Top 10 Questions for DOI Nominee Deb Haaland

The confirmation hearing for Representative Deb Haaland, who has been nominated for the position of Secretary of the Interior, is scheduled for Tuesday, February 23. 

The Department of the Interior is responsible for vast tracts of federal public lands and is, resultantly, among the most important departments with respect to America’s energy future. Rep. Haaland has established positions that put her nomination at odds with the long-term viability of federal lands administered by Interior, which are critical to the production of affordable and reliable energy. Lawmakers should be prepared to raise the following questions as they consider her nomination:

  1. As one of the sponsors of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019, you have publicly stated your support for powering the U.S. economy with 100% renewable energy and for proposals like the Green New Deal.
  1. A recent cold snap in Texas exposed, among other problems, an over-reliance on intermittent renewable energy sources. Half of the wind turbines froze, causing wind’s share of electricity to plunge from 42% to 8%. As a result, power prices in the wholesale market spiked, and millions of Texans lost power and at least twenty-three have died.
    • What lessons do you draw from the crisis in Texas?
  1. The U.S. Treasury has estimated that the Production Tax Credit that funds wind power will cost taxpayers $40.12 billion from 2018 to 2027, making it the most expensive energy subsidy under current tax law. To date, wind only contributes about 7.3% of total U.S. utility-scale electricity generation according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA.)
    • Do you think this ratio of subsidy to wind generation is a fair return on investment for U.S. taxpayers? If so, why? If not, would you support ending subsidies for wind power generation?
  1. China controls the world’s supply chain for rare earth elements and strategic and critical minerals necessary for renewable energy like solar panels, windmills and batteries. In fact, the U.S. is nearly four times more dependent on them for minerals critical for these technologies than we ever were on the Middle East for oil imports.
    • Is this impending reliance on China something that concerns you?
    • How would you consider improving this situation as Secretary?
  1. The United States federal government maintains a government-to-government relationship with the 566 federally recognized Native American Indian tribes and Alaska Native entities. As a member of the Laguna Pueblo, you are of course well-versed on the role that the Department of the Interior has in facilitating and promoting tribal self-determination. You have, however, been a critic of oil and gas development that is important to the revenues of some tribes.
    • How would you respond to tribes like the Ute Indian Tribe in Utah that have developed the oil and gas on their tribal lands using hydraulic fracturing?
    • Would you seek to end the oil and gas development on tribal land? And if so, how would you recommend tribes replace lost revenue?
  1. In 2017, you wrote that “fracking is a danger to the air we breathe and water we drink” and “auctioning off of our land for fracking and drilling serves only to drive profits to the few.”Thanks to oil and gas development, your home state of New Mexico received $2.8 billion in revenue last year, roughly a third of the state’s general funds. Of that money, a third to half came from operations on federal land. These funds are then used to support schools, build roads and support first responders.
    • Do you not consider this revenue, and the services they support, a benefit to New Mexico? 
    • How would your home state be able to make up that huge shortfall in the budget were you to eliminate oil and gas production on federal lands?
    • The Wyoming Energy Authority estimates that the West would lose $670 billion over twenty years if President Biden’s 60-day moratorium on new oil-and-gas leases were converted to a ban on oil and gas development on federal lands. What would your plan be to replace lost jobs and revenue across Western states?
  1. Along with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, you claim to have been among the thousands gathered in North Dakota to support protestors’ efforts to block the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.
    • Can you summarize your interests and activities in North Dakota?
    • Approximately 24,000 tons of trash were reportedly left behind after the protest. Many protesters stayed in petroleum-based lodging like yurts and cooked and stayed warm with fossil fuel energy. Can you summarize your environmental impact during your stay for this pipeline protest?
  1. According to a Congressional Research Service report, the federal government owns roughly 640 million acres, about 28% of the 2.27 billion acres of land in the United States. Four major federal land management agencies manage 606.5 million acres of this land, or about 95% of all federal land in the United States. In addition, the U.S. owns 1.76 billion acres of offshore mineral estate, for a total of around 2.4 billion acres of mineral estate. This amount of land interest is larger than all countries in the world except Russia and Canada.
    • Do you support the U.S. government owning so much land?
    • Which levels of government—tribes, municipalities, counties, states, the federal government, etc.—do you think are best suited to manage these lands?
  1. Thanks in part to horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, the U.S. oil industry now pumps about 12 million barrels a day overall, and shale-oil companies account for about 8 million barrels of that total—roughly 8% to 10% of the global supply of oil. We are no longer reliant on unfriendly or unstable nations for its energy. Meanwhile, unfriendly foreign leaders like Russia’s Vladimir Putin have used energy as a weapon, threatening to turn off natural gas to neighboring nations like Ukraine.
    • As the child of two parents who served in the U.S. military, what is your view on energy security and responsibilities to our allies overseas?
    • If America is able to aid our allies with plentiful, affordable natural gas, what would your message to be nations like Ukraine when denying them natural gas (in the form of delivered liquified natural gas – LNG)?
  1. As a small business owner yourself, you have firsthand knowledge of the role regulations can play in when trying to keep a business afloat.
    • What is your view on the federal government’s regulatory role? What should it do, and just as importantly, what shouldn’t it do? 

For more information on Rep. Haaland’s record on energy issues, and details on positions held by other Biden cabinet nominations check out the American Energy Alliance’s database on nominees and their positions on energy topics.

Top 10 Questions for DOI Nominee Deb Haaland


America’s newfound energy dominance could be in peril if promises of unrealistic, expensive energy policies are implemented.


WASHINGTON DC (February 22, 2021) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) issued its top ten suggested questions for the Department of Interior nominee Representative Deb Haaland for tomorrow’s Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee confirmation hearing. The Department of Interior oversees America’s vast federal public lands and is arguably the most important federal department determining the fate of America’s energy production—and energy future.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement ahead of the hearing:

“Americans should be very concerned about President Biden’s radical choice for the Department of the Interior. Representative Haaland has made disparaging comments not only about domestic oil and natural gas production, but also about the workers themselves. She has made clear her opposition to the technology of fracking and the construction of new pipelines. As a representative from New Mexico, she should know better. Her state depends on oil and gas production on federal lands to support schools, build roads, and support first responders. She is simply the wrong choice for the Department of Interior.”


Top Ten Questions from the American Energy Alliance:

  1. As one of the sponsors of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019, you have publicly stated your support for achieving 100% renewable energy and proposals like the Green New Deal.
  1. A recent cold snap in Texas, which neighbors your home state of New Mexico, exposed an over-reliance on intermittent renewable energy sources that cannot deliver when it’s needed the most. Half of the wind turbines froze, causing wind’s share of electricity to plunge to 8% from 42%. As a result, power prices in the wholesale market spiked, and millions of Texans lost power and at least twenty-three have died.
    • Is there anything you’d like to say to these Texans and their families?
  1. The U.S. Treasury has estimated that the Production Tax Credit that funds wind power will cost taxpayers $40.12 billion from 2018 to 2027, making it the most expensive energy subsidy under current tax law. To date, wind only contributes about 7.3% of total U.S. utility-scale electricity generation according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA.)
    • Do you think this ratio of subsidy to wind generation is a fair return on investment for U.S. taxpayers? If so, why? If not, would you support ending subsidies for wind power generation?
  1. China used more cement in just three years than the U.S. did in the entire 20th century. Last year, they increased their coal plant capacity by more than three times the amount the entire rest of the world did. They make over half the world’s steel and use over half the world’s coal, nearly 5 times that of the U.S. This year, for the first time in 150 years, they will surpass the U.S. in refinery capacity. They also control the world’s supply chain for rare earth elements and strategic and critical minerals necessary for renewable energy like solar panels, windmills and batteries. In fact, the U.S. is nearly four times more dependent on them for minerals critical for these technologies than we ever were on the Middle East for oil imports.
    • Is this impending reliance on China something that concerns you?
  1. As a 35th generation New Mexican and member of Pueblo of Laguna west of Albuquerque, you likely recognize and support the ability for tribes to act in their own best interest and as a sovereign nation including establishing casinos as a means of revenue. Yet, you have been an outward critic of oil and gas development on public lands and the use of hydraulic fracturing, a technique that has been safely performed millions of times and largely credited with unlocking America’s shale reserves.
    • How would you respond to tribes like the Ute Indian Tribe in Utah who have developed the oil and gas on their tribal lands using hydraulic fracturing?
    • Are they wrong for pursuing the natural resources on their lands?
    • Would you seek to end their oil and gas development on their sovereign soil? And if so, where you would suggest their redirect their economy which is reliant on oil and natural gas development?
  1. In 2017, you wrote that “fracking is a danger to the air we breathe and water we drink” and “auctioning off of our land for fracking and drilling serves only to drive profits to the few.”
    • Thanks to oil and gas development, your home state of New Mexico received $2.8 billion in revenue last year, roughly a third of the state’s general funds. Of that money, a third to half came from operations on federal land. These funds are then used to support schools, build roads and support first responders.
    • Do you not consider this revenue, and the services they support, a benefit to New Mexico? How would your home state be able to make up that huge shortfall in the budget were you to eliminate oil and gas production on federal lands?
    • Furthermore, the Wyoming Energy Authority estimates that the West would lose $670 billion over twenty years if President Biden’s 60-day moratorium on new oil-and-gas leases were converted to a ban on oil and gas development on federal lands.
    • What would your plan be to replace these jobs and revenue in New Mexico and across other Western states?
  1. Along with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, you claim to have been among the thousands gathered in North Dakota to support protestors’ efforts to block the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.
    • Were you paid or financially compensated by any organization for your time or expenses for this protest?
    • Approximately 24,000 tons of trash were reportedly left behind after this “environmental” protest against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and many stayed in petroleum-based lodging like yurts and cooked and stayed warm and cooked with natural gas-based fuels like propane.
    • Are you able to summarize your environmental impact during your stay for this pipeline protest?
  1. According to a Congressional Research Service report, the federal government owns roughly 640 million acres, about 28% of the 2.27 billion acres of land in the United States. Four major federal land management agencies manage 606.5 million acres of this land, or about 95% of all federal land in the United States. In addition, the US owns 1.76 billion acres of offshore mineral estate, for a total of around 2.4 billion acres of mineral estate. This amount of land interest is larger than all countries in the world except Russia and Canada.
    • Do you support the U.S. government owning so much land?
    • Which level of government do you think is best suited to manage these lands – state or federal?
  1. Thanks in part to horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, the U.S. oil industry now pumps about 12 million barrels a day overall, and shale-oil companies account for about 8 million barrels of that total—roughly 8% to 10% of the global supply of oil. We are no longer reliant on unfriendly or unstable nations for its energy.
    • Unfriendly foreign leaders like Russia’s Vladimir Putin have used energy as a weapon, threatening to turn off natural gas to neighboring nations like Ukraine.
    • As the child of two parents who served in the U.S. military, what is your view on energy security and responsibilities to our allies overseas?
    • If America is able to aid our allies with plentiful, affordable natural gas, what would your message be to nations like Ukraine when denying them natural gas (in the form of delivered liquified natural gas – LNG)?
  1. As a small business owner yourself, you have firsthand knowledge of the role regulations can play in when trying to keep a business afloat.
    • What is your view on the federal government’s regulatory role? What should it do, and just as importantly, what shouldn’t it do?

Rep. Deb Haaland’s confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin at 9:30am EST on February 23, 2021 in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #24: Tom and Mike On Recent Developments in DC, Texas, and Elsewhere

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike weigh in on recent Congressional hearings, president Biden’s recent flub filled town hall, new details on the nation’s COVID response, and look at some of the factors contributing to the tragedy unfolding in Texas.

Links:

Super Bowl streaker audio

Republican voters are tired of a party that simply wants to ‘hold the line’

Fact check: Biden makes at least four false statistical claims at CNN town hall

Joe Biden on China’s human rights violations and genocide against the Uighurs: “culturally there are different norms”

Understanding the Texas Energy Predicament

“Teachers should be a priority.”

Not even a month in and “follow the science” is already out the window

Biden says there was no vaccine when he came into office. That is abjectly FALSE. President Trump brought about the fastest vaccine for a novel pathogen in history

Pruitt: Trump asked, ‘Should we shut down the agency?’

Sen. John Kennedy tells Neera Tanden on her old tweets

The Unregulated Podcast: #23 Tom and Mike Discuss This Week’s Headlines

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike weigh in on Trump’s second impeachment trial, the results in New York’s 22nd Congressional district, New Mexico coming to terms with the consequences of its electoral decisions, double masking, China’s coal war with Australia, French failures to meet the Paris Agreement standards, Disney’s sacking of Gina Carano, and more.

Links:

GOP demands Pelosi pay fine for bypassing metal detectors

Rep. Claudia Tenney sworn into office to represent NY-22 in Congress

Democrat lawyers w/ Perkins Coie fighting against seating the winning Republican in NY’s CD 22 are arguing in briefs the voting machines “changed thousands of votes.”

Where Are The Green Jobs? Jen Psaki Can’t Answer Simple Question About American Energy Workers

N.M. seeks clarity on Biden oil and gas order

Automakers Drop Efforts to Derail California Climate Rules

China’s Coal War With Australia Fuels Shortage at Home

Paris court finds France guilty of failing to meet its own Paris climate accord commitments

MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace Brings Up ‘Drone Strikes’ as Solution

Scott Adams on the Disney controversy

Pedro Pascal’s tweet

Organizers Reportedly Hit Number Of Signatures Required To Force Recall Vote For Gavin Newsom

Newsom gets heckled

#22 Tom and Mike Discuss The Cost of Biden’s Ban With Kathleen Sgamma

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike are joined by Kathleen Sgamma, president of Western Energy Alliance, to talk about the cost of Biden’s drilling moratorium and WEA’s legal efforts to stop Biden’s illegal executive actions. They also dive into a busy week of headlines in D.C. and baseball.

Links:

Learn more about the Western Energy Alliance

Western Energy Alliance Cost of the Biden Leasing Ban

Coal to Exit From U.S. Power System by 2033, Morgan Stanley Says

AOC Wasn’t Even in the Capitol Building During Her ‘Near Death’ Experience

‘True Red Sox’: Pedroia retires after 14 years

Grassley, Lee Reintroduce Balanced Budget Amendment

John Kerry: “It’s the only choice for somebody like me who is traveling the world to win this battle…”

Top 10 Questions for EPA Nominee Michael Regan


How will Biden’s EPA administrator find consensus amid
White House climate czars and Big Green, Inc.?


WASHINGTON DC (February 2, 2020) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) issued ten questions for tomorrow’s Senate Environment and Public Works Committee confirmation hearing of Michael S. Regan. AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement ahead of the hearing:

“As a state regulator, Michael Regan has real-world experience balancing environmental protection and economic growth. He has approved projects like the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and could be an effective contributor to America’s energy and environmental success story. However, he will have non-confirmed White House climate czars like Gina McCarthy and John Kerry to contend with. Time and time again, these individuals have shown their disdain for the natural gas, oil, and coal industries and have expressed no interest in compromise.

“It’s quite the conundrum Regan finds himself in – much of his resume focuses on working with energy producers, not seeking to put them out of business. Mr. Regan will be in a position where he can push back against unlawful regulations that unnecessarily, but intentionally drive up the price of energy on businesses and average Americans, but will the White House czars override him?”


Suggested questions from the American Energy Alliance:

  1. In 2018, under your leadership at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), you approved a key permit for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline declaring “no stone [was] unturned in the exhaustive eight-month review” and that DEQ’s “efforts have resulted in a carefully crafted permit that includes increased environmental protections, while giving us the tools we need to continue close oversight of this project as it moves forward.”

On his first day in office, to appease extreme environmentalists, President Biden used his executive power to revoke a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline, which had been carefully reviewed for more than ten years. Would you have recommended that President Biden revoke the Keystone permit? How would you use your experience to restore integrity to the pipeline review process?

  1. If Keystone XL was denied on the basis of a negative impact to climate, where do you stand on the importation of solar panels and windmill components or rare earth minerals from China, a major world polluter? Under the Biden administration’s rationale, shouldn’t imports from China be halted just like crude oil from Canada?

3.The Biden administration appears fond of the term environmental justice. In your own words, could you please define what environmental justice means? Could the term be misused, abused, or altered to achieve a premeditated outcome?

  1. On a scale of one to ten, how would you rate the importance of keeping energy affordable, especially for lower-income citizens or those living on a fixed income?

If the Biden Administration’s climate proposals caused gasoline or utility prices to rise significantly, disproportionately hurting this demographic financially, would you advise the President to change course?

  1. The promise of green jobs is not new. On February 17, 2009 – less than one month into his first term, President Barack Obama signed a $787 Billion stimulus package into law and promised 5 million green jobs. In 2012, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) issued four reports admonishing his green jobs program.
    The findings exposed some very low standards and targets, and even those were not met.
    For instance, half of the training programs provided five or fewer days of training. Hardly a robust training for a full career.
    Over twenty percent of the “degrees” and certificates went to people with only one day of training.
    Job placement met only 10 percent of the targeted level and a much smaller fraction remained employed for at least six months.
    At a June 6, 2012 hearing of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Chairman Darrell Issa forced the acting commission of the BLS to confirm that a list of jobs with dubious titles counted as green.
    Even including these ludicrous versions of “green,” the new green-job creation never came close to the 5 million promised in February 2009.
    Back then it was all about a clean energy-economy and green jobs. Fast forward to today, and the discussion is centered around climate justice. With Mr. Biden in the White House again, why will this round of green jobs be any more successful?
  2. Is the EPA concerned with the rise of electric vehicle battery fires? Do homes or businesses with charging stations for EVs present a higher fire risk? Similar to flood insurance for a homeowner who willing buys or builds a home in a known flood plain, would you support an increase in insurance for homeowners or businesses with charging stations to mitigate environmental damage from such fires?
  3. The EPA recently released a briefing paper on renewable energy waste management exposing the vast waste produced once solar panels, lithium-ion batteries and windmills reach the end of their useful life. If the Biden Administration dramatically increases its use of these technologies, what will your plan be for adequate recycling and disposal? Do you believe that certain locations, regions or states will become recipients of this waste similar to Yucca Mountain’s nuclear waste repository?
  4. The former EPA Administrator under President Obama, Gina McCarthy, now sits in a non-confirmed position at the White House. Will you be reporting to Ms. McCarthy, or will she be reporting to you?
  5. Prior to this position, Ms. McCarthy was the President & CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) which has sued the previous administration more than 100 times. Do you believe Ms. McCarthy should recuse herself from any policy or legal topics that the NRDC has sued the U.S. Government on? Why or why not?
  6. According to publicly available tax records, your previous employer, the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), between the years 2008-16 received approximately 115 grants totaling more than $62 million from various foundations. These foundations have been charged with influencing public policy to intentionally stop the use of fossil fuels. Given your background and connection to EDF, how do you intend to remain impartial, fair and objective? Will you recuse yourself on any matters connected to EDF or these foundations?


Michal Regan’s confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin at 2:00pm EST on February 3, 2021 in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

AEA to GM: Best of Luck


Since taxpayers should not be responsible for the automaker’s corporate goals, AEA invites GM’s support in eliminating government subsidies and mandates for EVs.


WASHINGTON DC (January 29, 2021) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following statement in response to yesterday’s announcement by GM, the nation’s largest automobile manufacturer, that it aspired to convert all of its light-duty vehicle sales to come from electric vehicles by 2035:

“GM’s announcement makes it clear that the company sees consumer preference for electric vehicles as inevitable, and they are sending a strong message to their shareholders, institutional investors, competitors, consumers, and the government, that subsidies and mandates for electric vehicles and bans on competing products like gasoline-powered vehicles are unnecessary, unwelcome, and counterproductive to their efforts.

“GM is a publicly traded business and is making a strategic, calculated market decision. In no way should any taxpayer be responsible for GM’s ability to achieve – or fail to achieve – their corporate goal of an all-electric light duty fleet by 2035.

“We look forward to working with GM to get the government out of the automobile manufacturing business and empower consumers – rather than bureaucrats – to decide what kind of cars they want to buy, own, and drive. We wish GM the best of luck.”


It is worth noting that GM has also indicated that it expects to rely on the private market to invest in carbon credits or offsets to meet some of their aspirational goals. The company stated that it “will assess credit and offset solutions in the coming years as the most efficient, equitable and inclusive ideas mature.”


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #21 Tom and Mike Discuss Biden’s Energy Plan With a Special Guest

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike are joined by The Honorable Dan Simmons, former head of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, to discuss Joe Biden’s first moves on energy. They also get in their Super Bowl predictions and give insight into a busy news week.

Links:

The Day Europe’s Power Grid Came Close to a Massive Blackout

Biden Suspends New Leases for Oil and Gas Drilling on Federal Lands

Department of Energy Announces New Senior Leaders

Biden’s Energy Nominee Divvied Millions In Taxpayer Funds To Alternative Energy Startups That Went Bankrupt

Schumer calls for Biden to declare climate emergency

President Biden: “Unity requires you to eliminate the vitriol.”

Amazon Seeks to Postpone Alabama Unionization Vote

California Governor Gavin Newsom lifts virus stay-at-home orders

Pro-abortion protesters storm pro-life Mass in Ohio cathedral, demand free abortions

Oil-producing Native American tribe seeks exemption from Biden drilling pause

SCHUMER: “Senators will have to decide if Donald John Trump incited the erection.”

Bill McKibben Twitter rant

Biden’s “Climate Day” Will Live in Infamy


President makes it clear that he cares more about environmentalists in California than workers in New Mexico, North Dakota, and Colorado, or families, the poor, the elderly, or those on fixed incomes anywhere in the United States.


WASHINGTON DC (January 27, 2021) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following response to President Biden’s executive orders directing the entire federal government to prioritize climate change above all priorities – including its own citizens.

“President Biden’s ban on oil and natural gas production on lands owned by all Americans will result in higher energy prices, job losses, and reduced economic growth.

“American lands and waters under federal stewardship contribute approximately 22 percent of our oil, 12 percent of our natural gas, and 40 percent of our coal. Taking that production offline will cost consumers, workers, and families money and will increase our reliance on unfriendly nations for our energy.

“Even worse, these actions are pointless. They will do nothing to affect climate change as competitors like China continue to ramp up the production and purchase of every form of energy they can, as fast as they can.

“President Biden should focus his own energies on Americans and the American economy. If he were serious about justice and equality, his emphasis would be on encouraging energy sources that can deliver affordable energy to every one of every income level.

“Less American energy means higher prices for motorists, businesses, families and disproportionally harms Americans who earn less or live on fixed incomes.”


Additional Resources:



For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

AEA’s Top Ten Questions for Jennifer Granholm


Biden’s DOE nominee must answer for past funding failures including millions to a convicted felon, and cite what authority she would have to drive up the price of energy.


WASHINGTON DC (January 26, 2020) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) issued its top ten questions for tomorrow’s Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee confirmation hearing for former Michigan governor and attorney general, Jennifer Granholm. Granholm has been nominated by President Joe Biden as the next Secretary of the Department of Energy.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement ahead of the hearing:

“Senators on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee must make Jennifer Granholm answer for her record of funding and advocating failed green-energy companies, including handing millions of dollars to a felon convicted of embezzlement. As Governor, these failures were limited to unfortunate Michigan taxpayers. If she were to be confirmed to run the Department of Energy, she would take her failures national, impacting all of us. Only in Washington, it seems, you can fail your audition so miserably and still get a promotion.

“Jennifer Granholm is simply the wrong person to run the Department of Energy. Her record of failures in the State of Michigan is evidence enough that she is a bad manager. On top of that, she clearly has no interest in reducing the cost of energy and making the economy more efficient and competitive, or improving energy security – two central tenants in DOE’s mission.”

  1. The Michigan Economic Growth Authority (MEGA), for which you approved billions of dollars in tax credits for 434 projects, only proved to be successful in 2.3 percent of projects in meeting job creation goals.
    • What have you learned from this failure?
  2. Furthermore, your track record of picking winners and losers in the energy industry is tainted by the fact that, under your leadership, the Michigan Economic Growth Authority awarded a $9.1 million deal to a man who was on parole for embezzlement.
    Would you care to explain how it is that you came to share a stage with Richard Short?What was it about his company, Renewable and Sustainable Cos., that was so compelling that your administration was prepared to subsidize his business?
  3. Some of the battery companies you promoted and funded such as A123, LG Chem, and others, built their business model off the false notion that ten years ago, electric vehicles (EVs) would be ready for mass adoption by the public. The result? Consumers found EVs were not a cost-effective means of transportation and these companies struggled. In 2019, the last year before vehicle sales were skewed by the COVID pandemic, EV sales actually fell compared to 2018 in the U.S. and globally.
    Why do you promote the use of government subsidies for EVs over trusting the American people to make good car choices themselves?
  4. According to E&E News, a well-known source for federal energy issues, the new chief of staff at DOE, Tarak Shah, recently sent an email to DOE staff stating, “We will develop and deploy technologies to tackle the climate crisis and build an equitable clean energy future” and that to achieve these clean energy goals, DOE must reorganize.
    Can you point to the statute where these “clean energy goals” your potential chief of staff is referring to?
  5. In a recent opinion you authored in The Detroit News, you noted that “Kellogg’s, General Mills, Schneider Electric and Nestle agree that a low-carbon recovery is the best choice for Michigan.” You continued, “Michigan-based companies like Ford, General Motors and Whirlpool are also doing their part in setting bold targets to address climate change. ”You then advocated, along with these companies, that current governor, Gretchen Whitmer, must “enact statewide climate mitigation strategies and invest in clean energy infrastructure.
    • If these companies are already committed to CO2 reduction strategies, why do they need the current governor to subsidize them?
    • In the same opinion piece, you stated “the private sector needs greater support and political will from our policymakers to help us fully realize the potential of a zero-carbon future.”
    • Why does the private sector need more subsidies from the American taxpayer if “the economics are clear” as you also said?
    • Additionally, when you say that the “economics are clear” in the context of needing to give the private sector “greater support and political will from our policymakers” are you saying that the economics of a low carbon economy are bad for American taxpayers?
  6. President Biden recently signed an Executive Order (EO) calling on you, if confirmed, to review two rules specifically on energy building codes.
    • If confirmed, do you plan to force states to impose stricter building codes?
  7. The Obama administration, with Mr. Biden as its vice president, set a goal to “reduce carbon pollution by at least 3 billion metric tons cumulatively by 2030” through “efficiency standards for appliances and federal buildings.” The appliance standards program is governed by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
    • Where in the statute that controls appliance standards does the world “carbon” appear?
  8. Similarly, part of DOE’s mission is to work on “Reducing the cost of energy and making the economy more efficient and competitive.”
    • What steps will you take to reduce the cost of coal-fired electricity?
    • What steps will you take to reduce the cost of natural gas-fired electricity?
    • What will you do to reduce the cost of gasoline?
  9. One unifying thread of DOE’s work on energy is to improve U.S. energy security. On Day One, President Biden may have illegally revoked a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline The EO stated, that the “significance of the proposed pipeline for our energy security and economy is limited.”
    • Do you believe that 42,100 jobs, and possibly millions connected to it in one shape or another, is not significant?
  10. Furthermore, the EO canceling Keystone states, “approval of the proposed pipeline would undermine U.S. climate leadership by undercutting the credibility and influence of the United States in urging other countries to take ambitious climate action.” It also states, the “United States must prioritize the development of a clean energy economy, which will, in turn, create good jobs.”

The Department of Labor has issued four reports on the failed Green Jobs Program of 2009.
-The findings exposed very low standards and targets, and even those were not met.
-Half of the training programs provided five or fewer days of training. Over twenty percent of the “degrees” and certificates went to people with only one day of training.
-Job placement met only ten percent of the targeted level and a much smaller fraction remained employed for at least six months.
-The largest green-jobs category was “janitors and cleaners, except maids and housekeeping cleaners.”
-The septic tank and portable toilet servicing industry had 33 times as many “green” jobs as did solar electricity utilities.
-At a June 6, 2012 hearing of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Chairman Darrell Issa forced the acting commission of the BLS to confirm that a list of jobs with dubious greenness counted as green.
• Can you explain how the Biden Administration’s “Green Jobs Part 2” will be successful this time around?


Gov. Granholm’s Senate confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin at 9:30am EST on January 27, 2021. The hearing will be webcast live on the committee’s website, and an archived video will be available shortly after the hearing is complete.


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]