Top 10 Questions for Mallory & McCabe

Promoting former Obama officials with a history of failed policies will not unite America.


WASHINGTON DC (March 3, 2021) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) issued ten suggested questions for today’s Senate Environment & Public Works Committee confirmation hearing for Brenda Mallory to serve as Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and Janet McCabe to become the Deputy Administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). CEQ advises the President and develops policies on environmental justice, federal sustainability, public lands, major infrastructure projects including pipelines and highways, and the U.S. EPA is responsible for the protection of human health and the environment. Combined, the two serve as critically important bodies impacting America’s energy and environmental issues. 

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement ahead of the hearing:

“It seems that President Obama is enjoying his third term as the revolving door between the green left lobby and Democratic administrations continues to swing widely with respect to these two Biden nominees. Considering their roles in the execution of former President Obama’s ‘America last’ energy policy – especially the disastrous so-called Clean Power Plan – this duo is set up to do some serious damage if confirmed. I urge the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee to ask some very serious questions before deciding whether to confirm these two individuals.”

5 Questions for Brenda Mallory:

  1. During your tenure under the Obama’s administration, you reported to newly installed domestic “climate czar” Gina McCarthy. There are a number of legal and policy concerns with the unaccountable role of these czars, including constitutional issues around the Appointments clause, specific statutory limits on their role (which provide limited, delegated authority to agencies and strict transparency requirements on White House/interagency role), unwillingness to provide Congressional testimony, FOIA applicability, and ethics requirements.
    • Could you explain in your own words your view of these czar positions and how you plan to interact with Ms. McCarthy?
  1. According to publicly available tax records, your current employer, the Southern Environmental Law Center, between the years 2008-16 received approximately 41 grants totaling $10,750,000.00 from foundations requesting the law center attack coal and promote renewable energy under the guise of climate change. 
    • With this kind of paid advocacy in your history, how do you intend to remain impartial, fair and objective?  Will you recuse yourself on any matters connected to these foundations or the law center, which is currently involved in litigation on CEQ’s 2020 NEPA modernization rule?
  1. The Biden administration appears fond of the term environmental justice. 
    • In your own words, could you please define what environmental justice means? Could the term be misused, abused, or altered to achieve a premeditated outcome?  Do you believe that energy companies intentionally target specific communities and seek to take advantage of them?  If so, how?
  1. The Trump administration enacted several positive, commonsense regulatory reforms that promoted American energy development. However, the Biden administration has pledged to undue of the previous administration’s work as much as possible. 
    • Do you believe there are any actions the Trump administration took or regulations implemented that shouldn’t be changed? If so, which ones?
  1. In an executive order aimed at tackling climate change, President Biden directed federal agencies to “eliminate fossil fuel subsidies as consistent with applicable law.” Mr. Biden also said he would ask Congress to end the $40 billion in fossil fuel subsidies through legislation. 
    • Do you know which subsidies President Biden was referring to since the fossil fuel industry receives tax deductions rather than tax subsidies, and many of the industry’s tax deductions are federal law? 

The estimated amount that the Production Tax Credit that funds wind power will cost taxpayers $40.12 billion from 2018 to 2027, making it the most expensive energy subsidy under current tax law, though the solar investment tax credit is giving wind competition for that honor. 

Do you think the President is confused, and if so, would it be your responsibility to educate him on this matter? 

5 Questions for Janet McCabe:

  1. Roll Call, a Washington-DC newspaper labeled you the “architect,” and in a Newsweek Op-Ed you wrote, you declared yourself the “author” of EPA’s Clean Power Plan (CPP) under the Obama administration.  
    • Given that the Supreme Court took the unprecedented step of staying the CPP, what steps will you take to ensure that the Biden administration’s replacement for the CPP will fully comply with the law?
  1. Your previous tenure at EPA was marked by approval of dozens of sue-and-settle arrangements with environmental NGOs and against states, as well as nontransparent coordination with activist groups. 
    • Will you recuse yourself on any matters connected to these foundations?
  1. Communications obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) during your previous role at EPA revealed that you were using a non-government email address to coordinate with groups involved in the regulatory process and litigation, and therefore circumvented recordkeeping requirements by the federal government.  
    • Why should Members of Congress or the American people trust you this time? Can you pledge to this committee that you will not engage in this sort of effort to avoid transparency? 
  1. China has a virtual monopoly on the processing of rare earth elements that are needed for high tech (smartphones and laptops), defense equipment, and so-call “green” energy technologies. It not only produces the majority of rare earth elements, but it has the most rare earth reserves. China’s market dominance enables it to control prices and put pressure on challengers that threaten its ‘Made in China 2025’ strategy to create a vertically integrated supply chain encompassing mining, magnets, and high-tech manufacturing. 
    • Do you believe China is mining these minerals in an environmentally responsible way? Do you believe the U.S. needs to move to regain control of its industrial future to implement these “green” energy policies? Or should it maintain reliance on China?
  1. In 2010, the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill passed in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives but failed in the Democratic-controlled Senate. 
    • If a cap-and-trade bill or carbon tax bill is passed by this Congress, what form do you think the tax should take: Is it an emissions tax, a fuel tax or a production tax?
    • Which greenhouse gases are covered? Which sources (if any) are exempt?
    • Ultimately, who pays the tax and how would the revenue be spent?

The confirmation hearing for Brenda Mallory and Janet McCabe is scheduled to begin at 10:00 am EST on March 3, 2021 in the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee.


Additional Resources:

The Unregulated Podcast #25: Tom And Mike Are Joined By Phil Kerpen To Discuss The Latest COVID Developments And More

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike are joined by Phil Kerpen, president of American Commitment, as they discuss the latest COVID-19 lockdown measures, political gaffes in the age of Zoom, the resurgence of carbon tax proposals, and recap what went wrong in Texas and what it means for the rest of the country’s grids.

Links:

Subscribe to AEA’s ‘In The Pipeline” daily energy newsletter

Schumer on the ‘true’ failure in Texas

5 board members of Texas utility grid operator ERCOT quit. They all live out of state

Oakley, CA school board members caught on tape mocking parents who desperately need their kids back in the classroom

Follow Phil Kerpen on Twitter

Follow American Commitment on Twitter

Learn more about American Commitment

Dr. Fauci’s vaccine limitation announcement

Key Biden aide said pandemic was ‘best thing that ever happened to him’, book says

Bill Gates says reducing greenhouse emissions to zero is “bigger than anything humanity has done to date”

Romney: ‘I’m very open to a carbon tax’

John Kerry says Earth has 9 years to avert the worst consequences of climate crisis: “There’s no faking it on this one”

Key Vote NO on Granholm Confirmation

The American Energy Alliance urges all Senators to oppose the nomination of former Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm for Secretary of Energy.

One of the main roles of the Department of Energy is managing the distribution of billions of dollars in federal funding and loans. The Biden administration has pledged to increase this spending even further. Thus, Granholm’s record of funding and advocating failed green-energy companies and even awarding millions in state contracts to a felon convicted of embezzlement should be disqualifying. Granholm’s tenure as governor is a long record of distributing billions of dollars in state and federal subsidies to “alternative” energy companies in the name of creating jobs or industries that failed to materialize. This record of failure and mismanagement does not merit an upgrade to a role that will oversee much vaster amounts of spending.

The AEA urges all members to support free markets and affordable energy by voting NO on confirmation for the Granholm nomination for Secretary of Energy. AEA will include this vote in its American Energy Scorecard.

Top 10 Questions for DOI Nominee Deb Haaland

The confirmation hearing for Representative Deb Haaland, who has been nominated for the position of Secretary of the Interior, is scheduled for Tuesday, February 23. 

The Department of the Interior is responsible for vast tracts of federal public lands and is, resultantly, among the most important departments with respect to America’s energy future. Rep. Haaland has established positions that put her nomination at odds with the long-term viability of federal lands administered by Interior, which are critical to the production of affordable and reliable energy. Lawmakers should be prepared to raise the following questions as they consider her nomination:

  1. As one of the sponsors of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019, you have publicly stated your support for powering the U.S. economy with 100% renewable energy and for proposals like the Green New Deal.
  1. A recent cold snap in Texas exposed, among other problems, an over-reliance on intermittent renewable energy sources. Half of the wind turbines froze, causing wind’s share of electricity to plunge from 42% to 8%. As a result, power prices in the wholesale market spiked, and millions of Texans lost power and at least twenty-three have died.
    • What lessons do you draw from the crisis in Texas?
  1. The U.S. Treasury has estimated that the Production Tax Credit that funds wind power will cost taxpayers $40.12 billion from 2018 to 2027, making it the most expensive energy subsidy under current tax law. To date, wind only contributes about 7.3% of total U.S. utility-scale electricity generation according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA.)
    • Do you think this ratio of subsidy to wind generation is a fair return on investment for U.S. taxpayers? If so, why? If not, would you support ending subsidies for wind power generation?
  1. China controls the world’s supply chain for rare earth elements and strategic and critical minerals necessary for renewable energy like solar panels, windmills and batteries. In fact, the U.S. is nearly four times more dependent on them for minerals critical for these technologies than we ever were on the Middle East for oil imports.
    • Is this impending reliance on China something that concerns you?
    • How would you consider improving this situation as Secretary?
  1. The United States federal government maintains a government-to-government relationship with the 566 federally recognized Native American Indian tribes and Alaska Native entities. As a member of the Laguna Pueblo, you are of course well-versed on the role that the Department of the Interior has in facilitating and promoting tribal self-determination. You have, however, been a critic of oil and gas development that is important to the revenues of some tribes.
    • How would you respond to tribes like the Ute Indian Tribe in Utah that have developed the oil and gas on their tribal lands using hydraulic fracturing?
    • Would you seek to end the oil and gas development on tribal land? And if so, how would you recommend tribes replace lost revenue?
  1. In 2017, you wrote that “fracking is a danger to the air we breathe and water we drink” and “auctioning off of our land for fracking and drilling serves only to drive profits to the few.”Thanks to oil and gas development, your home state of New Mexico received $2.8 billion in revenue last year, roughly a third of the state’s general funds. Of that money, a third to half came from operations on federal land. These funds are then used to support schools, build roads and support first responders.
    • Do you not consider this revenue, and the services they support, a benefit to New Mexico? 
    • How would your home state be able to make up that huge shortfall in the budget were you to eliminate oil and gas production on federal lands?
    • The Wyoming Energy Authority estimates that the West would lose $670 billion over twenty years if President Biden’s 60-day moratorium on new oil-and-gas leases were converted to a ban on oil and gas development on federal lands. What would your plan be to replace lost jobs and revenue across Western states?
  1. Along with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, you claim to have been among the thousands gathered in North Dakota to support protestors’ efforts to block the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.
    • Can you summarize your interests and activities in North Dakota?
    • Approximately 24,000 tons of trash were reportedly left behind after the protest. Many protesters stayed in petroleum-based lodging like yurts and cooked and stayed warm with fossil fuel energy. Can you summarize your environmental impact during your stay for this pipeline protest?
  1. According to a Congressional Research Service report, the federal government owns roughly 640 million acres, about 28% of the 2.27 billion acres of land in the United States. Four major federal land management agencies manage 606.5 million acres of this land, or about 95% of all federal land in the United States. In addition, the U.S. owns 1.76 billion acres of offshore mineral estate, for a total of around 2.4 billion acres of mineral estate. This amount of land interest is larger than all countries in the world except Russia and Canada.
    • Do you support the U.S. government owning so much land?
    • Which levels of government—tribes, municipalities, counties, states, the federal government, etc.—do you think are best suited to manage these lands?
  1. Thanks in part to horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, the U.S. oil industry now pumps about 12 million barrels a day overall, and shale-oil companies account for about 8 million barrels of that total—roughly 8% to 10% of the global supply of oil. We are no longer reliant on unfriendly or unstable nations for its energy. Meanwhile, unfriendly foreign leaders like Russia’s Vladimir Putin have used energy as a weapon, threatening to turn off natural gas to neighboring nations like Ukraine.
    • As the child of two parents who served in the U.S. military, what is your view on energy security and responsibilities to our allies overseas?
    • If America is able to aid our allies with plentiful, affordable natural gas, what would your message to be nations like Ukraine when denying them natural gas (in the form of delivered liquified natural gas – LNG)?
  1. As a small business owner yourself, you have firsthand knowledge of the role regulations can play in when trying to keep a business afloat.
    • What is your view on the federal government’s regulatory role? What should it do, and just as importantly, what shouldn’t it do? 

For more information on Rep. Haaland’s record on energy issues, and details on positions held by other Biden cabinet nominations check out the American Energy Alliance’s database on nominees and their positions on energy topics.

Top 10 Questions for DOI Nominee Deb Haaland


America’s newfound energy dominance could be in peril if promises of unrealistic, expensive energy policies are implemented.


WASHINGTON DC (February 22, 2021) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) issued its top ten suggested questions for the Department of Interior nominee Representative Deb Haaland for tomorrow’s Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee confirmation hearing. The Department of Interior oversees America’s vast federal public lands and is arguably the most important federal department determining the fate of America’s energy production—and energy future.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement ahead of the hearing:

“Americans should be very concerned about President Biden’s radical choice for the Department of the Interior. Representative Haaland has made disparaging comments not only about domestic oil and natural gas production, but also about the workers themselves. She has made clear her opposition to the technology of fracking and the construction of new pipelines. As a representative from New Mexico, she should know better. Her state depends on oil and gas production on federal lands to support schools, build roads, and support first responders. She is simply the wrong choice for the Department of Interior.”


Top Ten Questions from the American Energy Alliance:

  1. As one of the sponsors of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019, you have publicly stated your support for achieving 100% renewable energy and proposals like the Green New Deal.
  1. A recent cold snap in Texas, which neighbors your home state of New Mexico, exposed an over-reliance on intermittent renewable energy sources that cannot deliver when it’s needed the most. Half of the wind turbines froze, causing wind’s share of electricity to plunge to 8% from 42%. As a result, power prices in the wholesale market spiked, and millions of Texans lost power and at least twenty-three have died.
    • Is there anything you’d like to say to these Texans and their families?
  1. The U.S. Treasury has estimated that the Production Tax Credit that funds wind power will cost taxpayers $40.12 billion from 2018 to 2027, making it the most expensive energy subsidy under current tax law. To date, wind only contributes about 7.3% of total U.S. utility-scale electricity generation according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA.)
    • Do you think this ratio of subsidy to wind generation is a fair return on investment for U.S. taxpayers? If so, why? If not, would you support ending subsidies for wind power generation?
  1. China used more cement in just three years than the U.S. did in the entire 20th century. Last year, they increased their coal plant capacity by more than three times the amount the entire rest of the world did. They make over half the world’s steel and use over half the world’s coal, nearly 5 times that of the U.S. This year, for the first time in 150 years, they will surpass the U.S. in refinery capacity. They also control the world’s supply chain for rare earth elements and strategic and critical minerals necessary for renewable energy like solar panels, windmills and batteries. In fact, the U.S. is nearly four times more dependent on them for minerals critical for these technologies than we ever were on the Middle East for oil imports.
    • Is this impending reliance on China something that concerns you?
  1. As a 35th generation New Mexican and member of Pueblo of Laguna west of Albuquerque, you likely recognize and support the ability for tribes to act in their own best interest and as a sovereign nation including establishing casinos as a means of revenue. Yet, you have been an outward critic of oil and gas development on public lands and the use of hydraulic fracturing, a technique that has been safely performed millions of times and largely credited with unlocking America’s shale reserves.
    • How would you respond to tribes like the Ute Indian Tribe in Utah who have developed the oil and gas on their tribal lands using hydraulic fracturing?
    • Are they wrong for pursuing the natural resources on their lands?
    • Would you seek to end their oil and gas development on their sovereign soil? And if so, where you would suggest their redirect their economy which is reliant on oil and natural gas development?
  1. In 2017, you wrote that “fracking is a danger to the air we breathe and water we drink” and “auctioning off of our land for fracking and drilling serves only to drive profits to the few.”
    • Thanks to oil and gas development, your home state of New Mexico received $2.8 billion in revenue last year, roughly a third of the state’s general funds. Of that money, a third to half came from operations on federal land. These funds are then used to support schools, build roads and support first responders.
    • Do you not consider this revenue, and the services they support, a benefit to New Mexico? How would your home state be able to make up that huge shortfall in the budget were you to eliminate oil and gas production on federal lands?
    • Furthermore, the Wyoming Energy Authority estimates that the West would lose $670 billion over twenty years if President Biden’s 60-day moratorium on new oil-and-gas leases were converted to a ban on oil and gas development on federal lands.
    • What would your plan be to replace these jobs and revenue in New Mexico and across other Western states?
  1. Along with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, you claim to have been among the thousands gathered in North Dakota to support protestors’ efforts to block the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.
    • Were you paid or financially compensated by any organization for your time or expenses for this protest?
    • Approximately 24,000 tons of trash were reportedly left behind after this “environmental” protest against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and many stayed in petroleum-based lodging like yurts and cooked and stayed warm and cooked with natural gas-based fuels like propane.
    • Are you able to summarize your environmental impact during your stay for this pipeline protest?
  1. According to a Congressional Research Service report, the federal government owns roughly 640 million acres, about 28% of the 2.27 billion acres of land in the United States. Four major federal land management agencies manage 606.5 million acres of this land, or about 95% of all federal land in the United States. In addition, the US owns 1.76 billion acres of offshore mineral estate, for a total of around 2.4 billion acres of mineral estate. This amount of land interest is larger than all countries in the world except Russia and Canada.
    • Do you support the U.S. government owning so much land?
    • Which level of government do you think is best suited to manage these lands – state or federal?
  1. Thanks in part to horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, the U.S. oil industry now pumps about 12 million barrels a day overall, and shale-oil companies account for about 8 million barrels of that total—roughly 8% to 10% of the global supply of oil. We are no longer reliant on unfriendly or unstable nations for its energy.
    • Unfriendly foreign leaders like Russia’s Vladimir Putin have used energy as a weapon, threatening to turn off natural gas to neighboring nations like Ukraine.
    • As the child of two parents who served in the U.S. military, what is your view on energy security and responsibilities to our allies overseas?
    • If America is able to aid our allies with plentiful, affordable natural gas, what would your message be to nations like Ukraine when denying them natural gas (in the form of delivered liquified natural gas – LNG)?
  1. As a small business owner yourself, you have firsthand knowledge of the role regulations can play in when trying to keep a business afloat.
    • What is your view on the federal government’s regulatory role? What should it do, and just as importantly, what shouldn’t it do?

Rep. Deb Haaland’s confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin at 9:30am EST on February 23, 2021 in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #24: Tom and Mike On Recent Developments in DC, Texas, and Elsewhere

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike weigh in on recent Congressional hearings, president Biden’s recent flub filled town hall, new details on the nation’s COVID response, and look at some of the factors contributing to the tragedy unfolding in Texas.

Links:

Super Bowl streaker audio

Republican voters are tired of a party that simply wants to ‘hold the line’

Fact check: Biden makes at least four false statistical claims at CNN town hall

Joe Biden on China’s human rights violations and genocide against the Uighurs: “culturally there are different norms”

Understanding the Texas Energy Predicament

“Teachers should be a priority.”

Not even a month in and “follow the science” is already out the window

Biden says there was no vaccine when he came into office. That is abjectly FALSE. President Trump brought about the fastest vaccine for a novel pathogen in history

Pruitt: Trump asked, ‘Should we shut down the agency?’

Sen. John Kennedy tells Neera Tanden on her old tweets

The Unregulated Podcast: #23 Tom and Mike Discuss This Week’s Headlines

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike weigh in on Trump’s second impeachment trial, the results in New York’s 22nd Congressional district, New Mexico coming to terms with the consequences of its electoral decisions, double masking, China’s coal war with Australia, French failures to meet the Paris Agreement standards, Disney’s sacking of Gina Carano, and more.

Links:

GOP demands Pelosi pay fine for bypassing metal detectors

Rep. Claudia Tenney sworn into office to represent NY-22 in Congress

Democrat lawyers w/ Perkins Coie fighting against seating the winning Republican in NY’s CD 22 are arguing in briefs the voting machines “changed thousands of votes.”

Where Are The Green Jobs? Jen Psaki Can’t Answer Simple Question About American Energy Workers

N.M. seeks clarity on Biden oil and gas order

Automakers Drop Efforts to Derail California Climate Rules

China’s Coal War With Australia Fuels Shortage at Home

Paris court finds France guilty of failing to meet its own Paris climate accord commitments

MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace Brings Up ‘Drone Strikes’ as Solution

Scott Adams on the Disney controversy

Pedro Pascal’s tweet

Organizers Reportedly Hit Number Of Signatures Required To Force Recall Vote For Gavin Newsom

Newsom gets heckled

#22 Tom and Mike Discuss The Cost of Biden’s Ban With Kathleen Sgamma

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike are joined by Kathleen Sgamma, president of Western Energy Alliance, to talk about the cost of Biden’s drilling moratorium and WEA’s legal efforts to stop Biden’s illegal executive actions. They also dive into a busy week of headlines in D.C. and baseball.

Links:

Learn more about the Western Energy Alliance

Western Energy Alliance Cost of the Biden Leasing Ban

Coal to Exit From U.S. Power System by 2033, Morgan Stanley Says

AOC Wasn’t Even in the Capitol Building During Her ‘Near Death’ Experience

‘True Red Sox’: Pedroia retires after 14 years

Grassley, Lee Reintroduce Balanced Budget Amendment

John Kerry: “It’s the only choice for somebody like me who is traveling the world to win this battle…”

Top 10 Questions for EPA Nominee Michael Regan


How will Biden’s EPA administrator find consensus amid
White House climate czars and Big Green, Inc.?


WASHINGTON DC (February 2, 2020) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) issued ten questions for tomorrow’s Senate Environment and Public Works Committee confirmation hearing of Michael S. Regan. AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement ahead of the hearing:

“As a state regulator, Michael Regan has real-world experience balancing environmental protection and economic growth. He has approved projects like the Atlantic Coast Pipeline and could be an effective contributor to America’s energy and environmental success story. However, he will have non-confirmed White House climate czars like Gina McCarthy and John Kerry to contend with. Time and time again, these individuals have shown their disdain for the natural gas, oil, and coal industries and have expressed no interest in compromise.

“It’s quite the conundrum Regan finds himself in – much of his resume focuses on working with energy producers, not seeking to put them out of business. Mr. Regan will be in a position where he can push back against unlawful regulations that unnecessarily, but intentionally drive up the price of energy on businesses and average Americans, but will the White House czars override him?”


Suggested questions from the American Energy Alliance:

  1. In 2018, under your leadership at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), you approved a key permit for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline declaring “no stone [was] unturned in the exhaustive eight-month review” and that DEQ’s “efforts have resulted in a carefully crafted permit that includes increased environmental protections, while giving us the tools we need to continue close oversight of this project as it moves forward.”

On his first day in office, to appease extreme environmentalists, President Biden used his executive power to revoke a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline, which had been carefully reviewed for more than ten years. Would you have recommended that President Biden revoke the Keystone permit? How would you use your experience to restore integrity to the pipeline review process?

  1. If Keystone XL was denied on the basis of a negative impact to climate, where do you stand on the importation of solar panels and windmill components or rare earth minerals from China, a major world polluter? Under the Biden administration’s rationale, shouldn’t imports from China be halted just like crude oil from Canada?

3.The Biden administration appears fond of the term environmental justice. In your own words, could you please define what environmental justice means? Could the term be misused, abused, or altered to achieve a premeditated outcome?

  1. On a scale of one to ten, how would you rate the importance of keeping energy affordable, especially for lower-income citizens or those living on a fixed income?

If the Biden Administration’s climate proposals caused gasoline or utility prices to rise significantly, disproportionately hurting this demographic financially, would you advise the President to change course?

  1. The promise of green jobs is not new. On February 17, 2009 – less than one month into his first term, President Barack Obama signed a $787 Billion stimulus package into law and promised 5 million green jobs. In 2012, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) issued four reports admonishing his green jobs program.
    The findings exposed some very low standards and targets, and even those were not met.
    For instance, half of the training programs provided five or fewer days of training. Hardly a robust training for a full career.
    Over twenty percent of the “degrees” and certificates went to people with only one day of training.
    Job placement met only 10 percent of the targeted level and a much smaller fraction remained employed for at least six months.
    At a June 6, 2012 hearing of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Chairman Darrell Issa forced the acting commission of the BLS to confirm that a list of jobs with dubious titles counted as green.
    Even including these ludicrous versions of “green,” the new green-job creation never came close to the 5 million promised in February 2009.
    Back then it was all about a clean energy-economy and green jobs. Fast forward to today, and the discussion is centered around climate justice. With Mr. Biden in the White House again, why will this round of green jobs be any more successful?
  2. Is the EPA concerned with the rise of electric vehicle battery fires? Do homes or businesses with charging stations for EVs present a higher fire risk? Similar to flood insurance for a homeowner who willing buys or builds a home in a known flood plain, would you support an increase in insurance for homeowners or businesses with charging stations to mitigate environmental damage from such fires?
  3. The EPA recently released a briefing paper on renewable energy waste management exposing the vast waste produced once solar panels, lithium-ion batteries and windmills reach the end of their useful life. If the Biden Administration dramatically increases its use of these technologies, what will your plan be for adequate recycling and disposal? Do you believe that certain locations, regions or states will become recipients of this waste similar to Yucca Mountain’s nuclear waste repository?
  4. The former EPA Administrator under President Obama, Gina McCarthy, now sits in a non-confirmed position at the White House. Will you be reporting to Ms. McCarthy, or will she be reporting to you?
  5. Prior to this position, Ms. McCarthy was the President & CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) which has sued the previous administration more than 100 times. Do you believe Ms. McCarthy should recuse herself from any policy or legal topics that the NRDC has sued the U.S. Government on? Why or why not?
  6. According to publicly available tax records, your previous employer, the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), between the years 2008-16 received approximately 115 grants totaling more than $62 million from various foundations. These foundations have been charged with influencing public policy to intentionally stop the use of fossil fuels. Given your background and connection to EDF, how do you intend to remain impartial, fair and objective? Will you recuse yourself on any matters connected to EDF or these foundations?


Michal Regan’s confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin at 2:00pm EST on February 3, 2021 in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

AEA to GM: Best of Luck


Since taxpayers should not be responsible for the automaker’s corporate goals, AEA invites GM’s support in eliminating government subsidies and mandates for EVs.


WASHINGTON DC (January 29, 2021) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following statement in response to yesterday’s announcement by GM, the nation’s largest automobile manufacturer, that it aspired to convert all of its light-duty vehicle sales to come from electric vehicles by 2035:

“GM’s announcement makes it clear that the company sees consumer preference for electric vehicles as inevitable, and they are sending a strong message to their shareholders, institutional investors, competitors, consumers, and the government, that subsidies and mandates for electric vehicles and bans on competing products like gasoline-powered vehicles are unnecessary, unwelcome, and counterproductive to their efforts.

“GM is a publicly traded business and is making a strategic, calculated market decision. In no way should any taxpayer be responsible for GM’s ability to achieve – or fail to achieve – their corporate goal of an all-electric light duty fleet by 2035.

“We look forward to working with GM to get the government out of the automobile manufacturing business and empower consumers – rather than bureaucrats – to decide what kind of cars they want to buy, own, and drive. We wish GM the best of luck.”


It is worth noting that GM has also indicated that it expects to rely on the private market to invest in carbon credits or offsets to meet some of their aspirational goals. The company stated that it “will assess credit and offset solutions in the coming years as the most efficient, equitable and inclusive ideas mature.”


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]