National Leaders, U.S. Senator Tell AEA to "Keep up the Great Work"

U.S. Senator Jon Tester (D-Mont.) joined thousands of other Americans in supporting the message of the American Energy Alliance (AEA), which is currently promoting affordable energy and manufacturing jobs in a nation-wide bus tour through major energy producing states. Stooping to sign his name on the AEA Products and Power bus, Sen. Tester encouraged AEA to “keep up the great work.” Tester’s name is now added alongside other leaders, including Michael Reagan, son of former President Ronald Reagan, Rep. Heather Wilson, Republican candidate for the seat of retiring New Mexico Senator Jeff Bingaman, Montana State Senator Jason Priest, and New Mexico State Senator Gay Kernan.

“The American Energy Alliance welcomes Sen. Tester’s support of our effort to educate the American people about the promise of our affordable domestic energy sources. Montana’s oil and natural gas industries currently employ more than 40,000 residents, and the state is in the middle of a proposed path for the Keystone XL pipeline that President Obama’s policies have halted. The state is also home to more than a quarter of the country’s estimated coal reserves, which despite the EPA’s efforts to kill the coal industry keep thousands of Montanans employed and have made the state’s electricity prices about 25 percent lower than the national average,” AEA Director of Communications Benjamin Cole noted.

“Affordable energy should not be a partisan issue. Next week, as we take the American Products and Power bus tour to Tampa for the Republican National Convention, I am proud that Jon Tester’s name will remain prominently displayed on our 45 foot, 51,000lb, 6mpg diesel-running bus.”

To read more about AEA’s bus tour stop in Montana, click here.

###

In the Pipeline: 8/20/12

Heather Wilson in New Mexico.  Jon Tester in Montana.  Union folks, farmers, ranchers, salon owners, even children.  Pretty much everyone understands the importance of energy and refineries to manufacturing jobs and economic growth.  We welcome them all. Billings Gazette (8/16/12) reports: “Throughout the day, fairgoers, including Sen. Jon Tester, autographed a giant over-the-road bus parked outside the Heritage Building. The bus was driven by representatives of the American Energy Alliance, a nonprofit group that is advocating for a diverse energy policy.”

 

And if you didn’t see the bus while we were in Montana, you probably heard about it on the radio. Voices of Montana (8/16/12) reports: “[Today’s] show was live from Energy Day at Montana Fair. Various guests were on [today’s] show including Senator John McCain.”

 

Let me save you the read.  Electricity prices are going to go up, reliability is going to go down.  EPA and FERC don’t seem to care about either.  That is all. GAO (July 2012) reports: “Available information suggests these actions would likely increase electricity prices in some regions. Furthermore, while these actions may not cause widespread reliability concerns, they may contribute to reliability challenges in some regions.”

 

No better way to put it . . . Environment and Public Works (8/17/12) reports: “”The federal court’s decision to uphold EPA’s plan to permit higher-level blends of ethanol is a huge loss for Oklahomans and consumers nationwide,” Senator Inhofe said. “My constituents in Oklahoma want to be able to use fuel compatible with their vehicles, without having to worry about what kind of damage higher blends of ethanol will do to their engines. This ruling just enables EPA to continue pushing too much corn ethanol too fast through the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), a program that has had negative impacts on the safety of those operating vehicles and other equipment as well as food prices.”

 

Natural gas is the great destroyer.  Fortunately, the Farm Bill spends a lot of your money on biodiesel. Seeking Alpha (8/17/12) reports: The fact that even European producers have begun to cancel plans for the commercial-scale production of biofuels via biomass gasification could result in shareholder pressure on the few remaining employers of the pathway in the U.S. to do the same, or at least to consider feedstock diversification.

 

Again, either the Canadians are getting smarter (challenging to believe) or we seem more stupid. Canada Free Press (8/13/12) reports: “The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) today submitted its recommendation to kill the B.C. carbon tax with the provincial government panel reviewing the tax.”

 

Just a little more on the carbon tax from our friends in Australia. 4-Traders.com (8/18/12) reports: “No one is immune. Charities, councils, schools, hospitals, small businesses, community groups, public transport operators, have all seen their costs go up, during a time of increased economic uncertainty.”

 

Ken Green from AEI has requested from us a formal apology for tying him to our concerns about AEI’s involvement in planning a carbon tax campaign.  We apologize, Ken, and will not make that mistake again.

 

In his request, Mr. Green notes that Arthur Brooks has told “dozens of people” that he opposes a carbon tax. Not one of the dozens has been someone at AEA or (as far as we know) a reporter on the record. What Arthur Brooks has done is allow the use of AEI resources to contribute towards a campaign in support of a federal carbon tax. We are also sorry about that.

 

Furthermore, AEI’s fellow travelers on this effort (we know at least five meetings have been held) include some of the most questionable elements of the American environmental movement.  In the South, there is a saying about dogs, and fleas, and laying down with one and rising with the other.  That, too, is regrettable, but inevitable

In the Pipeline: 8/17/12

Basically, Dan Simmons ran the show, even though it’s not actually named after him. The Diane Rehm Show (8/16/12) reports: “The role of subsidies for wind energy has become a hot-button issue in the presidential campaign. Governor Romney opposes extending tax credits for the wind industry. President Obama has re-doubled his commitment to them. In a rare show of bipartisanship last week, the Senate Finance Committee voted to extend the credits for another year. The debate over their fate will likely surface again in the fall. Supporters of the extension argue all major sources of energy have received federal help. Opponents say it’s time to let the free market take over. Diane her guests discuss the politics the future of wind energy in the U.S.”

 

One job in the coal industry supports six downstream jobs? That’s probably an understatement. Affordable energy makes literally every job (not propped up by government) possible.

 

 

This I don’t get at all.  I thought renewables were supposed to be cheaper.  At least that is what that lunkhead in Hobbs, New Mexico told me last week.  I wonder if he was wrong. CBS (8/15/12) reports: “New Mexico regulators have approved a request by the state’s largest electric provider to add a charge to customers’ bills to pay for renewable energy.”

 

Do you know how the President is always talking about how we built the Hoover Dam together?  Can anyone even imagine that anymore?  Nowadays our government celebrates tearing dams down and lying about it.  When are the Westerners going to wake up? Redding.com (2/28/12) reports: “A federal agency’s former scientific integrity adviser has filed a whistle-blower complaint saying he was fired from his job after he began questioning top officials about “spinning” evidence to tout the removal of Klamath River dams.”

 

We don’t make the news here, we just report it. ACCCE (8/16/12) reports: “Robert M. “Mike” Duncan has been named president and CEO of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, effective Sept. 10… Duncan brings wide experience in energy policy and business to ACCCE. Working with elected officials at every level and in all political parties, he has served as board member and chairman of the Tennessee Valley Authority; assistant director of the Office of Public Liaison in The White House; chairman of the American Crossroads 527 committee; and chairman of the Republican National Committee.”

 

Jon Haubert wanted to know why we keep bringing up the carbon tax.  It is because it is incredibly destructive policy.  And the crew at AEI, led by Arthur Brooks, doesn’t seem to care about that. Sydney Morning Herald (8/17/12) reports: “A TASKFORCE comprising trade unions and manufacturers has cited the carbon price as adding to the pressures on the struggling industry sector in a report to government containing more than 40 recommendations, sources say.”

 

If some is good, more is better. The Australian (8/15/12) reports: “The carbon tax is doing exactly what it was intended to do and hurting Australia’s economy,” he said.”

The “Get Rich Quick” Plan Government Doesn’t Want You to Know About

 

We’ve all daydreamed about winning the lottery and imagined what we’d do with the extra cash—buy a home, retire early, donate to charity, upgrade to the Porsche. But in some areas around the country, winning the lottery doesn’t require a ticket from the local 7-Eleven. Farmers and ranchers in states like North Dakota are sitting on top of winning lottery tickets with the right combination of mineral rights and geology. If a company drills for oil on your private land, royalties from that operation could generate tens of thousands of dollars in monthly income.

Which leads us to the next point – mineral envy. Mineral rights and royalties are not easy to come by, and not every American can own a ranch on top of the Bakken oil field in North Dakota. So where does the “get rich quick” plan come in? Are we simply stuck with mineral envy, and no ability to enjoy the benefits of  the resources beneath our feet?

State Senator Edward Walker signs the American Products and Power bus in Billings, MT.

At an American Products and Power bus tour stop in Billings, MT, State Senator Edward Walker set the record straight about mineral envy. Taxpayers own federal and state lands all over the country that contain billions of barrels of oil the vast majority are under lock and key. Senator Walker aptly pointed out that we don’t need to feel mineral envy—we simply need to change government policies that prevent we the people from developing our own natural resources.

The benefits of increased domestic energy production may not reach every American in the form of a royalty check, but we all win the lottery when drivers can afford to fill the gas tank, families can pay their monthly bills, and when the country experiences economic growth. Tell Washington that we need to unlock American energy on federal lands and unleash economic growth by signing the American Products and Power petition here.

In the Pipeline: 8/15/12

Why we fight.

 

The video on this was awesome, despite the profound physical deficiencies of the interviewee. KXNews Bismark (8/14/12) reports: “You may have noticed an unfamiliar bus driving through the streets of Bismarck Tuesday. The bus is part of an American Energy Alliance bus tour. It’s stopping across the country raising awareness about the importance of Domestic energy production, manufacturing, and also how important refinery’s are.”

 

You know, he wasn’t any better in Billings. KULR8 Billings (8/14/12) reports: “A bus tour promoting domestic energy production made two stops in Billings on Monday. The American Energy Alliance’s “Products and Power” bus tour is going to 18 states over five weeks. The group says domestic energy production provided job and economic growth, and that simple, streamlined regulations make it easier to create new jobs.”

 

Governor Romney was right to come out against giving more taxpayer money to Obama’s cronies.  And Dan Kish is just the most solid person on the planet. USNews (8/14/12) reports: “But subsidies won’t sustain an industry that can’t stand on its own without the government. Just look at Europe, whose governments are now turning away from heavy subsidies for alternative energy production, says Dan Kish, senior vice president for policy at the Institute for Energy Research.”

 

“I laid off 239 last week.”  What else is there to say?  Except that the Obama Administration doesn’t seem to care about any of these people. WTRF (7/14/12) reports: “Governor Romney will be at Century Mines on Tuesday to speak to thousands of coal miners and their families… Local politicians will be speaking as well, including Josh Mandel for Senate, and Ohio Senator Rob Portman will introduce Governor Romney. Romney is scheduled to speak for half an hour, then plans to spend an hour talking with coal miners and their families.”

2,273 Miles and Counting

 

SIGN THE PETITION HERE. 

The American Products and Power bus tour finished strong in New Mexico on Thursday with a visit to the Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico’s annual meeting. The Director of the IPANM, Karin Foster, welcomed the bus tour’s presence at the conference following a speech that highlighted New Mexico’s battle against burdensome regulations that are negatively impacting the energy industry and consumers. As of 2009, more than $7.4 billion dollars of value was added to the economy in New Mexico from the oil and gas industry, and 95% of the state’s electricity supply is supplied by conventional fuels. Given the importance of reliable energy for states like New Mexico and the downstream benefits of a strong refining industry, it is more crucial now than ever that the message of the American Products and Power bus tour is heard in Washington so that economic growth in states like New Mexico is not held hostage by regulations.

On Friday, the bus tour made a stop in Denver where the manager of Bayou Bob’s, Meygan, spoke to the importance of the energy industry and its impact on the local economy. Affordable energy not only allows Meygan and her family to keep the lights on in their restaurant and have a steady customer base, but energy and refined products are also the building blocks for hundreds of manufactured goods like plastics (think about that the next time you reach for the ketchup or hot sauce) used everyday by small business owners. Meygan spoke very poignantly about the importance of energy to her business and family, and the AEA team is very grateful for Bayou Bob’s southern hospitality and delicious food!

The American Products and Power bus tour also bumped into the Keeping Electricity Affordable campaign in Denver, an initiative with an equally strong and important message about the importance of access to energy. For more information on the initiative and the crucial fight to keep electricity affordable, visit their website here.

 

After meeting some incredible people in Denver on Friday, the American Products and Power tour continued north. On Saturday, the AEA team parked the bus at the Wyoming State Fair and set up shop for an overwhelming volume of foot traffic. It was everything the American Products and Power bus tour could do to keep up with all of the petition signatures and eager activists looking to sign the bus!

The importance of energy was not lost on the crowd in Wyoming. The Powder River Basin in northeastern Wyoming is the largest coal-producing region in the Nation, accounting for approximately 40 percent of all coal mined in the U.S. Not only that, Wyoming’s oil shale deposits contain an estimated 300 billion barrels of oil, equivalent to about one-fourth of the world’s proven oil reserves. These energy resources not only give Wyoming residents jobs and Americans across the country access to reliable energy, but these resources are also inputs for a strong refining and manufacturing industry. Without fuel to put in the truck or safety equipment like Kevlar chaps, Americans wouldn’t be able to haul their horses to the rodeo or safely block up fire wood with a chainsaw.

The bus tour team continues to generate momentum and has rolled into Billings, MT for a rally this evening on the heels of a refinery visit this morning. Continue to look for updates from the road, and send us your own photos and videos at engage.productsandpower.org!

 

In the Pipeline: 8/13/12

Let’s review.  More expensive cars ($3200 more expensive on average).  More deadly accidents (as many as 240 additional deaths every year).  No environmental benefit.  A corrupt federal government using its substantial leverage to keep private companies in line.  But other than that, this is a really good rule. American Products. American Power. (8/10/12) reports: “The Committee on Oversight’s report found that the administration “places ideology over science and politics over process” and that these extreme fuel economy mandates have “serious consequences for consumers in the choice, cost, and safety of vehicles.” One example of this is a report from the National Automobile Dealers Association which found that these regulations will increase the price of cars so much that 7 million drivers will no longer be able to afford to drive.”

 

Preach on, Brother Beauprez. Denver Post (8/12/12) reports: “As state and federal lawmakers debate the country’s energy policies and Colorado’s role in the ever-expanding energy economy, let’s hope they remember that unnecessary regulations stifle growth while doing nothing for public safety or health. They would also be wise to listen to voter dissatisfaction regarding overly-burdensome regulations.”

 

Hard to disagree with any of this.  So we won’t. Junk Science (8/10/12) reports: “The slow global take-up of EVs has been mirrored in Australia, with only 18 sold privately this year and 45 sold to government and business… While many blame high prices Mitsubishi i-MiEV retails at $48,800, Nissan Leaf at $51,500 and Holden Volt at $59,990 Australian industry figures point to a lack of government subsidies.”

 

If the carbon tax in Australia did not exist, we would have to invent it just to make people like Greg Mankiw, Arthur Brooks, Kevin Hassett, Bob Inglis, and the remainder of the surrender monkeys look even more ridiculous than they already do. Sydney Morning Herald (8/10/12) reports: “Liberal state health ministers have banded together to attack the carbon tax, which they say will add millions of dollars a year to their health care bill.”

 

How do you think the President’s crew would respond if we suggested that they should allow oil and gas exploration on military bases?  Wouldn’t more of those resources improve national security? Environmental News Service (8/8/12) reports: “The Obama Administration is moving quickly to harness solar, wind, geothermal and biomass energy resources on or near military bases across the United States and on public lands.”

 

“’I was a climate negotiator, and no one had this in mind,’ said David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council.”  Except, obviously, for the Chinese and Indian businessmen, who are clearly smarter than environmentalists in the United States and Europe.  Seriously, read the entire article and see if you can get through it without laughing.  But also remember that guys like Doniger really think they are smarter than the rest of us. NYTimes (8/8/12) reports: “They quickly figured out that they could earn one carbon credit by eliminating one ton of carbon dioxide, but could earn more than 11,000 credits by simply destroying a ton of an obscure waste gas normally released in the manufacturing of a widely used coolant gas. That is because that byproduct has a huge global warming effect. The credits could be sold on international markets, earning tens of millions of dollars a year.”

 

Smuckers should have responded that they planned to start producing HCFC-22. Business Wire (8/7/12) reports: “In recognition of Smucker’s [NYSE: SJM] positive first steps to respond to climate-related risks, Trillium Asset Management, LLC (Trillium) and Calvert Investment Management, Inc. (Calvert) announced today that they have formally withdrawn a shareholder proposal which called on the company to disclose climate-related risks to the Folgers™ Coffee and other brands. These brands currently represent over 40 percent of Smucker’s overall revenues and a significant portion of the company’s recent growth.”

New Congressional report exposes the fact that fuel economy mandates are ideologically driven and will put Americans’ safety at risk

For years we at the Institute for Energy Research have highlighted the problems with the Obama administration’s corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) mandate. We have written comments to the administration (here and here) and explained how raising the fuel economy standard will reduce safety, price drivers out of the market, and reduce automobile choice and mobility itself. Today Rep. Darrell Issa, the Chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, released a report entitled A Dismissal of Safety, Choice, and Cost: The Obama Administration’s New Auto Regulations.  The report, which examines the administration’s justifications for the new CAFE standards, reaches many of the same conclusions as our comments to the administration.

The Committee on Oversight’s report found that the administration “places ideology over science and politics over process” and that these extreme fuel economy mandates have “serious consequences for consumers in the choice, cost, and safety of vehicles.” One example of this is a report from the National Automobile Dealers Association which found that these regulations will increase the price of cars so much that 7 million drivers will no longer be able to afford to drive. Of course, the administration’s rule did not consider the harm that would be caused by making mobility more difficult for 7 million Americans. Instead, the administration had an ideological goal of reducing carbon dioxide emissions at any cost.

It is disconcerting to read the many parts of the Committee on Oversight’s report. One alarming section in particular is one that details how the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board teamed up to marginalize the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and steadily deemphasize “NHTSA’s expertise in safety, costs, and consumer preference and a corresponding overemphasis on environmental stringency.” (See pages 18-21).

As we noted in our comments to EPA, to achieve the result they want, EPA assumes that Americans do not make good decisions about fuel economy. Because EPA believes that Americans aren’t smart enough to decide what car would best meet their needs, EPA is therefore justified in raising the fuel economy mandate because that will make Americans better off. EPA’s argument is absurd, but it is part of the basis for the regulation.

Everyone wants better fuel economy. Who wouldn’t want an SUV that gets 55 mph when we know how much it costs to fill up our tanks and how far we can go on a tank? The average American sees the price of gasoline nearly every day and frequently scores of times a day as they fill up their cars and as they drive past gasoline station signs. But what EPA doesn’t understand is that fuel economy is just one thing Americans care about in a car. We also care about safety and convenience. But safety and convenience do not matter to the bureaucrats at EPA, who only focus on the impact the rule would have on reducing global carbon dioxide emissions.

The Committee on Oversight’s report highlights how the administration is putting ideology over safety. Our environmental regulations should never compromise safety in the pursuit of ideology, but that is exactly what EPA has done in this case.

ISSA REPORT: 'DISTURBING, BUT NOT SURPRISING

WASHINGTON D.C. — IER President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement upon today’s release of the House Oversight Committee report, entitled “A Dismissal of Safety, Choice, and Cost: The Obama Administration’s New Auto Regulations.” The investigation — led by Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) — reveals how White House officials misled the American public and circumvented federal agencies in rulemaking for fuel economy standards. According to the report, the administration engaged in strong-arm, politicized negotiations with automakers designed to appease environmental extremists.

“Ideologically-driven activists in the Obama administration ran roughshod over the automotive experts at the Department of Transportation. The Issa Report raises serious questions about the Obama administration’s concern for public safety, not to mention the fact that the politicized regulations pushed through by White House officials will price almost 7 million drivers out of the car market,” Pyle noted.

“This report is disturbing, but not surprising. The Issa Report reveals the degree to which Obama’s czars will have blood on their hands by reducing auto safety to pursue an extreme ideological agenda. The administration should be ashamed of colluding with green radicals to bypass normal regulatory protocols.  In the end, Americans are worse off, and our highways are less safe.”

###

In the Pipeline: 8/10/12

Tell me again how this Administration favors production from the shale formations. Free Beacon (8/9/12) reports: “The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Association (FMCSA) in June re-interpreted a 50-year-old rule limiting the amount of time trucks delivering water and sand to drilling sites can stay on-site… The change drew immediate criticism when it was discovered and prompted Rep. Jeff Landry (R., Louis.) to join 63 other congressmen in penning a letter to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood demanding it be rescinded.”

 

Try to remember that the LCV is nothing more than Greg Mankiw and Arthur Brooks with a bit less refinement.  If you favor a new energy tax, you really oppose economic growth, and, by extension, the working people who would benefit from that growth. Free Beacon (8/6/2012) reports: “The League of Conservation Voters, one of the nation’s most prominent environmental advocacy groups, is dedicating more than $1 million to unseating five House Republicans it accuses of being global warming deniers.”

 

Well, the Canadians can’t always be wrong. Environmentalism is Fascism reports: “The USA has around 12,000 enviro-non-profit societies, most with only a few paid staff. On the other hand, the USA Green Chamber of Commerce has 35,000 for-profit members and is currently seeking to triple that number (supported by Toyota, Union Bank, etc.)… Green businesspeople know their survival depends on state preferences and on the enviro-zeitgeist. A green business is a movement organization.”

 

Not all news is bad news. American Products. American Power. (8/9/12) reports: “After the parade, the AEA team sat down with Congresswomen Heather Wilson and Senator Gay Kernan for ice cream and sodas at the Main Street Cafe to cool down. The Honorable Heather Wilson, currently running for U.S. Senate, noted that today it takes 120 days to get permit approval to drill on BLM land in New Mexico, whereas in 2006 businesses only needed 60 days to work through the permitting process. Now more than ever, the bus tour and the American Energy Alliance’s fight to push back against costly regulations and red tape is crucial to reigniting the American economy and maintaining the strength of the local economy in New Mexico.”