The Unregulated Podcast #21 Tom and Mike Discuss Biden’s Energy Plan With a Special Guest

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike are joined by The Honorable Dan Simmons, former head of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, to discuss Joe Biden’s first moves on energy. They also get in their Super Bowl predictions and give insight into a busy news week.

Links:

The Day Europe’s Power Grid Came Close to a Massive Blackout

Biden Suspends New Leases for Oil and Gas Drilling on Federal Lands

Department of Energy Announces New Senior Leaders

Biden’s Energy Nominee Divvied Millions In Taxpayer Funds To Alternative Energy Startups That Went Bankrupt

Schumer calls for Biden to declare climate emergency

President Biden: “Unity requires you to eliminate the vitriol.”

Amazon Seeks to Postpone Alabama Unionization Vote

California Governor Gavin Newsom lifts virus stay-at-home orders

Pro-abortion protesters storm pro-life Mass in Ohio cathedral, demand free abortions

Oil-producing Native American tribe seeks exemption from Biden drilling pause

SCHUMER: “Senators will have to decide if Donald John Trump incited the erection.”

Bill McKibben Twitter rant

Biden’s “Climate Day” Will Live in Infamy


President makes it clear that he cares more about environmentalists in California than workers in New Mexico, North Dakota, and Colorado, or families, the poor, the elderly, or those on fixed incomes anywhere in the United States.


WASHINGTON DC (January 27, 2021) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following response to President Biden’s executive orders directing the entire federal government to prioritize climate change above all priorities – including its own citizens.

“President Biden’s ban on oil and natural gas production on lands owned by all Americans will result in higher energy prices, job losses, and reduced economic growth.

“American lands and waters under federal stewardship contribute approximately 22 percent of our oil, 12 percent of our natural gas, and 40 percent of our coal. Taking that production offline will cost consumers, workers, and families money and will increase our reliance on unfriendly nations for our energy.

“Even worse, these actions are pointless. They will do nothing to affect climate change as competitors like China continue to ramp up the production and purchase of every form of energy they can, as fast as they can.

“President Biden should focus his own energies on Americans and the American economy. If he were serious about justice and equality, his emphasis would be on encouraging energy sources that can deliver affordable energy to every one of every income level.

“Less American energy means higher prices for motorists, businesses, families and disproportionally harms Americans who earn less or live on fixed incomes.”


Additional Resources:



For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

AEA’s Top Ten Questions for Jennifer Granholm


Biden’s DOE nominee must answer for past funding failures including millions to a convicted felon, and cite what authority she would have to drive up the price of energy.


WASHINGTON DC (January 26, 2020) – Today, the American Energy Alliance (AEA) issued its top ten questions for tomorrow’s Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee confirmation hearing for former Michigan governor and attorney general, Jennifer Granholm. Granholm has been nominated by President Joe Biden as the next Secretary of the Department of Energy.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement ahead of the hearing:

“Senators on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee must make Jennifer Granholm answer for her record of funding and advocating failed green-energy companies, including handing millions of dollars to a felon convicted of embezzlement. As Governor, these failures were limited to unfortunate Michigan taxpayers. If she were to be confirmed to run the Department of Energy, she would take her failures national, impacting all of us. Only in Washington, it seems, you can fail your audition so miserably and still get a promotion.

“Jennifer Granholm is simply the wrong person to run the Department of Energy. Her record of failures in the State of Michigan is evidence enough that she is a bad manager. On top of that, she clearly has no interest in reducing the cost of energy and making the economy more efficient and competitive, or improving energy security – two central tenants in DOE’s mission.”

  1. The Michigan Economic Growth Authority (MEGA), for which you approved billions of dollars in tax credits for 434 projects, only proved to be successful in 2.3 percent of projects in meeting job creation goals.
    • What have you learned from this failure?
  2. Furthermore, your track record of picking winners and losers in the energy industry is tainted by the fact that, under your leadership, the Michigan Economic Growth Authority awarded a $9.1 million deal to a man who was on parole for embezzlement.
    Would you care to explain how it is that you came to share a stage with Richard Short?What was it about his company, Renewable and Sustainable Cos., that was so compelling that your administration was prepared to subsidize his business?
  3. Some of the battery companies you promoted and funded such as A123, LG Chem, and others, built their business model off the false notion that ten years ago, electric vehicles (EVs) would be ready for mass adoption by the public. The result? Consumers found EVs were not a cost-effective means of transportation and these companies struggled. In 2019, the last year before vehicle sales were skewed by the COVID pandemic, EV sales actually fell compared to 2018 in the U.S. and globally.
    Why do you promote the use of government subsidies for EVs over trusting the American people to make good car choices themselves?
  4. According to E&E News, a well-known source for federal energy issues, the new chief of staff at DOE, Tarak Shah, recently sent an email to DOE staff stating, “We will develop and deploy technologies to tackle the climate crisis and build an equitable clean energy future” and that to achieve these clean energy goals, DOE must reorganize.
    Can you point to the statute where these “clean energy goals” your potential chief of staff is referring to?
  5. In a recent opinion you authored in The Detroit News, you noted that “Kellogg’s, General Mills, Schneider Electric and Nestle agree that a low-carbon recovery is the best choice for Michigan.” You continued, “Michigan-based companies like Ford, General Motors and Whirlpool are also doing their part in setting bold targets to address climate change. ”You then advocated, along with these companies, that current governor, Gretchen Whitmer, must “enact statewide climate mitigation strategies and invest in clean energy infrastructure.
    • If these companies are already committed to CO2 reduction strategies, why do they need the current governor to subsidize them?
    • In the same opinion piece, you stated “the private sector needs greater support and political will from our policymakers to help us fully realize the potential of a zero-carbon future.”
    • Why does the private sector need more subsidies from the American taxpayer if “the economics are clear” as you also said?
    • Additionally, when you say that the “economics are clear” in the context of needing to give the private sector “greater support and political will from our policymakers” are you saying that the economics of a low carbon economy are bad for American taxpayers?
  6. President Biden recently signed an Executive Order (EO) calling on you, if confirmed, to review two rules specifically on energy building codes.
    • If confirmed, do you plan to force states to impose stricter building codes?
  7. The Obama administration, with Mr. Biden as its vice president, set a goal to “reduce carbon pollution by at least 3 billion metric tons cumulatively by 2030” through “efficiency standards for appliances and federal buildings.” The appliance standards program is governed by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
    • Where in the statute that controls appliance standards does the world “carbon” appear?
  8. Similarly, part of DOE’s mission is to work on “Reducing the cost of energy and making the economy more efficient and competitive.”
    • What steps will you take to reduce the cost of coal-fired electricity?
    • What steps will you take to reduce the cost of natural gas-fired electricity?
    • What will you do to reduce the cost of gasoline?
  9. One unifying thread of DOE’s work on energy is to improve U.S. energy security. On Day One, President Biden may have illegally revoked a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline The EO stated, that the “significance of the proposed pipeline for our energy security and economy is limited.”
    • Do you believe that 42,100 jobs, and possibly millions connected to it in one shape or another, is not significant?
  10. Furthermore, the EO canceling Keystone states, “approval of the proposed pipeline would undermine U.S. climate leadership by undercutting the credibility and influence of the United States in urging other countries to take ambitious climate action.” It also states, the “United States must prioritize the development of a clean energy economy, which will, in turn, create good jobs.”

The Department of Labor has issued four reports on the failed Green Jobs Program of 2009.
-The findings exposed very low standards and targets, and even those were not met.
-Half of the training programs provided five or fewer days of training. Over twenty percent of the “degrees” and certificates went to people with only one day of training.
-Job placement met only ten percent of the targeted level and a much smaller fraction remained employed for at least six months.
-The largest green-jobs category was “janitors and cleaners, except maids and housekeeping cleaners.”
-The septic tank and portable toilet servicing industry had 33 times as many “green” jobs as did solar electricity utilities.
-At a June 6, 2012 hearing of the House Oversight and Reform Committee, Chairman Darrell Issa forced the acting commission of the BLS to confirm that a list of jobs with dubious greenness counted as green.
• Can you explain how the Biden Administration’s “Green Jobs Part 2” will be successful this time around?


Gov. Granholm’s Senate confirmation hearing is scheduled to begin at 9:30am EST on January 27, 2021. The hearing will be webcast live on the committee’s website, and an archived video will be available shortly after the hearing is complete.


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #20 Tom and Mike Discuss Biden’s First Week of Executive Actions

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike discuss the wide ranging impacts of Joe Biden’s day one executive orders and how his administration is shaping up in regards to energy policy.

Links:

Major Oil Producers Insulated from Biden’s Leasing Ban

Trump couldn’t have incited sedition without the help of Fox News

Tom Tweets

Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis

Pompeo Officially Deems China Guilty of Genocide

Interior Takes First Step Towards Biden’s Fracking Ban


A moratorium is just a ban by another name.


WASHINGTON DC (January 22, 2020) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following statement in response to the announcement that the Department of the Interior would place a 60-day moratorium on oil, natural gas and coal development on America’s federal lands. The freeze will apply to permits, leases, easements and federal land management plans.

“Many questioned then candidate-Biden’s extremity and couched him as ‘reasonable,’ even allowing him to walk back his statements about bans on fracking or generalizing them as restrictions, but not bans. What more do you need? Biden is two-for-two after day two of his new administration and their war against affordable, American-made energy that supports millions of workers and even more families.

“Despite him literally saying he’d do it, many doubted how aggressive President Biden would be on stopping America’s energy production. Here’s your proof. Sixty days will only be the beginning. A moratorium is simply a ban by another name.”


A federal ban on drilling would hamper oil and gas production across much of New Mexico, North Dakota and Wyoming—three of the nation’s largest oil and gas producing states, as well as offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, which produces 2.3 million barrels of oil and gas per day. For perspective, the U.S. owns 2.46 billion acres of subsurface mineral estate between its onshore and offshore public lands, which is larger than the entire landmass of the United States. All of this will be off limits in President Biden’s latest effort to stop American energy development.


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #19 Tom and Mike discuss impeachment and politics in New York

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike discuss Trump’s second impeachment, Andrew Yang, and politics in New York.

Links:

On Day One, Biden Sets American Economy, Energy Security Back Decades


New commander-in-chief calls for unity then gives American energy workers and families the shaft.


WASHINGTON DC (January 20, 2020) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following statement in response to President Joe Biden’s decision to rescind the permit for the Keystone pipeline, reenter the U.S. into the Paris Agreement, and order his agencies to immediately begin to unravel President Trump’s pro-consumer regulatory reforms.

“My mother taught me to judge people by their actions, not their words. Today, President Biden read a nice speech calling for unity then immediately signed a flurry of executive actions that thumbed his nose at half of the country and squarely took aim at affordable energy, the families that benefit from it, and the American workers who produce it.

“The Keystone pipeline is nearly completely built and an important link for North America’s economic security. The decision today to rescind the permit makes it crystal clear that Mr. Biden stands with the extreme green lobby and not average Americans.

“The Paris Agreement is fool’s errand. Nearly every signatory to the agreement is falling short of their commitment and even if they were on track, it would do virtually nothing to change our climate. The economic inactivity as a result of the COVID lockdowns this past year is merely a fraction of what Paris would require of the U.S. Meanwhile, China will increase their emissions and continue to do what is in their strategically best interest. Even James Hansen, the godfather of climate alarmism, has called the Paris Accord a fraud.

“If Joe Biden truly seeks to unify our nation, he’s off to a terrible start.”


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

Unregulated Podcast #18: Tom and Mike Unpack a Busy First Week for 2021

On this episode of Unregulated Tom & Mike discuss the action packed first week of 2021. From the storming of the Capitol Hill, to the results of the Georgia senate election and the re-election of the RNC chief find out what it all means for 2021.

Links:

For first time in 5 years, US gas mileage down, emissions up (USA Today)

Mike’s latest columns

Georgia Results Mirror the Nation: Still Deeply Divided


Democrats poised to take functional control of Washington,
but still no mandate for fundamental transformation or Green New Deal
.


WASHINGTON DC (January 6, 2020) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA) is the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization. Thomas Pyle, AEA’s president, released the following statement in response to the U.S. Senate elections in Georgia:

“Congratulations to the apparent winners of the U.S. Senate elections in Georgia, Ralph Warnock and Jon Ossoff. We look forward to working with them and all members of the 117th congress to ensure that Americans always have an abundant supply of affordable, reliable energy and the 6.8 million Americans who deliver that energy continue to have access to the high-paying, dependable jobs that have enabled them to provide a comfortable life for their families.

“We look forward to working with Rev. Warnock and Mr. Ossoff to ensure that energy is not made more expensive for everyone simply to provide emotional satisfaction for a select few. After all, when energy prices increase, it is the poor, the elderly, those on fixed incomes, and the marginalized who suffer the most. Surely the incoming Congress is not interested in further harming those important constituencies, especially in these difficult times.

“With their apparent victories in Georgia, the Democrats are poised to take functional control of Congress along with the White House. Let us all hope they don’t lose sight of the fact that they will be governing a deeply divide nation with the narrowest of margins in both legislative chambers. That is hardly a license for a fundamental transformation of our economy or the energy system in this country.”


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

Putting an End to Secret Science Pivotal to Restoring Trust in Government


EPA can finally put an end to history of cherry-picking research to support a predetermined, political outcome


WASHINGTON DC (January 5, 2021) – The American Energy Alliance (AEA), the country’s premier pro-consumer, pro-taxpayer, and free-market energy organization, threw its support behind the announcement from EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler limiting “secret science” in the agency’s public policy making process made common by the Obama administration. 

The new rule establishes how the EPA will consider studies relying on dose-response data, which form the basis for many of its significant regulatory actions and influential scientific information. Dose-response approaches are common when the agency is attempting to determine “safe” or “hazardous” settings or levels, especially as it relates to dosages for drugs, pollutants, foods, or other substances connected to human or environmental exposure. EPA’s new rule, Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, focuses primarily on giving greater consideration to studies where the underlying dose-response data are available in a manner sufficient for independent validation. For too long, public review of the data supporting EPA’s key findings of what’s deemed safe, and what’s hazardous, has been limited by a too-common habit of keeping the underlying data private, even from the EPA itself. The rule seeks to end default, secretive practices and instead encourage greater transparency.

EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler outlined the reasoning of this final rule in an Op-Ed  published in the Wall Street Journal yesterday noting, “The work of the Environmental Protection Agency—to protect human health and the environment—shouldn’t be exempt from public scrutiny. This is why we are promulgating a rule to make the agency’s scientific processes more transparent. Too often Congress shirks its responsibility and defers important decisions to regulatory agencies. These regulators then invoke science to justify their actions, often without letting the public study the underlying data. Part of transparency is making sure the public knows what the agency bases its decisions on.”   

Thomas Pyle, President of the American Energy Alliance, issued the following statement supporting the Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science rule:

“It is difficult to disagree with Administrator Wheeler’s sentiment that transparency knows no political ideology. As noted in the release of this rule, no individual’s private information will be released, citing a process that can verify results with independent review and still protect confidential and personal information striking an important balance between transparency and privacy when it comes to our health and environment. 

“For too long, some in the scientific community have sought to abuse the process to manipulate a predetermined outcome. It’s a shameful practice that must come to an end and shedding light in the dark swamp that Washington DC has become will only help. 

“Just as laws are meaningless without enforcement, transparency is just a political buzz word without proper review. Sadly, restoring trust in government appears an impossible task these days but this rule is a step in the right direction and sets up a future where citizens can verify the information the government is using when making decisions about their health.”

Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]