. Today, President Biden read a nice speech calling for unity then immediately signed a flurry of executive actions that thumbed his nose at half of the country and squarely took aim at affordable energy, the families that benefit from it, and the American workers who produce it.

“The Keystone pipeline is nearly completely built and an important link for North America’s economic security. The decision today to rescind the permit makes it crystal clear that Mr. Biden stands with the extreme green lobby and not average Americans.

“The Paris Agreement is fool’s errand. Nearly every signatory to the agreement is falling short of their commitment and even if they were on track, it would do virtually nothing to change our climate. The economic inactivity as a result of the COVID lockdowns this past year is merely a fraction of what Paris would require of the U.S. Meanwhile, China will increase their emissions and continue to do what is in their strategically best interest. Even James Hansen, the godfather of climate alarmism, has called the Paris Accord a fraud.

“If Joe Biden truly seeks to unify our nation, he’s off to a terrible start.”


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
PRESS@ENERGYDC.ORG

Unregulated Podcast #18: Tom and Mike Unpack a Busy First Week for 2021

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike discuss the action packed first week of 2021. From the storming of the Capitol Hill, to the results of the Georgia senate election and the re-election of the RNC chief find out what it all means for 2021.

Links:

• For first time in 5 years, US gas mileage down, emissions up (USA Today)

• Mike’s latest columns